Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
2.58s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Washington State Apple Advertising Com- mission, 482 U.S. 888 (1977) ..............................-.- 10, 13 Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 450 U.S. a eseundiainetinieiiae 7 Lewis v. … Limbach, 486 U.S. 269, 278 (1988); Maine v. Taylor, 477 U.S. at 148 n.19; Lewis v. BT Investment Man- agers, Inc., 447 U.S. 26, 43 (1980). See also Mintz v. Baldwin, 1] 289 U.S. 346 (1933).
504 U.S. 334Amicus Curiae Brief — Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017) (No. 15-827)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982). … Rowley, 458 U.S. at 186.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., 24 Cal.3d 809, 157 Cal.Rptr. 482, 598 P.2d 452 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dism‘d, 445 U.S. 912 (1980) ................ 10 Fletcher v. … Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co., 24 Cal.3d 809, 157 Cal.Rptr. 482, 598 P.2d 452 (1979), cert. denied and appeal dism'd, 445 U.S. 912 (1980).
475 U.S. 813Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2022
Glossip, 576 U.S. at 869 (quoting Baze, 553 U.S. at 47). … Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 482, 489 (1973); see also Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 554 (1974); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 481 (1994); Edwards v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
Comcast, 569 U.S. at 33 (quoting Dukes, 564 U.S. at 350). … Id. at 482. (“The preferable alternative . . . is to return any excess funds to the defendant.”); see also In re BankAmerica Corp. Sec.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc., Petitioner v. VIP Products LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 19, 2020
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003); TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Mktg. Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23 (2001); WalMart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., 529 U.S. 205 (2000); LTTB LLC v. … U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Devenpeck v. Alford
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001); Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000); Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT I. … Perez, 693 F.2d 482, 486 (Sth Cir. 1982) (arrest valid because offenses were related); Aj- kinson, 450 F.2d at 838 (same); Biddle, 992 F.2d at 676 (same); Avery, 110 F.3d at 14 (same); United States
543 U.S. 146Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
" See Green Party, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14286. A discus- sion of this case is below in Sections A.2 and B, supra. … Green Party, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14286, at *74.
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
denied, 640 U.S. 1107 (2004). … /d. at 423. It also enabled viewers to fast-forward through commercials, thereby reducing the Producers’ ability to sell those commercials. | A.
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
A History of the U.S. … Crimes and Consequences 423.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 827 F.3d 452, 482-91 (5th Cir. 2016) (Owens, I., dissenting). … U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 531 U.S. 159, 172 (2001).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 488 n.4 (1997); see also Fogel v.Chestnutt, 668 F. 2d 100, 109 (2d Cir. 1981). 18 It may be understandable that appellate judges are reluctant to wipe away the products of significant … Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975) City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999) Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965) Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) NAACP v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rudy Alvarez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 10, 2023
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966); Seibert, 542 U.S. at 600. - 18 - fact . . . … United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000); Innis, 446 U.S. at 291; Quarles, 467 U.S. at 655-56. 39 See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 681 F.3d 35, 41 (2nd Cir. 2012); Capers, 627 F.3d at 482. 40 Neri v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Woodard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Allen, 482 U.S. 369, 381 (1987). In that regard, Ohio’s law is far more similar to the parole statute that gave rise to procedural protections in Greenholtz v. … Collins, 506 U.S. at 417."
523 U.S. 272Amicus Curiae Brief — Cleveland v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Id. at 482 (emphasis added). … See Nollan, 483 U.S. at 841-42; Dolan, 512 U.S. at 396.
531 U.S. 12Amicus Curiae Brief — Al Odah v. United States (Nos. 06-1196, 06-1195)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Johnston, 306 U.S. 19, 26 (1939)). ” Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. at 307. ” Rasul, 542 U.S. at 481-482. *' Jones v. … ‘8 Compare U.S. Const. art. 1, § 9, cl. 2, with U.S. CONST. art.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Battaglia
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Co., 320 U.S. 476, 483 (1943). … Kirby, 74 US. (7 Wall.) 482, 486-87 (1868)); 99 given the court’s ruling, plaintiffs testimony that he was “continuously exposed to diesel exhaust inside the locomotive cab since the first day he ‘
564 U.S. 1052Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S. … DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S. … DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Boumediene v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
* Johnson, 393 U.S. at 485, 487. * dd. at 485 (quoting Bowen v. Johnsion, 306 US. 19, 26 (1939). ® Kx parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. at 307. © Rasul, $42 US. at 481-482. "' Jones v. … * U.S.
553 U.S. 723
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.