Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Petition — Blanco v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Weatherford, (1945) 27 Cal. 2d 401 iii. 2, 24, 25 27 27 27 28 28 2, 24, 25 27 Rogers v. … Rhay (1972) 399 U.S. 128; Argersberger v. Hemlin (1972) 407 U.S. 25; Mills v. Municipal Court (1973) 10 Cal. 3d 288, 300.
439 U.S. 966Joint Appendix — Oklahoma v. Castleberry
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1984
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 90 S.Ct. 1975, 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); Whitehead v. State, 546 P.2d 273 (OkI.Cr.1975;.
469 U.S. 979Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Masin v. Drain
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
to writing August 29, 1978, an oral offer from David Boggs which Ruth Drain had accepted August 24. … Komoroske for A-24 Plaintiffs and Appellants. Simon & Sheridan and Wilfred A. Hearn, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.
475 U.S. 1013Amicus Curiae Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)... _.. Sainte ot 2 General Motors v. Romein, 503 U.S. 181 (1992)... .... 8 Gomez v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 503 U.S. 653 (1992)........... 14 Hill v. … L. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, effective April 24, 1996.
523 U.S. 637Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 NE Ts Sa ciblavidpnksarivadsndidéseadubuseivckindue 8 MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Lid., 125 S. … Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325, 1339 (Fed.
550 U.S. 437Amicus Curiae Brief — United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Ed. 1233 (1951) Gees re eere ee 8, 11 C&A Carbone, Inc v Town of Clarkstown, $11 U.S 3838, 114S Ct 1677, 128 L Ed 2d 399(1994) . … Town of Hallie v City of Eau Claire, 471US 34,1058 Ct 1713, 85 L Ed 2d 24 (1985) . Tyler v Pipe Indus v Wash State Dept of Revenue, 483 U.S 232 (1987) .
550 U.S. 330Amicus Curiae Brief — California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
Hahn, 399 F.2d 987 _ (C.AD.C., 1968) 10 eee Lumber Co. v. Rowley, 326 U.S. 295 (1945) . 13 | Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) 13, 14-15, 16, 17, 18, 19 © Liner v. … Hahn, 399 F.2d 987, 989-990 (C.A. D. C., 1968). Thus, these statutes are consistent with the position devel- oped herein, rather than with § 1335.
402 U.S. 121Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Wright v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1969
(Tr. p. 24). … pp. 24-34).
394 U.S. 961Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sullivan v. Wirtz
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1966
(R. pgs. 24-31, Appendix F) -. … S. 399, 5 L Ed. 2d 633, 81 S. C. 567;_reh. Den. 365>U. S. 890, 6 L ed. 2d 200, 81 S. @. ee ee -” "eh 10245 Meeker vs. Ambassador, 375 U.S. 160, 84 S.
385 U.S. 852Opposition Brief — Griffin v. McCoach
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1941
State Bank of Keokuk, 24 S. W. 564, an attachment lien had been foreclosed upon the sepa- rate property of a married woman. … Dunken, 266 U. 8. 389, 399. Head, 234 U. S. 149; Bond v. Hume, 243 U.
313 U.S. 498Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2019
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................. 17 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. V................................................ 13 U.S. CONST. amend. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970), a statute may appear to extend to all defendants the chance to limit their confinement by paying a fine, yet this presents an “illusory choice” for any indigent who is without
Amicus Curiae Brief — Linda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 12, 2019
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ....................................... 14, 21 Maryland Citizens Comm. for Fair Cong. Redistricting, Inc. v. Tawes, 253 F. Supp. 731 (D. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 423 (2006) (plurality) [hereafter, “LULAC”].
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 9, 2023
III.... 24 U.S. Const, amend. V. 2, 22 (vii) Table of Cited Authorities Constitutional Provisions Page 2, 22 U.S. Const, amend. … On March 24, 2022, Mr. Alls filed an amended motion for reconsideration and for rehearing of prior orders. In Mr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Henry Schein, Inc., Applicant v. Archer and White Sales, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2020
DynMcDermott Petroleum Operations Co., 687 F.3d 671, 675 (5th Cir. 2012). 24 AM. … No. 399.) In Schein v.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Feb 27, 2025
State, 413 So. 2d 24, 25-26 (Fla. 1982) ("Jennings P). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). 11 Jennings does not meet such an exception.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Keith Pharms, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 17, 2026
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965)..................................................8 Southern Union Co. v. … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 31 (1965); see also Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Batson v.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 31, 2022
United States, 365 U.S. 399 6 28 STATUTES AND RULES 28 U.S.C.S. 2244 Passim 28 U.S.C.S. 2244(b) 30 28 U.S.C.S. 2244 (d) (1) (A) 9 28 U.S.C.S. 2254 9, 30 28 U.S.C.S. 2254 (a) Passim OTHER … United States, 365 U.S. 399, 401 ("We grant certiorari to consider the petitioner's claim the Court of Appeals had misconceived the meaning of the Barenblatt decision.").; Braen v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Beecher Montgomery, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 10, 2026
Id. at *22-24. (Finley J. Dissenting). Therefore, this issue is not foreclosed. … See Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) & Texas Rule of Hividence 803(24).
Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, 138 S. Ct. 1800 (2018) (No. 17-432)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
BOIUD) cc. . cccccccccccccccssccscoscsees 24 Smith v. Bayer Corp., ee es Er inccrcntccsinsss vacdosnsonciascs 6, 22, 23, 24 Taylor v. Sturgell, I a cclmsiencinninnt’ 24 Tyson Foods, Inc. v. … Id. at 399 (emphasis in original). Rather, it “permits all class actions that meet its requirements|.|” /d. at 401.
Amicus Curiae Brief — China Agritech, Inc., Petitioner v. Michael H. Resh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2018
Colo. 2012) ......................... 24 Ford v. Ford Motor Co., 2014 WL 12570925 (C.D. Cal. 2014) ..................... 24 Griffin v. … Id. at 399 (emphasis in original). Rather, it “permits all class actions that meet its requirements[.]” Id. at 401.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.