Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1984

10,000+ results

0.38s

  • Petition — Grace v. Butterworth

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

    Garcia, Mass. 399 N.E. 2d 460 (1980)........ 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 15, 24, 25, 26. oh 28, 30, 32 -V= Commonwealth v. … Garcia, __Mass.__, 399 N.E. 2d 460 (1980), (set out in relevant parts at App 78-86) in which, again, the same trial judge's charge defining reasonable doubt in terms of specific examples in jurors

    452 U.S. 917
  • Opposition Brief — Shibley v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1956

    Ge oe ae Ss ee he ere ee 20, 21, 23 ORT WAS ME. cc eee ue bees ntectseaeanace Ge ems 20, 24 BO Bi ee, ER ona ncnina ne on Sent d ee cues sc aee 20, 24 Ee NS RR eee re eee 14 Deering’s California Penal … (23) 24 18 U.S.

    352 U.S. 873
  • Opinion — Ray v. Blair

    Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1952

    Code 1950 (Michie, 1949) §§ 24-367, 24-369; 3 Miss. Code Ann. (Harrison, 1943) § 3129; Del. Laws 1944-1945, ¢. 150, amending Rev. Code Del. 1935, ¢. 58, 1782, §14; La. Rev. … Code 1950 (Michie, 1949) §§ 24-367, 24-369. See Westerman v. Mims, 111 Tex. 29, 227 8. W. 178, dis- cussing Art. 3096 of Tex. Rev. Stat. of 1911; cf. Love v. Wilcor, 119 Tex. 256, 28 S.

    343 U.S. 154
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Evangelisto Ramos, Petitioner v. Louisiana

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 7, 2018

    Law Rev. 361, 375 (2012) .... 24 S. … Williams, 399 U.S. at 97. The subsequent historical record suggests that this explanation is correct.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Cox Communications, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sony Music Entertainment, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2025

    No. 24-171 In the Supreme Court of the United States —————— COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL., v. Petitioners, SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ET AL., —————— Respondents. … Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1966) .......................12 Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 605 U.S. 280 (2025)................................................9 Sony Corp. of Am. v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Lamont Coleman, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 18, 2025

    United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) ..................................................7 Southern Union Co. v. … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 31 (1965); see also Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Batson v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 21, 2025

    Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .............. 6, 9, 12 Eli Lilly & Co. v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012); see Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc., 496 U.S. 661, 676 (1990).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Damar D. Ruffin, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 30, 2025

    United States, No. 24-5438. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-410, 106 S.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Letitia James, Attorney General of New York

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 30, 2026

    United States, 567 U.S. 387, 399-400 (2012) (quoting Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1941)). … Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399-400 (quoting Hines, 312 U.S. at 67).

  • District of Columbia v. Heller: The Supreme Court and the Second Amendment

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Sep 5, 2008

    Even though the decision did not result in the invalidation of any laws, it marked the first time that 23 Id. at 260. 24 Id. at 227. 25 Id. at 260. 26 Id. at 261. 27 Id. at 264-65. 28 Id. at … . 56 Id. at 399. 57 Id. at 399. 58 Id. at 399. 59 Id. at 400. 60 Id. at 400. 61 Id. at 401.

    RL34446Congressional Research Service
  • motion to dismiss — Corbitt v. New Jersey

    Supreme Court brief · motion to dismiss · 1978

    .:..ececcccsvssesesanessseres 24, 26 State v. Williams, 39 N.J. 471, 189 A.2d 193 (1963), oort, Gam, BIG Wis. GED CED ccccsaccnassascssvisnsncehensicnits 24 TABLE OF VONTENTS Vv PAGE Thomas v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 83 (1970).

    439 U.S. 212
  • Opposition Brief — Bell v. Thompson

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010

    See Docket 00-5516, 5/24/00 Application for a COA. 3. … appeals recognized, “[t)he evidence Thompson submitted was undoubtedly a Thus, evenif Van Tran is an appropriate application of ford, the Tennessee Supreme Court failed to apply it correctly here 24

    562 U.S. 831
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilligan v. Morgan

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

    Law Review 399, 408-16 LE | OI aE ABE'S ACE NE te Si 78 i aR BO a 11, 20 Maitland, Constitutional History of England 266-28 RAMs fs ee dacs i PE ERE N EOE el ab eg 4 Note, The Federal Injunction as … Law Review 399, 408-16 (1972).

    413 U.S. 1
  • Appellees Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 2005

    Ex. 141 (Gaddie expert report) at 3, 19, 24. 33 was reasonable); Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropoli- tan Housing Dev. … Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (19664)............ 14, 21, 22, 24 Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore v.

    546 U.S. 1074
  • Appendix — DuBois v. City of College Park

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

    Mundt, 403 U.S. 182, 91 S.Ct. 1904, 29 L.Ed.2d 399 (1971); Hadley v. Junior College District, 397 U.S. 50 90 S.Ct. 791, 25 L.Ed.2d 45 (1970); Avery v. … Mundt, 403 U.S. 182, 91 S.Ct. 1904, 29 L.Ed.2d 399 (1971); Hadley v.

    459 U.S. 1146
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

    (St. 423-24.) … Titus, 431 F. 24 1254 (3d Cir., 1970); Carter v.

    416 U.S. 312
  • Supplemental Brief — Rummler v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1975

    App.3d TTT ccsicctsesitmciiieniteneiscctiiataataaimaapaiitaiatiiaa iaiaaitaaitaililatl 24 Seusteen v. … By inference it also rejected the doctrine of Williams v Florida (1970) 399 U.S. 78 wherein this Court with the exception of Mr.

    423 U.S. 804
  • Petition — Alarshi v. Illinois

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

    Wixon, 326 US 135 (1945) 200... 24, 26 Bruten v. US., 391 US 123 (1968) —.......................... 16,18 California v. Green, 399 US 149 (1970) —..0..... 18, 19 Chambers v. … — 19 the declarant. (399 U.S. at 161, 162; emphasis sup- plied; ft.nt. omtd.)?7 Next came Dutton. In Dutton v.

    439 U.S. 912
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Grutter v. Bollinger

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

    Jackson Bd. of Educ., 476 U.S. 267, ee 24, 26 Vick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) ...cscc-.. 15,17 OTHER AUTHORITIES James E. … Rev. 379, 385-399 (1979); Nathan Glazer, Diversity Dilemma, The New Republic, June22, 1998, at http://www.tnr.com/ archive/0698/062298/glazer062298. html.

    539 U.S. 306
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Coston Supply Co. v. Pabellon

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1951

    t t *. 4e FILED OCT 24 1951] Supreme Court uf the Anite States ee OCTOBER TERM, 1951 CHARLES ELMURc crores oe 399 ALEJANDRO sides: Damien: basis Plaintiff- Respondent, against Grace Live Inc., … Local Law is in Conflict With the Opinion Below 24 D.

    342 U.S. 893

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.