Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.26s
Opposition Brief — Cornish Shipping Ltd. v. International Nederlanden Bank
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
James Fisher & Sons, Dh See acts Se be ce bo eae cee eas 8,9 The DIANA, 423 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1970) ............... 8,9, 10 The SATURNUS, 250 F. 407 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 247 U.S. … MOUNT SHASTA, 274 U.S. 466 (1927); Union Industrieile et Maritime v. Nimpex Int’l, Inc., 459 F.2d 926 (7th Cir. 1972); The DIANA, 423 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1970); American Steel Barge Co. v.
516 U.S. 867Opposition Brief — Miles, Inc. v. Sondergard
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Parke, Davis & Co., 423 F.2d 584 (1st Cir. 1970). Glater, 744 F.2d at 217. … Seymour, 423 F.2d at 586-87.
510 U.S. 814Opposition Brief — Arsberry v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) and Shaw v. Murphy, 121 S. … Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 348 (1987).
534 U.S. 1062Opposition Brief — Baraka v. McGreevey (No. 07-79)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
U.S., 386 U.S. 482, 490 (1932); Smiley v. Holm, 285 U.S. 355, 372-73 (1932). Indeed, petitioner does not dispute this. Petition at 13. … Bogan, supra, 423 U.S. at 55; Youngblood v. DeWeese, 352 F.3d 836, 841 (3d Cir. 2003).
Opposition Brief — Vandercreek v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
White, 423 U.S. 67 (1975), Vandercreek v. … White, 423 U.S. 67 | (1975).
488 U.S. 1009Opposition Brief — Forrester v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
United States (1959) 360 U.S. 295.........5 Smith v. United States (1975) 423 U.S. 1303....6 Stirone v. United States (1960) 361 U.S. 212....3 United States v. … U.S. (1975) 423 U.S. 1303. 7 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, respondent requests that thi- Court deny the petition for a writ of certiorari. Respectfully submitted, RICHARD L.
493 U.S. 1058Opposition Brief — Mayfair Construction Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Supreme Court, U.S. ay NOV 9 1988 No. 88-423 JOSEPH.F. SPANIOL, JR. … Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). Ih any event, as the court of appeals made clear (Pet.
488 U.S. 980Opposition Brief — Maynard v. United States District Court
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
Heebe, 482 U.S. 641 (1987).” Pet. App. 5. 5. … Friedman, 487 U.S. 59 (1988) ; Frazier vy. Heebe, 482 U.S. 641 (1987); Supreme Court v. Piper, 470 U.S. 274 (1985).
501 U.S. 1250Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 12, 2025
Harris, 550 U.S. at 380. … Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389, 397 (2015), and Graham, 490 U.S. at 396).
Opposition Brief — Willis v. City of Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Stewart, 488 U.S. 1 (1988) (per curiam), and Hewitt v. Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987). … See 482 U.S. at 759.
510 U.S. 1071Opposition Brief — Coughlin v. Benjamin
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), and O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1987)? 2. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), and O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1987), changed the applicable legal stand- ard.
498 U.S. 951Opposition Brief — Collyer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980) ...... 7 United States v. Roa, 24M.J. 297 (C.M.A. 1987) ...... 5 United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) .......... 7,9 United States v. … Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544, 557 (1980); United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 424 (1976); Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 227 (1973).
484 U.S. 1025Opposition Brief — Fambro v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Watson, 423 U.S. 411 (1976) Constitution and statutes: U.S. Const. Amend. IV 21 U.S.C. 846 Miscellaneous: 3 W. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 415-417 (1976) ; Gerstein vy. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 113 (1975).
502 U.S. 1072Opposition Brief — Littman v. Gimello
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Los Angeles Cty., 482 — U.S. 304, 107 S.Ct. 2378, 96 L.Ed. 2d 250 (1987) aleDeae Tee EEN Nae ee baukh ENA ME AbS esa eane™ 6, 8, 12, 13, 14 Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. … Los Angeles Cty., supra, 482 U.S. at 320, 107 S.Ct. at 2388, 96 L.Ed.2d at 267. 14 Accord, Agins v.
493 U.S. 934Opposition Brief — Boeing Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Roby
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003
Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 552 (1943); Bornstein, 423 U.S. at 314-15 (quoting Hess). … Bornstein, 423 U.S. at 314. Accord United States v.
539 U.S. 969Opposition Brief — Utah Division of State Lands v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Alaska, 423 F.2d 764, cert. denied, ESET 8,11 United States v. City of Anchorage, 437 F.2d 1081.. 8,11 United States v. Holt State Bank, 270 U.S. 49... 5, 7,10 United States v. … States of Alaska, 423 F.2d 764, 765, 766-767 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 967 (1970). 12 the West” (California v.
482 U.S. 193Opposition Brief — Mathew Martoma, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 26, 2019
Ct. 420, 423 (2016); see id. at 425 n.2. … Dirks, 463 U.S. at 662; see Salman, 137 S. Ct. at 423.
Opposition Brief — DeBose v. Nebraska
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999 (8th Cir. 1999), en banc, petition for cert. pending, No. 99-423. … Zimring, __ U.S. __, 119 S.Ct. 2176 (1999). The Court at no time addressed the Eleventh Amendment in Olmstead.
531 U.S. 1190Opposition Brief — Leggett v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
EEOC, 493 U.S. 182 (1990) 7 Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147 (1975) .......ssceesserees 6 Williams, In re, 963 F.2d 567 (3d Cir. 1992) 11 Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills Sch. … Weinstein, 423 U.S. at 149. Here, the grand jury completed its investi- gation, indicted Robert Angleton, and was terminated.
535 U.S. 1011Opposition Brief — Walker v. Anderson Electrical Connectors
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Hewitt, 482 U.S. at 761, 107 S.Ct. at 2676. … Hewitt, 482 U.S. at 760, 107 S.Ct. at 2675.
506 U.S. 1078
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.