Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.59s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
They moder- ate periods of drought and flood, provide cool, clean water to drink, and host diverse communities of plants and animals when in good condition. … While Clean Water Act point source permitting programs have successfully reduced water pollution, non-point source programs under the Act have been ineffective.
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019
For example, the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 74017671q, requires States to enact and oversee “state implementation plans,” which States have wide discretion to shape so long as they are deemed likely … Army Corps of Engineers released proposed guidance concerning the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., 9 which expanded the waters subject
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pittston Co. v. Babbitt
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Thirty years later in conjunction with construing the breadth of judicial review provisions in the Clean Air Act, Chief Justice (then Associate Justice) Rehnquist noted that “[t]he broad language of … Powell, concurring) ("I continue to have reservations about the constitutionality of the notice and review preclusion provisions of [the Clean Air Act]").
517 U.S. 1134Amicus Curiae Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
. § 7409, the Clean Air Act pro- vision directing EPA to set and revise national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”), is an unconstitutional delega- tion of legislative power. … It hardly serves — indeed, it contravenes — that purpose to demand that EPA in effect draft a different, narrower version of the Clean Air Act.[] Under that view Congress would be able to delegate
531 U.S. 457Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The provisions of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act that addressed hazardous air pollutants, 42 U.S.C. § 7412, significantly changed the regulation of those pollutants. … Air Act amendments, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7651-765lo.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000 — Sierra Nevada-Cascade Mountain Region) § 5096.350 (West Supp. 2000.) … Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000-Coastal Protection Program) § 5096.357 (West Supp. 2000) (Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond
531 U.S. 159Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025
air, clean and safe water, and healthy public lands. … Air Act granting the State of California authority to impose its own emission standards.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 18, 2022
Cir. 2006) ........................ 9, 26 Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. … Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 113 (1948)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2025
Code § 48.43.073 ................................... 13 iv Other Authorities California Air Resources Board, Clean Air Act § 209(b) Waiver Support Document (May 2012) ................................. … California Air Resources Board, Clean Air Act § 209(b) Waiver Support Document 2, 6, 16 (May 2012), https://tinyurl.com/3ca8mf7s.
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019
Ct. 2427 (June 23, 2014) (rejecting EPA’s claim of authority to rewrite statutory language to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act). … In accordance with Utility Air Regulatory Group and separation-of-powers principles, this Court should reject the Ninth Circuit’s judicial revision of the Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014) (No. 13-339)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
AiR L. & Com. 449, 455 (1981). … For example, EPA regulates effluent discharges containing copper under the Clean Water Act out of concerns about its aquatic toxicity. See 40 C.F.R. § 302.4.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Before the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act displaced the federal common law of interstate pollution, federal courts recognized “federal common-law suits brought by one State to abate pollution emanating … Petitioners are also incorrect that the Clean Air Act preempts Boulder’s claims.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Electric Co. v. Jackson
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Council, et al. 30-33, which cited provisions of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413, Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6934, 6973). … In the most striking example, the Eleventh Circuit held unconstitutional the Clean Air Act’s scheme for issuing “administrative compliance orders.” Tenn.
563 U.S. 1032Amicus Curiae Brief — Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 657 (2018) (No. 18-15)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Under the Clean Air Act, a company must obtain a permit to operate a stationary source of air pollution. The permitting process has been assigned to the States. … abusive telemarketing acts or practices.” 15 U.S.C. § 6102(a)(1).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Gregory A. Christian, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2019
Hartley, The Go-Between (1953). 18 passed a series of regulatory environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act. … Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, to name just a few.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The provisions of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act that addressed hazardous air pollutants, 42 U.S.C. § 7412, significantly changed the regulation of those pollutants. … Air Act amendments, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7651-765i0.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) prohibits the “discharge of any pollutant” defined as the addition of any pollutant to navigable waters from any point source—except “as in compliance … Duke Energy Corp., 549 U.S. 561, 573, 581 (2007) (distinguishing, for purposes of an analogous Clean Air Act judicial-review provision, “between a purposeful but permissible reading of the regulation
568 U.S. 1118Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
The provisions of the 1990 amendments to the Clean Air Act that addressed hazardous air pollutants, 42 U.S.C. § 7412, significantly changed the regulation of those pollutants. … Air Act amendments, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7651-765lo.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019
Under the Clean Air Act, a company must obtain a permit to operate a stationary source of air pollution. The permitting process has been assigned to the States. … In 1998, however, the EPA issued a memorandum entitled “Periodic Monitoring Guidance.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 24, 2018
User Activity Comment Sheets (3) VOLUME II a. Cover and spine b. … Air drying prior to firing is unnecessary and, in fact, is undesirable since shrinkage is increased.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.