Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Petition — S & E Shipping Corp. v. United States (Nos. 79-1716, 79-1708, 79-1718)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
U.S., 399 F.Supp. 386 (N.D.OhiO 1975)... .cccccccccvee 18 Lenkin, et al v. … United States, 399 F.Supp. 386 (N.D.Ohio 1975) (three-judge court).
Reply Brief — McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1248)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2016
at 399. … Br. at 24-31.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Perkins v. Laird
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
On May 24, 1971, petitioner, represented by Minnesota Ac torney Generdl Warren Spannaus pursuant to the provisions - of Minn. … My commission expires Jan. 24, 1978. _ EXHIBIT: A DEPARTMENT OF THE, ARMY _ Headquarters, Fort George G. Meade . Fort George G.
405 U.S. 965Opposition Brief — Banks v. Granholm (No. 06-825)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
Tennessee, 399 F.3d 792, 794 (6th Cir. 2005). … [R. 1 Complaint 9 24] Thus, as with Dr. Church, the Complaint is time barred as to him as well. As to Dr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Ballard
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1944
Germain and Jesus, had _ appearetl ‘before the Ballards in tangible: form, so that they ‘could shake hands with them (R. 243, _ | 957, 262, 398-399, 596, 757-758). St. … These masters would appear before group’ ', meetings in thei tangible form (R. 398-399, 506, — 570). .
322 U.S. 78Opposition Brief — Ohio v. Smith
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
.-.cccseeccccssssrccneeses 21 Nt ae ra Tso Seadeteabadbucaasnsswamieeigeaaneiaen 24 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases California v. … Pet. 22-24 (renewing SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT There is no clear, mature division of authority calling for this Court’s review.
562 U.S. 947Reply Brief — Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1952
MENARD, 23 Tex. 349, 399; GALVESTON CITY SuRF BATHING Co. v. HEIDENHEIMER, 63 Tex. 559, 562; DeEMeErir v. Rosison, 102 Tex. 358, 361.) … Menard, 23 Tex. 349, 399. In inland seas, at some places, the tides are nearly insensible.
342 U.S. 920Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 8, 2019
Solomon, 422 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2201, 26 L.Ed.2d 565 (1970).................................... 8 Wallis v. Exec. Comm, of the U.S. Dist. … Solomon, 422 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 399 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 2201, 26 L.Ed.2d 565 (1970); United States v. Palermo, 410 F.2d 468 (7th Cir. 1969); Haller v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Colony Cove Properties, LLC, Petitioner v. City of Carson, California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 29, 2018
United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................... 11 Kelo v. … Galland, 24 Cal. 4th at 1021.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Engebretson v. West
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1940
Ed. 276, 280, 24 S. Ct. 154, 158........ eee eee eee 12 Duparquet Hout & Moneuse Co. vs. Evans, 297 U. 8. 316, 222, 80 kL. Bid. 413> 66 BS. … Close, et al., were complainants, and The Brictson Manufacturing Company, was defendant, herein- after called Close case (R. 24).
311 U.S. 663Brief for the Petitioners — Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioners · 1952
Se 10-23 Fa RMR RPRER CEG SORES aM ed Fl Caw Se Adelie STS Fas 24 3 CITATIONS CASES: » ape ee ® ; | American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., | 213 U. S. 347, 53 L. Ed. 826... … Be laws.” cR. 399). The Sicisectiy opinion of the Court of Appéals comments upon. the: facts that watches bearing the “Bulova” name ;.
344 U.S. 280Opposition Brief — Medrano v. Excel Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399 SNES ei ohit eae be Dadian en bah ak 4 Oe oe Ae ew passim Malden Mills v. ILGWU Nat'l Retirement Fund, 766 Se ee ee |) eee eee 21 Medrano v. … Carr, Fouts, Hunt, Craic, TERRILL & Wotre, L.L.P. 1001 Texas Avenue Lubbock, Texas 79401 (806) 765-7491 Attorneys for Respondent 24
510 U.S. 822Answer Brief — National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court brief · Answer Brief · 1938
S. 42 ).......cccccococecsccoccevee 24 Heald. v. Dist. of Columbia, 254 U. S. 20..ccsecssssssscetseetneeeeee 8 Hertz. v. Woodman, 218 U. … Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399, 418.
304 U.S. 333Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chatz v. Midco Oil Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946
Section 44 of Article IX of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma.................. 18 Text Books Crrep. 18 C.J.S., Sec. 399, page 940 18 Fletcher Cyclopedia Corporation, Vol. 12; Sec. 5539 NORA … S., Sec. 399, page 940, the following pertinent rule is stated: ‘‘The requisite and validity of a transfer of cor- porate stock are governed by the law of the domicile 19 of the corporation, although
329 U.S. 717Petitioners Brief — Department of Game of Wash. v. Puyallup Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973
Indian off.redervaltion fishing rights are subject to state conservation laws only if those laws give adequate recognition to the treaty rights, are “ ‘necessary for the conservation of fish’” (id. at 399 … that while Indian nét fishing is totally prohibited, sports fisher- men are allowed an animal take of 12,000 to 18,000 steelhead trout per year (App. 23-24).
414 U.S. 44Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 19, 2019
On January 24, 2018, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, issued its OPINION AND ORDER (App.9a-19a, [Distr. Ct. Doc. … Kaiser Group Int’l Inc., 399 F.3d 558, 566 (quoting from Redback Networks, Inc. v. Mayan Networks Corp. 306 B.R. 295, 299 (9th Cir. BAP 2004)). 26 CONCLUSION The petition should be granted.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carlton Gary, Petitioner v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2018
GARY WOULD VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION GIVEN THE STATE'S DESTRUCTION OF DNA EVIDENCE....... 24 C. … As this 24 Court explained in Illinois v.
Reply Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2020
See Tr. at 24-25, Clark v. … White, 256 U.S. 399, 400-402 (1921) (question whether statute and treaty provided right of entry for wife and minor children of Chinese laborer); Gonzales v.
Opposition Brief — Timothy Ray Jones, Jr., Petitioner v. South Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 22, 2024
Code Ann. § 17-24-40. … (See Pet. at 24).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2024
EPA, 399 F.3d 486 (2d Cir. 2005) ................................... 14 OTHER AUTHORITIES Ariz. … Supp. 3d 1117, 1123–24 (D. Ariz. 2022), as amended by Dkt. No. 119 (Oct. 17, 2023).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.