Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Ladue v. Gilleo

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

WLF and AEF recognize that state and local govern- ments have a strong interest in regulating usage of their streets and sidewalks, in order to protect the public health and safety and to promote a clean … outy om amas pointedly in 7. for Vincent that the relief sought | plaintiffs (an exception from the sign-posting prohibition for political signs posted dusing the period immediately preceding an

Amicus Curiae Brief — California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

INTRODUCTION This Court is not writing on a clean slate. … Mondell’s comments were discussed, quoted and referenced in excruciating detail in the briefs presented to this Court in First lowa.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Illinois v. Wardlow

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

In Worcester, Massachusetts, the local civil nghts commission held a series of hearings at which troubling and substantial allegations of racial profiling and excessive force were aired.” … DAILY News, March 26, 1999. 17 five year period compared to white residents who were stopped an average of 1.53 times during the same period.”* In St.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jillian Ostrewich, Petitioner v. Teneshia Hudspeth, in Her Official Capacity as Harris County Clerk, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 19, 2023

Hirsen is a frequent media commentator who has taught law school courses on constitutional law. Co-counsel Deborah J. … Ostrewich, 72 F.4th at 97 (cleaned up); Burson, 504 U.S. at 202.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Securities and Exchange Commission, Petitioner v. George R. Jarkesy, Jr., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 28, 2023

interpretation of a passage from the third book of William Blackstone’s four-volume treatise, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND, which were published between 1765 and 1769; and its interpretation of Tull that Clean … that authority includes, as an appropriate incident, power to fix the period during which they shall continue, and to forbid their removal except for cause in the meantime.

Amicus Curiae Brief — R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc., Petitioner v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019

Nature, it turns out, is not 7 as clean-cut as the Employers would have the Court believe. … act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerald Lynn Bostock, Petitioner v. Clayton County, Georgia

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019

Nature, it turns out, is not 7 as clean-cut as the Employers would have the Court believe. … act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

After nine years of marriage, and during a period of stress, his attractions “skyrockted.” … What woman wouldn't want a husband that can cook, clean, and share the load of building a home together with children that love and respect him?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

After nine years of marriage, and during a period of stress, his attractions “skyrockted.” … What woman wouldn't want a husband that can cook, clean, and share the load of building a home together with children that love and respect him?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Auer v. Robbins

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

The Department received 398 comments on the proposal. 57 Fed. Reg. 37670 (1992). … The DOL classified the “suggested change” as “a significant departure from long- standing policy that is not substantiated by comment.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — reVamped LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company, et al., Petitioners v. City of Pipestone, Minnesota, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 12, 2026

The Lower Courts Failed to Apply The Federal Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983). Pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress acted to provide protection for rights guaranteed by the U.S. … Nor was that the first time the Court commented on the issue. In Barron v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Lands Council v. Babbitt

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Burlew: Reference is made to the provision of the Federal Farm Loan Act, as amended, relating to the availability of grazing privileges on public lands for the period of a loan if the base property … While the Federal Farm Loan Act permits real estate loans for a maximum period of forty years, we have felt it desirable to limit real estate loans to live- stockmen to not more than twenty years, especially

Amicus Curiae Brief — Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

And the constitutional issues raised by this case have already been thoroughly aired in many lower courts and are fully ripe for this Court’s review. I. … There must be time limits within which the decisionmaker is required to act, and applications must not be allowed to languish for an indefinite period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

[and] an act of legal or moral implementation: ENFORCEMENT.” WEBSTER’S NINTH NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY 637 (1983). … Will school officials have to preview the contents of a speech any time a speaker could potentially inject a sectarian or proselytizing comment into it?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hodgson v. Minnesota

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

iv v Judicial Branch of the Argentinian Government Given in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on the 2nd. day of June, 1989. … The eloquence of the wording in the norm I comment upon invalidates any other analysis.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

OE 4h kn OR WRT CA ove 8s passim Statutes: Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Ps Oe BOs i Si ie sea eee Oe passim §703, Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. … It did so by an act of prohibited sex discrimination." IV.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

See also Seahoard Air Line Ru. Vv. Seegers, 207 US. 7, 78 WHT 20 at 1415: Hawkins v. … corporation in committing the wrongful acts.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Xerox Corp. v. Tolliver

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Ct. 1677 (1988); Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criawell, 105 8. Ct. 2743 (1985); and Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston, 469 U.S. 111 (1985). … Page eee ee ee ee oom, 29 USC. § 216(b) _ „„ a 8} Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C pe ddl: & a — Ghee Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Midwest Air Traffic Control Service, Inc., Petitioner v. Jessica T. Badilla, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 10, 2022

No. 21-867 In The MIDWEST AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC., Petitioner, v. JESSICA T. BADILLA, ET AL. … In Africa, for example, the U.S. military has outsourced air reconnaissance operations to contractors.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

First, the states seek to assure that Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). … The First Circuit commented as follows: That a person with a disability is able to use medical knowledge or technology to overcome many of the effects of his illness (in Arnold’s case, by a continuing