Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.02s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Overton v. Bazzetta
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
During the same period Pennsylvania developed a system in which prisoners were isolated during the entire period of imprisonment. … It is as if marijuana use were punished on the ground that such use acted as a gateway to the use of heroin, but heroin use itself was not similarly punished.
539 U.S. 126Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. … Board of Educ., 330 U.S. 1 (1947) (discussing history of religious liberty during colonial period in challenge to state busing scheme).
521 U.S. 507Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferguson v. Charleston
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
During the same time period, women were excluded from higher education out of concern that "the physiological effects of hard study and academic competition with boys would inter- fere with the development … to have microwave ovens checked for radiation leakage because of "talk that [the microwave] may be a modern menace," id. at 65; and to wear rubber gloves and avoid in- haling when using household cleaning
532 U.S. 67Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Seaboard Air Line, 233 U.S. NRE LAR Ne Re enna Cee Te 16 Barrett v. Van Pelt, 268 U.S. 85 (1925) ................. 11 Eddy v. … — 20 prior Bankruptcy Act was revised, the table says, “Com- pare with * * * ” (citing the pertinent section or sec- tions of the prior Act). B.
489 U.S. 235Amicus Curiae Brief — Clyde S. Bovat, Petitioner v. Vermont
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 19, 2020
Chaney, Comment, United States v. Carloss: An Unclear and Dangerous Threat to Fourth Amendment Protections of the Home and Curtilage, 95 Denv. L. … Id. at 614 (“Officer Cervantes did not explain why he swept these other apartments’ doors for drugs.”); id. at 622 (noting that the officers “conduct[ed] an open-air sweep of other apartment doors in the
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
A Comment on the INS Interim Rule 8 C.F.R. 287.3, 26 N.Y.U. … Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 697-98 (recognizing that lower courts interpreted statutory silence of the Immigration Act of 1917 to limit detention to a reasonable period).
544 U.S. 998Amicus Curiae Brief — Bush v. Vera
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Rights Act of 1965. … There are no residual losses from “bad” elections and redistricting schemes of the past: Each time a governmental entity redistricts its jurisdiction, the slate is cleaned.
515 U.S. 1172Amicus Curiae Brief — Norfolk Southern R. Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
When the bill of > Comments of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation on Senate bill, S. 504, a predecessor to Senate bill, S. 47 which became Pub. … Skyway Freight Systems, Inc., American International Air- wavs, Inc. and United Airlines, Inc., 235 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2000), the Second Circuit held at page 61 that as between an intermediary's bill
543 U.S. 14Amicus Curiae Brief — TENN. SEC. SCHOOL ATHLETIC v. Brentwood Acad.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
The clean distinction between sovereign state action and contractual state action makes much more sense than the Sixth Circuit’s haphazard taxonomy of government-citizen relationships. … In both roles, TSSAA acts as an educator and an education policymaker.
551 U.S. 291Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2018
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/30/17. Docket Numbers: ERlB-276-000. … The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284 2 Patent Act of 1790, ch. 7, 1 Stat. 109. 21 Patent Act of 1836, ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117 3 § 6, 5 Stat. 119 3, 22 Patent Act of 1962, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 792 (35 U.S.C. 1 … grace period to one year.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 2, 2026
Mary I at 994 (quoting Fulton at 533) (cleaned up) (emphasis added). Yet, for the courts below, Fulton proved no more of a barrier to Colorado than had Masterpiece Cakeshop. … The Act remains enshrined today as Article I, Section 16 of the Virginia Constitution.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Tucker
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
and publishes numerous periodicals, documents, and in-service legal training materials for use both by police officers ané executives. … We believe that this case presents a vehicle for the airing of the effects of this controver- sial case.
417 U.S. 433Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Air Regulatory Grp. v. … Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 1348. Ct. 2427 (2014). This case, which presents the doctrine of interna- tional comity, is a species of the genus.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Geren v. Omar, 128 S. Ct. 741 (2007) (No. 07-394)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
One detainee recently recounted, “(Iraqi guards] hung me in the air by my legs and beat me with a stick .... … A/6316 (Dec. 16, 1966), art. 7; Human Rights Committee, General Comment 20, art. 7, U.N. Doc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 14, 2024
Procedural rules are exempt from notice-and-comment rulemaking under § 533(b)(A) of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”).). … However, the USPTO implemented policy changes before the comment period ended, provided vague questions regarding its request for comment, and published retroactive changes shortly after the comment period
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2022
Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 18 (1989) on Non-Discrimination, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 (Nov. 10, 1989), ¶ 12. … See ICCPR, supra note 2, at art. 40 (outlining the requirements for States Parties and Committees to engage in periodic reports). 39 18 outcomes with article 25.” 40 In its fifth periodic report, the
Amicus Curiae Brief — NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
In the spring of 1989, three nurses believed that the facility was being run ineffectively and sought to air this matter with the nursing home administrator. … Nurses who adjusted schedules or assigned meal and break periods were also deemed supervisors. New Fairview, 206 N.L.R.B. at 749; Avon, 200 N.L.R.B. at 706.
511 U.S. 571Amicus Curiae Brief — Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (No. 08-1314)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
NHTSA Safety Tips for Using Child Restramt Systems, printed uv National Transportation Safety Board, Safety Study: The Performance and Use of Child Restraint Systems, Seatbelts, and Air Bags for Children … Reg. 63295, 63295 (L002) (noting that JPMA’s comments “represented the views of child restraint system manufacturers’).
Amicus Curiae Brief — KSR Intern. Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Art. 1, § 8, Cl. 8 (Patent Clause) ............ 2 Act of Apr. 10, 1790, ch. 7,1 Stat. 109 ............0005. 2 Act of Feb. 21, 1793, ch. 11,1 Stat.318 ................ 2 Act of July 4, 1836, ch. 357, … of Apr. 10, 1790, ch. 7, 1 Stat. 109; Act of Feb. 21, 1793, ch. 11, 1 Stat. 318; Act of July 4, 1836, ch. 357, 5 Stat. 117; Act of Mar. 3, 1839, ch. 88, 5 Stat. 353; Act of July 8, 1870, ch. 230, 16
550 U.S. 398
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.