Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.37s
Respondents Brief — United States v. Mitchell
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1980
Ferry County, 24 F. Supp. 399 I i I 40 United States v. Jackson, 280 U.S. 188 (1930)...... 45 United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1 (1969) .............. 12 United States v. … Ferry County, 24 F. Supp. 399, 400 (E.D.
445 U.S. 535Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 23, 1994
43307, 43308, 43309, 43311 91...................................................39711 189..................................................39395 257..................................................40836 399 … ...............39440 23 CFR 1212.................................................39256 1313.................................................40470 24
Opinion — William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1910
. ¢, 399, 29 Stat, 361,378. Under this act and that of August 3, ISS6, 6. … ISS7, ©. 359, 24 Stat. 505. known as the “Tucker Act.” vests the ( ‘ourt of Claims with jurisdiction to hear and determine sich claims.
216 U.S. 494Opposition Brief — Moore v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
Ramey, 24 F.3d 602 (4th Cir. 1994), petition for cert. pending, No. 94-5755 .........ccccccceeeeeees 4,5, 7 United States v. … Harris, 761 F.2d 394, 399-400 (7th Cir. 1985); United States v. Parodi, 703 F.2d 768, 784-785 (4th Cir. 1983).
514 U.S. 1102Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Historic Smithville Inn v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
o (RR. 24) can scarcely be the basis for making a finding of fact. 0 Also without, record evidence, the Trial Examiner with the Board’s approval conciuded that the questionnaire was predicated on the … Exh. 3; R. 115, 173, 220, 258-259, 265, 289-290, 294, 304, 327-328, 349, 391, 393, 399, 420-421, 422, 423). The Company knew nothing of Mrs.
397 U.S. 908Amicus Brief — Baldwin v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
Colo.), aff'd, 399 U.8. SOL (1970) .cccceedl,lS American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville, 379 S.W.2d 450 (Ky. Re Sedacebaeoeue es 60sueneeee Avery v. … City of Colorado Colo.), aff'd, 399 U.S. 901 (1970); City of Birmingham v. Community Fire District, 336 So. 2d 502, 507 (Ala. 1976).
464 U.S. 1012Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Natoli v. Hamilton
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1967
S. 261, 288 (1947) ........ 12 Fleming’s Estate, 265 Pa. 399, (1919) ..... eee 9, 15 Frew’s Estate, 340 Pa. 89, 91, 92 (1940) ........ 6 Gately v. … Yewdall, 95 U- S. 294, 24 L. ed. 436.
389 U.S. 825Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 20, 2018
The burglar also took $10 from another juror and $24 from her roommate." Id. at 317 t 2. … Mitchell, 690 F.3d at 146; see also Soils, 342 F.3d at 399.
Appellants Brief — United Air Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1952
S. 399, 400, 57 L. ed. 1541, 1542, 33 S. Ct. 729,48 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1151, Ann. Cas. 1916A 18); Edwards v. California, 314 U. S. 160, 176, 86 L. ed. 119, 126, 62 S. Ct. 164. … S. 485, 490, 24 L. ed. 547, 548; Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 631, 29 L. ed. 257, 200, 5 S. Ct. 1091; Bowman vy. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 125 U. S. 465, 481, 482, 31 L. ed. 700, 705, 706, 8 S.
342 U.S. 908Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Byron Lewis Black, Petitioner v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 1, 2025
Apr. 24, 2008) (Atkins claim). 7. Black v. Bell, 664 F.3d 81 (6th Cir. 2011) (remanding Atkins claim). 8. Black v. Colson, No. 3:00-0764, 2013 WL 230664 (M.D. Tenn. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
Jurisdictional Statement — In re Trapp
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1982
McVeigh, 93 U.S. 274 ... »© 2+ +2e*s2e ee 2 2 © © # © 8 44 in ce Winship, 397 0.8. 258 wee cee ever eee eeneees 24 Zablocki v. … Alsager, supra, 406 F.Supp. at 24, aff'd, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir. 1976). The Missouri Supreme Court indicated (App.
456 U.S. 967Supplemental Brief for Respondent — Phoenix Finance Corp. v. Iowa-Wisconsin Bridge Co.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief for Respondent · 1942
S. 605 ; 24 Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur vs. Couble et kaa: 255 U. s. 356 18 Toledo Scales Co. vs. Computing Scales Co., 261 U. S. 399, 43 Sup. Ct. Rep. 458 28, 29 Utah Power & Light Co. vs. U. … Ed. 419, 24 S. Ct. 259.
316 U.S. 641Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 30, 2020
Hitchcock, 185 U.S. 373 (1902)........ 20, 24 Moe v. … E., and Secs. 25, 26, 35, and 36, T. 6 N., R. 24 E.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Juan Manuel Contreras-Zamora, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 13, 2022
Moore, 131 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 1997) ............................................................... 13 v Jackson v. … Arizona, 440 U.S. 436 (1966) ........................................ 7, 8, 10, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27 Montejo v.
Jurisdictional Statement — Harrington v. California
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1941
Frame, 39 Ohio s 399, 413; Knowlton v. Moore, 44 L. Ed. 970, 975. … September 24, 1941 (7236)
314 U.S. 582Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 22, 2025
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)............ 7 Gill v. Whitford, 585 U.S. 48 (2018)...........cccccccceeeeee 22 Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77 (2010)............06. 16 Hodges v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 408 (1966); J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 8738, 879 (2011) (plurality). Among other rights, the Due Process Clause protects voting rights. Minor v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 24, 2025
Nos. 24-109, 24-110 In the Supreme Court of the United States LOUISIANA, v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., PRESS ROBINSON, et al., v. PHILLIP CALLAIS, et al., Appellant, Appellees. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 511 (2006) (LULAC) (Roberts, C.J., concurring in part, dissenting in part)), race-based districting under Section 2 of the VRA must end. ARGUMENT I.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Port of Tacoma, et al., Petitioners v. Puget Soundkeeper Alliance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 28, 2024
No. 24-350 In the Supreme Court of the United States PORT OF TACOMA, ET AL., Petitioners, v. PUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE, Respondent. … Manning, 578 U.S. 374, 399 (2016) (quoting Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 94 (2010)); 40 C.F.R. § 123.1(i)(2).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Terrance J. Tardieff, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2026
Id. at 24. … Doucet, No. 24-30656, 2025 WL 3515404 (5th Cir. Dec. 8, 2025) (unpublished) (attempted cultivation of marijuana).
Brief for the United Statesm — United States v. City of New Britain
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United Statesm · 1954
Pelzer, 312 U.S. 399 ;' 15 United States v. Rosenfield, 26 F. Supp. 433 14 United States vy. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 US. … Pelzer, 312 US. 399, 402-403; Helvering v. Stuart, 317 U.S. 154, 161.
347 U.S. 81
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.