Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., Appellees. PRESS ROBINSON, et al., Appellants, v. … Appellees (Br. 38) and Louisiana (Br. 18-24) contend that the same is true of Section 2. They are wrong; Section 2 contravenes neither commandment.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2025
Akins, 524 U.S. at 24. … Id. at 24−25.
Brief for the United States — United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
= oe 24 It was not legally barred by Washington law from entering Spokane. … Phillipsburg National Bank, 399 U.S. 350, 371.
418 U.S. 602Jurisdictional Statement — Hodgson v. Minnesota
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1971
Sinai Hosp. 111 (1954) 0. 24 Hall, Abortion in American Hospitals, 57 Am. J. Pub. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966) (1860 stat- ute). 3° NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415, 488 (1963). * Griswold v.
402 U.S. 968Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Handy v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)...... 7, 13, 24, 37, 40 —_ es eeE——eeEeEeEeEeEeeeeeeeeeeeee vi Cont. Cases Page People v. … Driscoll, 399 F 2d 135 (1968) "B10. 11, 24 U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) ..... 1, 12, 13, a, 18, 19, 3. 21 24, 27, 31, 32, 33,34 U.S. v.
409 U.S. 846Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 28, 2020
Uhl, 107 F.2d 399, 400 (2d Cir. 1939) (L. Hand, J.) … See supra at 22-24. 2. The modified categorical inquiry is not a “factual” one.
Opposition — Association of Massachusetts Consumers, Inc. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1976
New England Electric System, 376 F. 2d 399, reversed, 384 U.S. 176 3-4 Securities and Exchange Commission v. … App. 7, 52-53). 384 U.S. 176, reversing 346 F. 2d 399 (C.A. 1), and was re- affirmed in Securities and Exchange Commission v.
423 U.S. 1052Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Moore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399 (Or. 1993)....... 8 Pasiewicz v. Lake County Forest Preserve, a EE ED Sic ce ccccosoncecsceves 12 Street v. Surdyka, 492 F.2d 368 (CA4 1974) ....... 12 United States v. … Rodriguez, 854 P.2d 399, 409 (Or. 1993) (holding that even if an arrest were invalid under the Oregon Constitution, “[blecause the arrest in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment, the guns
553 U.S. 164Petition — ZITKO v. UNITED STATES (No. 77-622)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2d 467 ESS Ea ae er er eee See 15 See v. City of Seattle, 387 US 541 (1967) ........,.. 11, 13, 14, 15 Spinelli v. … Tyler, 399 Mich. 564, 250 N.W. 2nd 467 (1977 That case involved an administrative fire investigation statute and searches made pursuant thereto with a search warrant.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ibrahim McCants, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 1, 2019
Id. at 123–24 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 27). … Navarette, 572 U.S. at 399–401. The Court explained that the eyewitness’s firsthand knowledge of ongoing criminality “lends significant support to the tip’s reliability.” Id. at 399.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Brace v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
FCC, 24 F.3d 1441 (D.C. RR cai ial g wn ge bl e's bos @ va 3 18 E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train, 430 U.S. ER CRA REE ris ee a eee a ee oe 12 Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. … FCC, 24 F.3d 1441, 1445 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (construing statute to defeat administrative order that would give rise to takings).
515 U.S. 1158Respondents Brief — Afanzi v. Holder, (2008) (No. 906)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2008
Dec. 1 (Att’y Gen. 2009) ......... 6, 10, 14, 16 24 1. & N. Dec. 710 (Att’y Gen.), vacated, 251. & N. Dec. 1 (Att’y Gen. 2009)................ 6 Dakane v. … United States Att’y Gen., 399 F.3d 1269 ee ce hed en banks 6 ue oh oO 8b wee 13 Denko v. INS, 351 F.3d 717 (6th Cir. 2003) ............ 13 Fadiga v.
Jurisdictional Statement — Frank v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1959
Baltimore City Code (1950 Edition), Article 12, See: | RRS Me Ri ateerielsaicone eek Rita oer ON ese OPM i a OI Nre a Charter of Public Local Laws of Baltimore City | (1949 Edition), Section 6 (5), (11),'(24 … Laws of Maryland, 1953, Chapter 676. 2..0...00..00..000.... | Laws of Maryland, 1957, Chapter 399, ‘Section 4 ........ ‘United States Code, Title 28, Section 1257(2) ............
359 U.S. 360Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rose v. Mount Sinai Medical Center (No. 09-620)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
V Williams v Florida 399 U.S. 78, 80, n.5 1970...... 13 Houssami v Nofal, 578 So. 2d 495, 497 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) COURT RULES Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030 (2) ...19 ARTICLES "Tipping … Lexis 117; 24 Fla. L.
Brief for the United States — Perez v. United States (No. 05-596)
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 2005
Roper, 112 S.W.3d 397, 399 (Mo, 2003) (en bane), aff'd, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970).
Plaintiffs Brief — Wells v. Savannah
Supreme Court brief · Plaintiffs Brief · 1901
Mayor, ete., Savannah, 71 Ga., p. 399. … Mavor, ete., Savannah, 71 Ga., 398, 399.
181 U.S. 531Prologue — Ward v. Dretke (No. 05-914)
Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005
App. 2002) ....... 24 People v. Manners, 2004 WL 242920 (Mich. App. RRS a PCN a SMR Ne End RE ee Beare Rg a eee 24 Pickens v. Lockhart, 714 F.2d 3455 (8th Cir.1983) ........... 21 Rompilla v. … Ray, 828 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1987)........... 19 United States v.
Respondents Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 25, 2019
Fleming 61 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2011) ..................................19, 24 State v. Harper 823 P.2d 1137 (Wash. App. 1992) .........................40 State v. … Ryan 811 F.3d 292 (9th Cir. 2015) ................. 2, 22, 24, 26 Styers v. Ryan No. 2:98-cv-02244, 2012 WL 3062799 (D. Ariz. July 26, 2012) ............................. 22, 24, 38 Teague v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dixon v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) ........... 10, 13 Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974) ................. 11 Delaware v. Fensterer, 474 U.S. 15 (1985) ............. 22 Douglas v. … Berrio-Lodono, 946 F.2d 158 (1st Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1223 (1992).......... 24 United States v.
513 U.S. 986Brief for Respondent — Supt. of Insurance v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1971
Roto American Corporation, : 339 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1964) ... ara ceeroepeeetase aes nesrereres “19 Schoenbaum v. … ‘denied, 399 U.S. 909 (1970); Mutual Shares Cérporation v. Genesco, Inc., 384 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1967).
404 U.S. 6
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.