Documents

Prospective Grant of Exclusive License: Development of Anti-Angiogenesis Cancer Therapeutics Targeting Adrenomedullin or Proadrenomedullin N-Terminal 20 Peptide (PAMP)

Federal Register · Notice · Aug 31, 2009

Ltd., having a place of business at Level 5, Building 4, 399 Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Arana Therapeutics Limited, having a place of business at Level … Dated: August 24, 2009. Richard U. Rodriguez, Director, Division of Technology Development and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer, National Institutes of Health. [FR Doc.

Notice of Receipt of a Request To Voluntarily Cancel Certain Pesticide Registrations

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 19, 2012

of a request from the technical registrants Valent Biosciences Corporation and Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited to cancel all their allethrins pesticide products registered under FIFRA section 3 or 24 … Esbiol Technical. 73049-156 Crossfire Technical. 73049-359 Bioallethrin Technical. 73049-394 VBC Bioallethrin 90% Concentrate. 73049-395 VBC Esbiol Concentrate. 73049-399

Container Pool Practices of the Trans-Atlantic Agreement and its Members; Order of Investigation and Hearing

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Nov 30, 1994

.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\On October 24, 1994, additional modifications of the basic agreement were permitted by the Federal Maritime Commission … Rutherford, NJ 07073 Hapag-Lloyd AG, 399 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854 Orient Overseas Container Line, 4141 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 90731 Atlantic Container Line AB, 50 Cragwood Road, South Plainfield

Safety Zone; Liberty Island Conductor Removal, Sacramento River, CA

Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 6, 2007

Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 556-2950 or Sector San Francisco 24-hour Command Center at (415) 399-3547.

Announcement of Funding Awards Community Development Block Grant Program for Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Villages, Fiscal Year 1996

Federal Register · Notice · Nov 27, 1996

.); sec. 7(d) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535(d)); 24 CFR part 953. … Box 399, Skagway, AK 99840..................................................... 300,000 Central Council Tlingit & Haida Indian, Tribes of Alaska, 320 West Willoughby Ave., Ste 300, Juneau, AK 99801

Petitioners Reply Brief — Wilson v. Deitz

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1972

A SSS eee meas Central Hanover Bank and Trust Co., 399 S. 306 i iinebibakieteebathenedes see d SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 1971 . … Respondent did not reinstate the petitioner or any member of the class, or make retroactive pay- ment, until compelled to do so by the order of the Dis- trict Court entered December 24, 1970.

Brief for the United States — Kirby v. United States Ex Rel. Crow Tribe

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1922

(R. 24-26, 55-57. See also 51-55.) On writ of error, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment below, except as to an item of costs which is not here ma- terial. … S. 397, 399; Brawley v. United States, 96 U. S. 168, 173, 174; Maryland Dredging & Contracting Co. v. United States, 241 U. 8S. 184, 188. See also Wig- more on Evidence, secs. 2465, 2462.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Piher International Corp. v. CTS Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976

The lower Court decision in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, involving said patent No. 3,518,604, and others,” is published in 184 USPQ, at page 399, and a … conventional non-flared bearing at the aperture 15, Fig. 2, where the rotatable resistor drive shaft 52 projects through the apertured closure wall 13 (see patent specification column 3, lines 10-24

Brief for the United States in Opposition — Baker v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States in Opposition · 1968

enson replied that he thought so, Baker suggested that: if the source could sell to them ‘alone, the chances of - discovery would be reduced (VI R. 399). … On May 11, the trial was continued until May 24 because a key government witness was not available (I R. 7).

Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Alexander v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1971

United States, SUN . 24 de ( Cie, 1064) 1 henmey v. California Tanker Co, An V, 776 ( Clr, 1067), wort, clon, WO (J. . 0 % —riirr . ꝝ 7 hyptok Voy. Hawn & Co, 217 Ped, 267 (KD. Pa, TT—!.. … Theew (N Kenarg v. ae (3 Cir. 1967); cart. den. 399 U.S. mn: } Torin v. Terare fac, 38 F.2d 28 (3 Cir. 1987). Pip Civett: < Mv. Reynolds Metal Co, 434 F.2d 1068 (5 Gr. ;: rte v. N. A M.

Opposition Brief — Habig v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

E) " was entered on January 24, 1973. The petition for a writ ' of certiorari was filed on February 22, 1973. The juris- _ diction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1). … Miriani, 422 F. 2d 150, 153-154 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied, 399 U.S. 910; Cohen v. United States, 405 F. 2d 34 (C.A. 8), certiorari denied, 394 U.S. 943; Feichtmeir v.

Opinion — Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1927

fault of payment, the property be sold to satisfy the charges, Upon a second appeal, that decree was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 6 F. (24) 226. … S. 399, 2; Davis v. O'Hara, 266 U. S. 314, 321. Affirmed. See Ferguson v. Dent, 46 Fed. 88, 96-99; Clark v. Brown, 119 Fed, 130; Beach v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naquan Reyes, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 6, 2020

Williams, we said that review of a sentencing error is "fundamentally different" from review of a jury trial error. 399 F.3d at 456. … state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentencg and, if the sentence . . . is of the kind, and within the range, described in subsection (a)(4), and that range exceeds 24

Petition for Rehearing — Pelley v. Matthews

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1947

Section 14 of the Act of September 24, 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 81, c. 20. Since the scope of the writ was not de- fined by Congress, it carried its common law implica- tions. … S. 399, 68 L. ed. 759, 44S. Ct. 360. And compare Re Mayfield, 141 U.S. 107, 35 L. ed. 635, 11 S. Ct. 939, with Re Blackbird (C. C.) 66 FP. 541. “«(2) Conviction under unconstitutional statute.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jose Antonio Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 19, 2025

Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970)..................................................................... 33 Zherka v. … Bondi, No. 24-1155 (U.S.).

Amicus Brief — Robbins v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Minjares, 24 Cal. 3d 410, 421 n.6, 591 P.2d 514, 519 n.6, 158 Cal. … Maroney, supra, 399 U.S. at 48-51; Cooper v. Cali- fornia, 386 U.S. 58 (1967) ; Carroll v.

Appendix — Smith v. Lehman

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

A-1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT = No. 24—August Term, 1982 (Argued September 13, 1982 Decided September 15, 1982) Docket No. 82-6074 —+ KENNETH G. … Supp. 396, 399-401 (S.D.N.Y. 1973); Christian v. New York State Dept. of Labor, 347 F.

Reply Brief — Scindia Steam Nav. Co. v. De Los Santos

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1981

. $, FILED No. 79-512 NOV 24 1880 AEL R In the Supreme Court ® cert OF THE United States OcToBER TERM 1979 Scrnpia Steam Navigation Co., Ltp., Petitioner, vs. … Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co., 147 F.2d 399, 404-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 861 (1945). ®Brief of Respondent at 15 n.5 clearly indicates the lack of such evidence.

Opposition Brief — Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

Bank, 757 F.2d 399 (Ist Cir. 1985) ...... Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) .... Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. … [Petition at 24-25].

Opposition — Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975

Stamler, 399 U.S. 929 (1970)............ 1i United States v. Gravel, 408 U.S. 606 (1972). 15 United States v. Nixon, U.S. (1974) 42 L.W. PPT TTrrrriiririrrrtT yt 14,17 United States v. … On June 24, 1970, all parties were in- formed that there was not a majority of the cir- cuit judges in favor of the requested rehearing.