Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.15s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 30, 2024
It’s a Workaround as U.S. … Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423 (2021). The Doctors have failed to meet that test.
Amicus Curiae Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2025
Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 423 n.20 (1976) (also citing Turpen, Hunter, and other cases); Richardson, 521 U.S. at 417 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Imbler). This Court in Briscoe v. … Briscoe, 460 U.S. at 335; see also Richardson, 521 U.S. at 418 (quoting Briscoe). E.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wallace v. Calogero (No. 05-1645)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
U.S. … Griffiths, 413 U.S. at 720 (quoting Truax, 239 U.S. at 41).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Takushia, 604 U.S. 428 (1902) .... ea tiet 10 Rurson vo. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (1992) ........ reaveest a Chanaler v. … Brown, 415 U.S. 724 (1974).
562 U.S. 1060Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2024
Giboney, 336 U.S. at 502. … Bell, 414 F.3d 474, 482 n.8 (3d Cir. 2005) (“Brandenburg clearly does not apply to the kind of unprotected or unlawful speech or speech-acts (e.g., aiding and abetting, extortion, criminal solicitation
Amicus Curiae Brief — Behrens v. Pelletier
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412, 423 (1988), asserting that the comprehensive regulation of the banking industry was a “special factor” counseling against 7 The district court applied a one-year statute of … Livesay, 4837 U.S. 463, 468 (1978)). See Cohen, 337 U.S. at 546.
516 U.S. 299Amicus Curiae Brief — Mock v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987); First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987); and Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 112 S. … Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922). Kaiser Aetna, 444 U.S. at 178.
517 U.S. 1216Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Chevron, 476 U.S. at 844. … Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985): MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County, 477 U.S. 340 (1986); First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987); Nollan v.
556 U.S. 208Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 8, 2025
Rafaeli, 952 N.W.2d at 482 (Viviano, J., concurring). For good reason—no such freestanding interest exists. … Tyler, 598 U.S. at 638.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 22, 2026
Dep’t of Def., 601 U.S. 480, 482 (2024). That characterization is precise. The Board does not make policy. It does not promulgate substantive regulations. … Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 46–47 (1975) (quoting In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2025
Automotive sales are a critical part of the U.S. economy. … Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 482–83 (1993) (granting review of important federal question that had created a “conflict of authority among state high courts”). 17 factual underpinnings of Woldeyohannes are
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2018
Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 482 (1965); see also Leo Strauss, Bertolt Brecht, Thomas Mann, Marlene Dietrich, Jacob Riis, Elie Wiesel, Vladimir Nabokov, Isabel Allende, Czesław Miłosz, Reinaldo Arenas, Nuruddin … Chicago, 337 U.S. 1, 4 (1949)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 12 (1967) to Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374, 384 (1978) and Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 99 (1987), this Court has held that the freedom to marry is a fundamental right. … In Turner, supra, the Court recognized that a state could restrict an inmate’s constitutional rights, but nonetheless struck as “facially invalid” its ban on inmate marriages. 482 U.S. at 99.
576 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Co., 349 U.S. 254 (1955). … Jd. at 481-482 (quoting Maneja, 349 U.S. at 265).
517 U.S. 392Amicus Curiae Brief — Martin v. Hadix
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
Fie/d, 516 U.S. at 75. … Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987). 16 In sum, plaintiffs have nothing more than a subjective expectation that they will recover any particular fee prior to actually receiving an award under § 1988.
527 U.S. 343Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Commerce, et al., Petitioners v. New York, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2019
Consumers Union of U.S., Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 511 (1984). … Id. at 448-68, 482-85.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edwards
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
U.S. 559 (1996); Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1, 18 (1991); TXO Prod. Co. v. Alliance Res. Corp., 509 U.S. 443 (1993). … U.S. Const. amend. VUI.
538 U.S. 974Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 27, 2026
DNC, 589 U.S. 423, 424 (2020) (per curiam)). If they do, “this Court, as appropriate, should correct that error.” RNC, 589 U.S. at 425. … Purcell, 549 U.S. at 4-5.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. Romein
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1 (1977). … Spannaus, 438 U.S. at 242. See also Pension Benefit Guaranty Fund v. R. A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717 (1984); United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. at 22.
500 U.S. 915Amicus Curiae Brief — Douglas v. California Pharmacists Association, (2009) (No. 1158)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
The U.S. … Dublino, 413 U.S. 405, 423 n.29 (1973) (applying preemption analysis but finding no inconsistency, noting that “(clonflicts [in Social Security Act programs], to merit judicial rather than cooperative
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.