Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.14s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981). … County of Orange, 837 F.2d 420, 423 (9th Cir. 1988); see also EEOC v. Home Insurance Co., 672 F.2d 252, 259 (2d Cir. 1982).
492 U.S. 158Amicus Curiae Brief — McGuire v. Reilly
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482 (1965) (“[T]he State may not, consistently with the spirit of the First Amendment, contract the spectrum of available knowledge.”); cf: Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist. v. … Hill, 530 U.S. at 725.
544 U.S. 974Amicus Curiae Brief — 303 Creative LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Aubrey Elenis, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 2, 2022
Servs., 504 U.S. 451, 482 (1992). But no such circumstances exist here. … Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2025
Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000). … Building on this principle, in Espinoza, 591 U.S. at 482, this Court ruled that Montana’s Blaine Amendment violated the Free Exercise Clause by prohibiting religious schools from receiving public scholarship
Amicus Curiae Brief — Joblove v. Barr Labs, Inc. (No. 06-830)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. … Corp., 482 F.3d 1330, 1336-1341 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Amicus Curiae Brief — RCK Properties, Inc. v. United States, 120 S. Ct. 373 (1999) (No. 99-286)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), and explained that there was such a thing as a regulatory taking and that money damages would have to be paid in the event that a government agency takes property … Lucas, 505 U.S. at 1016 n.7.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
PS —— —ea | Supreme Court, U.S. … See TRW, 534 U.S. at 29.
537 U.S. 1099Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
Comcast, 569 U.S. at 33 (quoting Dukes, 564 U.S. at 350). … Id. at 482. (“The preferable alternative . . . is to return any excess funds to the defendant.”); see also In re BankAmerica Corp. Sec.
Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S. … DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 6, 2026
DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S. … DeRose, 6 in 10 U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Devenpeck v. Alford
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001); Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000); Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000). SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT I. … Perez, 693 F.2d 482, 486 (Sth Cir. 1982) (arrest valid because offenses were related); Aj- kinson, 450 F.2d at 838 (same); Biddle, 992 F.2d at 676 (same); Avery, 110 F.3d at 14 (same); United States
543 U.S. 146Amicus Curiae Brief — Woodford v. Morris
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Ed. 2d 482, 102 S. Ct. 2744 (1982) ............ 9 McCown v. Callahan, 726 F. 2d 1 (CAI 1984) ......... 15 Morris v. Dormire, 217 F. 3d 556 (CA8 2000) ......... 11 Morris v. … Bartels, 308 U.S. 180, 181 (1939). H. This case presents important issues that deserve this Court’s attention.
532 U.S. 1075Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. United States (No. 06-643)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
MeAninch, 518 U.S. 482, 442 (1995) (a basic purpose of habeas corpus is to cure “error of constitutional dimension the sort that risks an unreliable trial outcome”); Bousley v. … According to statistics published by the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 14, 2020
Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013) ............................................ 19 Constitutional Provisions U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8 ........................................ 7 U.S. Const. art. … Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 482–483 (1990))). 40 CREW v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 488 n.4 (1997); see also Fogel v.Chestnutt, 668 F. 2d 100, 109 (2d Cir. 1981). 18 It may be understandable that appellate judges are reluctant to wipe away the products of significant … Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975) City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999) Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965) Giaccio v. Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) NAACP v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rudy Alvarez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 10, 2023
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966); Seibert, 542 U.S. at 600. - 18 - fact . . . … United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000); Innis, 446 U.S. at 291; Quarles, 467 U.S. at 655-56. 39 See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 681 F.3d 35, 41 (2nd Cir. 2012); Capers, 627 F.3d at 482. 40 Neri v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 11, 2025
Discovery Network, Inc., 507 U.S. 410, 423-424, n. 19 (1993). Constitutional collision. “[A] State may not, under the guise of prohibiting professional misconduct, ignore constitutional rights.” … NIFLA, 585 U.S. at 767, quoting Brown, 564 U.S. at 792.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kelo v. New London
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Hathcock, 471 Mich. 445, 482 (2004). There the Supreme Court of Michigan properly overturned its own precedent in Poletown Neighborhood Council v. … Legal Found., 538 U.S. 216 (2003).
545 U.S. 469Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
denied, 640 U.S. 1107 (2004). … /d. at 423. It also enabled viewers to fast-forward through commercials, thereby reducing the Producers’ ability to sell those commercials. | A.
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021
A History of the U.S. … Crimes and Consequences 423.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.