Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

2.02s

  • Reply Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 3, 2025

    Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 440 (2006); see Robinson Supp.21-24. Appellees’ (at 11-13) federalism arguments are also misplaced. … See, e.g., Professors Amicus 7-24.

  • Appellants Brief — Railroad Comm'n of Cal. v. Los Angeles R. Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1929

    Railway, (1914) 24 Cal. … Columbus, 249 U. §, 399; Public Service Company v. St. Cloud, 265 U. S. 352.

    280 U.S. 145
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Seltzer v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

    ~ 97 122 4 NOV 24 1997 No OFFICE OF PHE CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA October Term, 1997 Richard L. Seltzer, Petitioner V. … Our reconsideration decision dated February 24, 1995, explains our position in this case.

    522 U.S. 1119
  • Motion to Dismiss — General Dynamics Corp. v. Marshall

    Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1979

    Thereafter, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal to this Court under Supreme Court Rule 11(1) with the Missouri Supreme Court on February 24, 1978. … Amerison, 399 S.W.2d 53 (Mo. 1966). And appellant's assertions alone will not sustain his burden of proof. State v. Mooring, 445 S.W.2d 303 (Mo. 1969); State v.

    441 U.S. 919
  • Opposition — Schifter v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976

    Petitioner contends (Pet. 21-24) that the agents had insufficient probable cause either to arrest him or to seize the boxes of stolen merchandise from his car. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 42-43. “December 5, 1975 Tr.” refers to the re-opened suppression hear- ing continued on that date.

    426 U.S. 920
  • Emergency Application — David Santiago Renteria, Petitioner v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Nov 15, 2023

    To the Honorable Samuel Alito, Associate Justice, and Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: INTRODUCTION David Renteria is due to be executed by Texas in about 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jose Luis Mattes Baez Carmona Lopez Cordero, Petitioner v. Connecticut Department of Correction, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 5, 2018

    Bank of Am., 723 F.3d 399, 403 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006)); see also Tracy v. … Nelson, 617 F.2d 9169 923-24 (2d Cir. 1980) (holding that inmates have no due process interest in avoiding classification that might preclude or delay benefits).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — George R. Durham, Petitioner v. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 15, 2019

    That petition was dismissed on the merits on August 24, 2015 (ECF No. 73). On May 5, 2016 a certificate of appealability was denied by the Court of Appeals (ECF No. 82). … relies on McQuiggin which he contends was a change in relevanfdecisional law and permits the review of the “extraordinary circumstance” which justify relief Under F.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6).2 In McQuiggjn at p. 399

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kyle Costello, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 18, 2018

    Woolfolk, 399 F.3d 590, 596 (4th Cir. 2005). This is known as the “ruse” exception. See United States v. Benitez, 34 F.3d 1489, 1494 (9th Cir. 1994). … KYLE COSTELLO, Appellant, --- Fed.Appx. ---- (2018) Costello's return to Pennsylvania until February 24, 2014, and even then continued to build the Commonwealth's case against Costello because he was

  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Commissioner of Immigration of Port of NY v. Gottlieb

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1924

    and travelers for curiosity or pleasure, nor to their legal wives or their children under sixteen years of age who shall accompany a re CIS >: ‘ wy ig RM A ee hr ae ar RN Oe eM Dae a ae Pe a _— 24 … White, 256 U.S. 399. JAMES M. BEck, Solicitor General. Joun W. H. Crim, Assistant Attorney General. Harry 8. RIDGELY, Attorney. FEBRUARY, 1923.

    265 U.S. 310
  • Prologue — Baldwin v. England

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    Chambers Test. at 399..Then he told her that she was at her full promotion potential as a GS-11 (a fact that is irrelevant to a GAD promotion). Chambers Dep. at 39. … Report of Investigation/ EEO Counselor's Report, November 24, 200, at 3; Chambers Dep. At 64. Mr.

    546 U.S. 979
  • Opposition Brief — Freedman v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1976

    C) is reported at 399 F. Supp. 668. JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on January 8, 1976. … its remand to the district t court for further proceedings, review of the instant case ~ : would be inappropriate at this time. : On the basis of the evidence offered at the hearing held i on July 24

    425 U.S. 992
  • Opposition Brief — MacLeod v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971

    Miriani, 422 F.2d 150, 153-154 (CUA. 6), certiovart denied, 399 U.S. 910: Feichtmetr v. United States, 389 F.2d 498 (CLA. 9): Hensley v. United States, 406 F. 2d 481, 484 (CLA. 10). … United States, 314 F, 24 306, 310, fn. 3 (CLA, 10); cf. Spies v. United Stctes, 317 U.S. 492, 497-498.

    402 U.S. 907
  • Prologue — Edmonds v. Department of Justice

    Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

    Raus, 399 F.2d 785 (4th Cir. 1968).................. 20, 21 vii Herring v. … United States, 444 U.S. 507 (1980) cessescssscssssessssee 24 Spock v. United States, 404 F. Supp. 510 EPID BO Fa piciivewscisiniiinictelocticaiaabspitiiniitpacdidebummdnsebiainiin 19 Tenet v.

    546 U.S. 1031
  • Opposition — Gibson v. Missouri (Nos. 77-6701, 77-6856, 6088, 6553, 7012)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

    D | fe JUL 24 1978 Or ape Beane! Gk RK — Supaché Coukt, U.S. Le SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERM, 1978 O. 77-6701 \ », S EN le ee Nc HERBERT BURNFIN, < Petitioner, rf Vv. … Respectfully submitted, JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General NANETTE LAUGHREY Assistant Attorney General Supreme Court Building Post Office Box 399 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 (314) 751-3321 ATTORNEYS

  • Reply Brief — Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Committee for Implementation of Textile Agreements

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978

    REPLY OF PETITIONER TO RESPONDENTS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI This reply, filed pursuant to Rule 24(4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court, responds to arguments first raised … Carter, 566 F.2d 396, 399 (1977). In each of these cases, a court held that the unavailability of the Customs Court acts to confer original jurisdiction on the district court.“ *In Timken Co. v.

    435 U.S. 933
  • Emergency Application — David Santiago Renteria, Applicant v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Nov 15, 2023

    To the Honorable Samuel Alito, Associate Justice, and Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: INTRODUCTION David Renteria is due to be executed by Texas in about 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.

  • Application — Robert Fratta, Petitioner v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Application · Jan 6, 2023

    Fratta , 2007 WL 2872698, at *24. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (plurality op.); see also Wainwright v.

  • Emergency Application — Richard Gerald Jordan, Petitioner v. Mississippi

    Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jun 20, 2025

    a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court has been denied or the time for filing such petition has expired, the court shall set an 4 execution date…”); See also Pet. for Cert. in No. 24 … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986). Additionally, a stay of execution is necessary to facilitate a thorough and meaningful review, protecting that same due process right.

  • Respondents Brief — Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984

    Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 (1981) .............45 le a 13, 14, 23, 24, 32, 39, United States v. Grandi, 424 F.2d 399 (2d Cir. 1970) ..... … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 48 (1970).

    466 U.S. 210

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.