Amicus Curiae Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.
Supreme Court briefAug 24, 2018
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
App. 1
GENERAL [LOGO] ELECTRIC
DIAL
PLASTICS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT COMM
ONE PLASTICS AVENUE
8*236
PITTSFIELD, MASS. 01201
January 23, 1979
Mr. G. Hiner
Office
Subject: Medical Evaluation of GENAL Asbestos Free
Brochures
I expect the first reaction of the average person to the
attached brochures would be that GE has done a very
good thing to eliminate asbestos from its products,
starting in 1972; and that GENAL certainly is a better
product to purchase than competitive phenolics containing asbestos. The brochures are very effective marketing tools.
However, there is a major problem and risk to PBD in
using this advertising and sales approach. While we
can be proud that we stopped using asbestos in 1972,
how do we justify our use before 1972 when the suggestion that a relationship existed between asbestos
and cancer was made in 1935 and confirmed in 1955?
We lay ourselves open to attack on issues such as:
•
Why did we continue to use asbestos
when it was a known health risk?
•
What have our medical examinations on
exposed workers shown (PBD did not do
exams religiously or at all over the
years)?
App. 2
•
What special efforts is PBD making for
retired exposed workers?
•
What efforts have we made to track down
and inform/examine workers exposed
long ago who have left GE or transferred
to other organizations?
•
What has GE done for exposed workers
who have died of asbestos induced cancer
and their families?
Any of these issues could potentially give us very negative publicity in spite of the fact that we are doing a
better job than our competitiors [sic]. On a relative
scale we are doing fine. On an absolute scale, our performance leaves much to be desired. Consider that
•
Asbestos exposure in industry is one of
the most serious issues facing American
industry today. Heavy exposure to asbestos may lead to a related death rate of
approximately 46%. Disease follows exposure by a period of 15-20 years. The disease that follows (cancer of the lung,
pleura or peritoneum) is fatal. No effective therapy exists. Cessation of use in
1972 does not relieve the issue of dangerous exposure to workers and consumers
in 1965, for instance.
•
All MD’s in the nation have received a
Physician’s Advisory Letter describing
the effects of asbestos exposure (see attachment #1).
App. 3
•
All Social Security recipients have received such an advisory letter from the
Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.
•
A national TV campaign stating the
dangers of asbestos exposure is being
planned.
•
A $20,000,000 out of court settlement has
been made to 455 asbestos workers and
more are predicted to come (see attachment #2).
In my view, the risks outweigh the benefits and my recommendation would be to discontinue this marketing
strategy. I would use the “asbestos free” approach verbally with purchasing agents and molders. I would not
use it in media advertising, on truck sides or in our
mailing campaigns.
/s/ Wm. J. Taylor, M.D.
William J. Taylor, M.D.
-W
Attach.
App. 4
GABRIEL A. JACKSON, State Bar No. 98119
C.J. MANOLI, State Bar No. 147342
COURTNEY M. KING, State Bar No. 221239
JACKSON & WALLACE LLP
55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94133
Tel: 415.982.6300
Fax: 415.982.6700
Attorneys for Defendant
BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CONRAD BEAUCHAMP
and OPAL GERALDINE
BEAUCHAMP,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ALLIS-CHALMERS
CORPORATION PRODUCT
LIABILITY TRUST, et al.,
Case No. BC-357289
RESPONSES OF
DEFENDANT
BUFFALO PUMPS,
INC. TO PLAINTIFFS’
STANDARD INTERROGATORIES
Defendants.
PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs CONRAD
BEAUCHAMP and
OPAL GERALDINE
BEAUCHAMP,
App. 5
RESPONDING PARTY:
Defendant BUFFALO
PUMPS, INC.
SET NO.:
One
Preliminary Statement
The following responses are based upon the information that is presently known and available to
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. based upon a reasonable investigation. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. believes that these responses are accurate as of the date made. However,
many of the matters inquired about in Plaintiffs’ Discovery took place decades ago, therefore, information
may be incomplete or no longer available due to the
passage of time. Although Buffalo Pumps, Inc. has endeavored to conduct a reasonable investigation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. cannot exclude the
*
*
*
[5] 14. Have you, at any time, engaged in the processing, marketing, and sale of [illegible] containing
asbestos fibers?
RESPONSE
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. incorporates by reference
herein the foregoing Preliminary Statement and General Objections. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. further objects to
this request on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome, vague and ambiguous, and seeks information that is neither relevant nor reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
App. 6
evidence. Without waiver of and subject to its objections, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. responds as follows:
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. is a manufacturer of centrifugal pumps. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. understands that, at
various times, centrifugal and perhaps certain other
types of pumps were manufactured at the North Tonawanda facility by the Buffalo Pumps Division of the
Buffalo Forge Company and the Buffalo Steam Pump
Co. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. believes that the pumps were
made of metal alloys, and that the pumps themselves
contained no asbestos materials. Typically, however,
the metal components of certain of these pumps would
have required packing and gaskets. Upon manufacture, the original pump typically would be supplied to
a customer with the appropriate packing and gaskets.
Between 1955 and 1985, and during at least some periods of time prior to 1955, gaskets and packing supplied in certain original pumps manufactured by the
Buffalo Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company
and the Buffalo Steam Pump Co. contained asbestos.
Upon a reasonable investigation, neither the Buffalo
Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company nor the
Buffalo Steam Pump Co. manufactured the gasket or
packing material installed in any of their respective
pumps; to the contrary, such materials were mined,
manufactured, marketed, sold, and supplied by others.
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. believes that the Buffalo Pumps
Division of the Buffalo Forge Company on some occasions provided small numbers of gaskets to certain customers along with other replacement parts for certain
pumps.
App. 7
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. has not engaged in the mining, processing, or manufacturing of any asbestos-containing product as it understands those terms in the
context of Plaintiffs’ Discovery. In 1987, Buffalo
Pumps, Inc. filled an order for a United States Navy
vessel for which the [6] pertinent specifications required the use of asbestos-containing gaskets. Since
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. was not using asbestos-containing
gaskets, the customer provided the gaskets. Buffalo
Pumps, Inc. affixed warning labels to the pumps containing the customer-supplied gaskets prior to shipment. See Response to Standard Interrogatory 28.
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. has come to understand that
certain pumps manufactured by the Buffalo Pumps
Division of the Buffalo Forge Company and/or by the
Buffalo Steam Pump Co. may have been insulated in
their ultimate applications, and that in some instances
the insulation contained asbestos as an ingredient.
Upon a reasonable investigation, Buffalo Pumps,
Inc. is not aware that any gasket and packing materials installed on its pumps or those of the Buffalo
Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company and/or
Buffalo Steam Pump Co. bore any product or trade
name. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. has not located specific information with respect to the content, including the
type of asbestos fiber, if any, in much of the gasket and
packing material supplied with pumps by the Buffalo
Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company or the
Buffalo Steam Pump Co. To the extent that Buffalo
Pumps, Inc. is aware of and/or has located military or
other customer specifications that reference the type of
App. 8
asbestos fiber in any gasket or packing materials, the
referenced fiber type is chrysotile.
After a reasonable investigation, Buffalo Pumps,
Inc. is not aware that the Buffalo Pumps Division of
the Buffalo Forge Company utilized any packaging or
containers, as that term is reasonably understood in
the context of pump manufacture and supply, for its
pumps.
After a reasonable investigation, Buffalo Pumps,
Inc. believes that gaskets and packing materials used
by the Buffalo Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge
Company were manufactured and/or supplied by: John
Crane Company, Sealing Devices, Inc., and/or Ace-OPax.
The only manufacturing plant ever operated by
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. or, to its knowledge, the Buffalo
Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company, is a facility located in North Tonawanda, New York.
The business of Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and, before it,
the Buffalo Pumps Division of the Buffalo Forge Company and the Buffalo Steam Pump Co., has at all times
been the manufacture
*
*
*
[13] Buffalo Pumps, Inc. states that in 1987, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. filled an order for a United States
Navy vessel for which the pertinent specifications required the use of asbestos-containing gaskets. Since
Buffalo Pumps, Inc. was not using asbestos-containing
gaskets, the customer provided the gaskets. Buffalo
App. 9
Pumps, Inc. affixed warning labels to the pumps containing the customer-supplied gaskets prior to shipment. The text of these labels read as follows:
DANGER
GASKET MATERIAL CONTAINS ASBESTOS
AVOID OPERATIONS TO IT THAT
WILL CREATE DUST
CANCER AND LUNG DISEASE HAZARD
After a reasonable investigation, Buffalo Pumps,
Inc. is not aware that the Buffalo Pumps Division of
the Buffalo Forge Company published or distributed
any printed material containing any warnings concerning the possibility of injury resulting from the use
of asbestos-containing component products. To the extent it has located responsive documents, Buffalo
Pumps, Inc. will make them available for inspection
and copying at a mutually convenient time.
See also Response to Standard Interrogatory 14.
29. If so, please state:
(a)
When did the warning first appear?
(b) What was the precise wording of the
warning, when it first appeared?
(c) Was the warning altered, amended
or changed in any manner? If so, how and
when?
(d) Where was the warning located on
the product or packaging?
App. 10
(e) When did you become aware of warnings placed on products distributed by other
manufacturers or suppliers of asbestos or asbestos containing products?
(f ) State the manner in which your
product is shipped and the type of container
in which it is shipped to retailers;
(g) State whether any industrial psychologists or human factors engineers were
consulted prior to utilizing such warnings,
cautions, etc.
*
*
*
App. 11
STANDARD FORM 30,
JULY 1966
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
AMENDMENT OR
SOLICITATION/
MODIFICATION
OF CONTRACT
Page
1
of
7
FED PROC REG.
(41 CIR) 1-16.101
1. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE
75 mar 25
P00002
4. PROJECT NO.
3. PRODUCTION/PURCHASE
REQUEST NO.
(If applicable)
N65540-3044-1277
5. ISSUED BY P40:DJC
CODE
N00140
Naval Regional Procurement Office
U. S. Naval Base, Bldg. 600
Philadelphia, Pa. 19112
6. ADMINISTERED BY (If other
CODE
than block 3)
Commander, DCASD Springfield
240 Route 22
Springfield, NJ 07081
7. CONTRACTOR
CODE 23230 FACILITY
NAME AND ADDRESS
CODE
(Street,
Foster Wheeler Corp.
City,
110 South Orange Ave.
County,
Livingston, NJ 07039
State, and
351-2195
ZIP Code)
CONTRACT FILE
8. ⬜ amendment of
solicitation no. N00140
dated _____________ (See blank 9)
☒
modification of
contract/order no. N00140-73-C-0885
dated 73 JUN 25 (See blank 11)
App. 12
9. THIS BLOCK APPLIES ONLY TO AMENDMENTS
OF SOLICITATION
⬜ The above numbered solicitation is amended or
set forth in block 12. The hour and date specified
for receipt of Offers ⬜ is extended ⬜ is not
extended
Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the
solicitation, or as amended, by one of the following
methods
(a) By signing and returning 2 copies of this
amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this
amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or
(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a
reference to the solicitation and amendment number. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT
TO BE RECEIVED AT THE ISSUING OFFICE
PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED
MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.
If, by virtue of this amendment you decide to
change an offer already submitted, such change
may be made by telegram or letter, provided such
telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to
the opening hour and date specified.
10. [Illegible] and
Obj. Ct. Bureau
Sub.
[Illegible]
Conf. No.
Allot.
(RCP No. 301-301-3-040) 000
00024A
AA 1731804.2472
Authentication
Trans
Property
Acct’g Acct’y
Type
Acct’g Acct’y
065872
2D
000000
App. 13
County
Cost Code
007208000FFQ
Amount
decrease
$8,329.62
11. THIS BLOCK APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF
CONTRACTS/ORDERS
(a) ⬜ This Change Order is issued pursuant to
__________________________
The Changes set forth in block 12 are made to the
above numbered contract/order
(b) ⬜ The above numbered contract/order is
modified to reflect the administrative changes, or
changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)
set forth in block 12.
(c) ☒ This Supplemental Agreement is entered
into pursuant to authority of GENERAL CONTRACTUAL AUTHORITY It modifies the above
numbered contract as set forth in block 12.
12. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT, entered into this 25 day of March , 1975
between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (hereinafter called “the Government”), represented by the
Contracting Officer executing this contract, and Foster Wheeler Corporation.
a Corporation organized and existing under the
Laws of the State of New York; (hereinafter called “the
Contractor”).
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the Contractor and the Government
have entered into Contract No N00140-73-C-0885
under date of 25 June 1973 which, together with any
and all amendments, changes, modifications and
App. 14
supplements thereto, is hereinafter referred to as
“the contract”; and
WHEREAS, the contract provides that the performance of work thereunder may at the convenience
or option of the Government be terminated by the
Government in whole or from time to time, in part,
whenever any such termination is determined to be
for the best interest of the government, and that the
Contractor and Contracting Officer may agree upon
the whole or any part of the amount or amounts to be
paid to the Contractor by reason of such termination,
and
WHEREAS, the Contractor is willing to waive
unconditionally any claim against the Government
by reason of such termination.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1. The terminated portion of the contract is designated as follows:
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions
of the document referenced in block 8, as heretofore,
changed, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
13. ⬜ CONTRACTOR/OFFERORS IS NOT REQUIRED TO
SIGN THIS DOCUMENT
☒
CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS
DOCUMENT AND RETURN 2 COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE
14. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/ 17. UNITED STATES
OFFEROR
OF AMERICA
BY ____________________
BY _[Illegible]__________
(Signature of person
authorized to sign)
(Signature of
Contracting Officer)
App. 15
15. NAME AND
16. DATE 18. NAME OF
19. DATE
TITLE OF SIGNED
SIGNED
CONTRACTING
SIGNED
OFFICER (Type
75 Mar 25
(Type or print)
or print)
W. E. GOULD
*
*
*
(6) NAVSHIPS 0351-065-1000 (for main boilers
used on CVA-64)
(7) NAVSHIPS 0351-065-2000 (for main boilers
used on CV-63)
A.
SCOPE OF WORK
1. The contractor shall perform shipchecking,
writing, editing, art and production services to accomplish a major revision of each of the above manuals: NAVSECPHILADIV shall either furnish to the
contractor all basic information (raw material) necessary to accomplish the revisions, or instruct the contractor as to where some information can be readily
obtained. For each manual revision, this information
will include such items as the existing manual; new
or revised procedures for boiler maintenance; description, operation and maintenance information for
newly installed equipment; and photographs of boiler
equipment. The contractor shall use new technical
manual stock numbers, to be supplied by
NAVSECPHILADIV, in lieu of the original manual
numbers referenced above on all tasks. Each manual
will be prepared as a two volume set. A different
number will be assigned to each volume. The acronym “NAVSEA” shall be used in the manual stock
number located on the front cover, spine, title page,
marginal copy and/or text references instead of
App. 16
“NAVSHIPS” used in original manuals. The command authorization on the front cover and title page
shall read “Published by Direction of Commander,
Naval Sea Systems Command”. The Hull designation
CV should be used in lieu of CVA on manual (7)
above.
Services required from the contractor are described
as follows, and shall be furnished for each manual revision to the extent specified in paragraph A3 below:
(1) Page 2, paragraph e(3) Each manual shall
consist of two volumes containing approximately 550
pages of text and text illustrations and 115 fold-out
drawings.
(2) Page 2, paragraph e(5) substitute “Univers
Bold Type” for “Classified News Type”.
(3) Page 3 paragraphs 2 and 3, and pages 4 and
5 in their entirety, are hereby superseded by the following:
2. Each revised manual shall include the following elements, in the order shown. Each text section shall have a divider sheet.
VOLUME I
a.
Cover and Spine
b.
Front matter
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Title page
List of effective pages
Change record
Approval and procurement record page
Content assurance page
Safety summary
Quick index page
Table of contents
App. 17
(9) List of text illustrations
(10) List of engineering drawings (plans) in
volume II
c. Section A – Boiler Description and Design
Data
d. Section B – Boiler Operation
e. Section C – Boiler Planned Maintenance
f. Section D – Boiler Corrective Maintenance
g. Section F – Fuel Oil Burners
h. Section G – Flame Scanner (if required)
i. Section H – Smoke indicators
j. Section J – Soot Blowers
k. Section K – Draft Gage
l. Section M – Water Level Indicators
m. Section N – Safety Valves
n. Section P – Hydrostatic Pump and Test
Methods
o. Section R – Repair Parts List
p. Section S – Special Tools and Equipment List
q. Section T – Maintenance Materials List
r. Appendices (if required)
s. Glossary
t. User Activity Comment Sheets (3)
VOLUME II
a.
Cover and spine
b.
Front matter
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
volume II
Title page
List of effective pages
Change record
Approval and procurement record page
List of engineering drawings (plans) in
App. 18
c. Engineering Drawings (plans)
d. User Activity Comment Sheets (3)
3. For each manual revision, the contractor shall
perform the shipchecking described in paragraph C1
below. The extent of other contractor services required for each manual revision is as follows:
SEE FOLLOWING PAGE
*
*
*
(4) Page 7 paragraph B 4 b – Superseded by the
following:
Line art text illustrations should be incorporated
into text camera ready copy properly sized. Photographic text illustrations must be separately
mounted, covered, and marked to indicate cropping
and percent reduction required.
(5) Page 8 – paragraph C – In order to provide
for the deletion of the manuals required for the
DD937 and DD948 boiler classes and the rescheduling of the remaining manuals, the tabulation
shown for shipchecking on page 8 is deleted and the
following substitution is hereby incorporated:
Shipchecks should be conducted on one (1) ship
in each boiler class except for the DLG-19 and DDG4 classes which will require checking two (2) ships
each. By the terms of the contract, four (4) shipchecks will be required to be conducted on the west
coast and five on the east coast.
(6) Delivery schedule set forth in modification
P00001 to the contract is superseded by the following:
App. 19
SHIPS CLASS
TASK #
--Re
DLG-19
CVA-66🗸🗸
DDG-23🗸🗸
DDG-4🗸🗸
CVA-64🗸🗸
CV-63🗸
DDG-35🗸🗸
I
II
VI
IV
V
VII
X
XIII
FINAL TASK #
CONTRACTOR
SUBMITTAL
PRELIMINARY DRAFT
Completed
Completed
16 JUN 1975
15 MAR 1975
15 MAY 1975
15 JUL 1975
15 OCT 1975
15 DEC 1975
CONTRACTOR
SUBMITTAL FINAL
COPIES
--Sixty Days from Final
Approval of Preliminary
Draft
↓
Re: --1/75
10/10/75
🗸III
🗸🗸XI
9/1/75
🗸🗸VIII
11/75
4/76
🗸IX
🗸🗸XII
XIV
XV
The Government shall be allowed 90 days from receipt to review and comment on the preliminary
draft of each manual. The Government is at liberty
to make comments on any aspect of the preliminary
draft at this time and to require any changes desired
in scope, content, wording, format and editorial treatment as long as such changes do not cause the contractor to perform work beyond the scope of the
contract. If in the Government’s opinion the preliminary draft requires changes or additions, the contractor will be required to revise and resubmit the
preliminary draft or portions thereof for re-review by
App. 20
the Government. The contractor shall resubmit the
preliminary draft or portions thereof within 30 days
from the termination of the 90 day Government review period.
Once the Government has approved the preliminary
draft it may not subsequently require the contractor
to make changes without claim by the contractor. The
contractor continues to be responsible to correct
spelling, grammatical and typographical errors even
if discovered after the preliminary draft approval
date. In addition, the Government may require
changes to the final artwork and drawings, since in
the preliminary manual this material is only required in rough form.
All additional cost associated with revision and resubmittal of preliminary and final task material,
within the scope or the contract, will be borne by the
contractor. The Government reserves the right to require adequate consideration from the contractor for
any extension of the delivery schedule necessitated
by the resubmission.
*
*
*
App. 21
NAVSEA 0951-LP-039-7010
VOLUME I OF II
TECHNICAL MANUAL
DESCRIPTION, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTIONS
1200 PSI MAIN BOILER
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, D TYPE
[SEAL]
USS DAVIS (DD 937)
USS JONAS INGRAM (DD 938)
USS BLANDY (DD 943)
USS MULLINNIX (DD 944)
USS DECATUR (DDG 31)
Each transmittal of this document outside
the Department of Defense must have the approval of NAVSEA (Code 522).
This publication and Volume II,
NAVSEA 0351-LP-039-7020, supersede
NAVSEA 0351-LP-055-3003 dated July 1969.
Published by direction of Commander,
Naval Sea Systems Command.
15 MAY 1980
*
*
*
SUMMARY OF SAFETY PRECAUTIONS
Boiler operation and maintenance is serious business because it is the ship’s power source. Improper operation will cause delay of the ship. But more
important, improper operation can result in damaged
equipment, injury and/or loss of human life
App. 22
Most of the material in this manual referred to as
lagging, insulation, insulating board, packing,
sheet/compressed or spiral wound gaskets contains asbestos. Asbestos is a major health hazard. All suspected material must be ripped-out, and disposed of in
accordance with NSTM Chapter 635 and approved
shipyard procedures when replacement is necessary.
This technical manual contains many NOTES,
CAUTIONS and WARNINGS located where they will
do the most good. Believe in them. They are important
and could save your life.
The following is a summary of precautions:
Before removing any fittings or parts subject to
pressure, or loosening a manhole or handhole plate fitting of a boiler after it has been under steam, steps
should be taken to insure a complete absence of pressure by opening the drum vent.
It should always be borne in mind that a fall in
steam pressure, unless there is some apparent reason
for it, is a possible indication of low water.
There is always danger that steam may leak to an
idle or open boiler through a leaky blow valve, when
the blow valve of another boiler connected to the common blow line is opened. This same danger exists with
respect to stop valves, feed valves, etc. To prevent injury to personnel, the practice of entering a boiler under these circumstances should be avoided, unless
necessary to do so in emergency situations. In those
App. 23
situations, extreme caution shall be observed, especially if double valve protection is not provided.
Tag-out in accordance with OPNAVINST 3120.32
article 630.17 and wire shut the supply valves of steam
smothering systems while men are working in the vicinity thereof. To guarantee that these valves will not
be opened, consideration may be given to the use of
chains or padlocks while men are working.
Do not use open flames in oil-burning firerooms
(except as authorized), oil tanks, or near oil hose, oil
vents, etc.
Remove atomizer from register as soon as possible
after securing oil to burner.
The temperature of any fuel should never be
raised to or above the flash point in any part of the system.
Observe the following precautions to reduce danger
of flarebacks:
Purge the furnace before each light-off.
Do not allow oil to accumulate in furnace. Fuel oil
root valves and safety shut-off valves must be tested
periodically and maintained tight.
When a burner is secured, both its root valve and
safety shut-off valve must be shut.
Never attempt to relight an atomizer from hot
brick wall. Use a torch.
App. 24
When lighting off with a torch, stand well clear of
the light-off port, to avoid injury in case of flareback.
Do not use oil from a tank in which there is more
than 0.1% of BS&W in the oil.
*
*
*
Castable refractory and insulation layers are installed over the furnace drain. During boiler operation,
the bricks protect the drain and casing in this area
from damage by radiant heat. When water washing
procedures are required, the castable and insulation
are removed and drain is uncapped to facilitate removal of water. (For drain location, see Plan A-3.)
D-7-3. BAKING OUT PROCEDURES
a. Drying Out Mortar. This requires no consideration because of the small amount of moisture involved, and because plastic or castable refractory
installed after brickwork governs drying and baking
out procedure.
b. Baking Out Plastic Fireclay Refractory. Air
drying prior to firing is unnecessary and, in fact, is undesirable since shrinkage is increased. The method of
firing must necessarily be that which suits the condition existing at the time of installation; firing initially
at a rate sufficient to form steam within the plastic
mass should be carefully avoided. The necessity for
baking out plastic presents an inconvenient situation
especially during building or overhaul periods. This is
one reason why use of castable is preferred. Careful
App. 25
planning of work is required in preparing to bake out
plastic. The following procedure will give optimum results and should be followed, whenever practical, for
burner fronts rebuilt completely with plastic refractory
in lieu of burner tile:
NOTE
It is not possible to bake out plastic refractory
properly without firing the boiler. Castable refractory must be used if the service available
and the condition of the boiler do not permit
operation.
1. The boiler should be lit off within 24 hours of
completion of the plastic installation. If this is not possible, the plastic should be kept moist by covering with
damp cloths or plastic film until just before lighting off.
2. The superheater must be protected while baking out. Superheater protection steam, when available,
should always be used. If no steam is available, the procedure and cautions for cold light off in Section B
should be observed.
CAUTION
Superheater outlet temperature should not
exceed 850 degrees F while raising steam.
3. One burner with a standard VP-12-2855 atomizer should be lit off (in accordance with Section B-5-1)
for one hour at the minimum oil rate (about 65 psi supply pressure). Then slowly increase boiler firing rate so
App. 26
that boiler operating pressure is maintained about
three to four additional hours.
4. To develop strength, furnace temperature
should be gradually increased to the maximum attainable temperature for the steam demand conditions
(normally maximum port auxiliary load). Firing at the
boiler full-power rating is desirable if permitted by the
steaming conditions.
5. Firing of the boiler at the maximum practical
temperature should be continued for a period of several hours to develop bonding in the plastic.
If time is available, after completion of baking out
procedure and when brickwork has cooled sufficiently,
it is advisable to open furnace and inspect settings.
c. Baking Out of Castable Refractory. Castable
refractory should be allowed to dry (cure) for at least
one, but preferably two days before baking out. Indefinitely long drying periods are not harmful. Baking out
of castable refractory should be performed in the same
manner as for plastic refractory.
D-8. CASING
D-8-1. REPLACEMENT OF CASING GASKETS
a.
Types of Gaskets
1. During original construction 1/8-inch
thick copper clad asbestos gaskets were used for all
casing seals. Two types of replacement gaskets are
commonly used to seal access doors and panels. A
App. 27
“tadpole’’ or bulb-type gasket is used with access doors
that are installed with clamps and a flat ribbon-type
gasket is used with bolted-on panels. The flat ribbontype gasket is usually 1/8-inch thick. Gaskets made of
asbestos material must not be used; they must be replaced with gasket made of ceramic or fiberglass material.
2. A 3/8-inch ceramic fiber rope can be used
as a temporary gasket by itself or can be used to supplement other gaskets in stopping air leaks due to casing distortion or warpage. When using ceramic fiber
rope as a gasket on a bolted door, the rope should be
laced between studs.
b. Gasket Installation. Inner or outer casing surfaces where gaskets seat should be inspected before
panel or door gasket installation to insure satisfactory
surface conditions are present. Corrosion deposits or
remains of old gasket material should be removed by
scraping and wire brushing. If casing frames have been
repaired or replaced, and welding has been accomplished in a gasket seating area, excess weld should be
removed by grinding to insure surface is entirely
smooth. Also remove any weld splatter by grinding. If
stud replacement has been accomplished, remove any
excess weld at stud base by grinding to insure panel
will fit tightly against seating surface.
Gaskets can be held in the proper position when
refitting a panel by the use of small pieces of masking
tape.
App. 28
The complete gasket for an access door or panel
will generally be made up by using strips of gasket material which must be joined together properly to prevent air leakage where the pieces come together. The
preferred method of joining gasket strips at the corners
is with a “dove tail” joint. The male dove tail should be
cut 1-inch wide at the top, and tapered to 5/8-inch wide
at the bottom. The female joint should be traced and
matched to each male end. Mark all gasket pieces to
avoid mis-matching dove tails during installation.
Using boiler sealing compound (see Section R) at
the gasket joint is a more common and simpler method
of sealing a joint but is not as effective as dove tails
since sealing compound after exposure to high heat for
a period of time becomes hard and brittle and thus
loses its sealing properties. To seal a joint with compound, first cut the gasket strips the desired lengths
and place on the boiler. Take a small amount of compound and press it into the joint of the gasket strips.
When the panel is replaced, the compound will be compressed into the joint. Boiler sealing compound can
also be used to temporarily seal a panel where distortion beyond the sealing capability of a regular gasket
material exists.
D-8-2. REPAIR OF CASING FASTENERS.
Frequent removal and installation of access panels for
inspection and cleaning will most likely necessitate repair of the fasteners which will hold the panels to the
boiler. Studs will be sheared off or their threads will
App. 29
become stripped. These conditions usually result from
an overtightening of the nut. Panels which are not frequently removed or those which have been exposed to
moisture may be difficult to remove because the nuts
have become “frozen” from corrosion.
NOTE
The use of an anti-seize compound (see Section T) on all threaded surfaces should be
standard procedure when installing casing.
This compound will withstand the temperatures of the boiler and resist corrosion and
thereby make removal easier. Application can
be accomplished with a thin acid brush since
only enough compound is needed to lightly
coat the threads of the stud or bolt.
a. Studs. Since the casing must be maintained
airtight, repair of broken or missing studs must be accomplished. A panel which is difficult to remove or install may have one or more bent studs. Determine
which direction the stud must travel in order to move
free in the panel bolt hole. Thread the proper size nut
on the end of the stud. Tap the nut lightly with a hammer to straighten the stud.
A die nut (see Section S) can be used to repair
threads which are not severely damaged. The die nut
should be threaded on as in tightening a regular nut.
Back the tool off 1/2 turn every two revolutions or even
more frequently if resistance is encountered. This allows the metal chips (if any) to become free of the cutting surfaces. If the nut is extremely loose on the stud
App. 30
(indicating shallow threads) after rethreading, the
stud should be replaced.
*
*
*
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.