Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Minnifield v. Louisiana Department of Education (No. 06-1512)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Martin, 375 U.S. 399. … For the reasons stated below, it is recommended that the School Board’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 24) be GRANTED.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James King, Petitioner v. Douglas Brownback, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 27, 2019

Driver, 411 F.2d 436, 448–449 (2d Cir. 1969). 19 Lake Country, 440 U.S. at 399. … Id. at 399–400 (footnote omitted).

Appellants Brief — Little v. Streater

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1981

Supp. 679, 406 A.2d 873, cert. denied, 177 Conn. 753, 399 A.2d 526 (1979). … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 242 (1970). This Court observed in Harper v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Thomas McCowan, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 3, 2026

Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) ........................................................................... 34 Zherka v. … II ................... i, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 22, 23, 24, 26, 38 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) .... i, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34,

Opposition Brief — Lanham Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on August 24, 2004. The jurisdiction of this court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). . STATEMENT 1. … Kia Motors America, Inc., 357 F.3d 392, 398-399 (3d Cir. 2004). The next step is typically to examine the defendant’s petition for removal. Mehlenbacher, 216 F.3d at 296.

Opinion — Munsey v. Webb

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1913

A. 399. To the same effect are: Reeves vy. Wallace, 10 Wall. 176; Morrison vy. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 293; Cuff v. N. & M. Y. R. Co., 35 N. J. L. 18; Smith v. Kanawha County (West Va.), 8 L. R. … (Va.), 24 8. E. Rep. 467; Fowlks v. Southern Ry. Co. (Va.), 32 8. E. Rep. 464; Winfree v. Jones (Va.), 51 S. E. Rep. 153; S. C., 1 L. R. A. (N. S.), 201.

Reply Brief — Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chittum

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996

with evidence of Chit- tum’s likely future pay increases, R. 292A-292E, as well as his inability to increase the retirement pension annuity he would re- ceive after his disability annuity expired, R. 399 … Respondent’s tortured history of the Culver case, Opp. 23-24, does nothing to reduce the relevance of this issue under the LHWCA.

Opinion — Nadal v. May

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1914

The validating act of February 24, 1903, was not ef- fectual. … Eq. 394, 399; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Texas, 170 U. 8. 243, 261. See also Gunn v. Barry, 15 Wall. 610, 622; Ar- nett v. Reade, 220 U.S. 311, 320.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Hostetter v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1941

Herbert Hostetter, (Unre- ported opinion of the Orphans’ Court)..... 19 In re Estate of Miller, 184 Cal. 674.............. 11 In re Estate of Rath, 10 Cal. (2d) 399.......... 11 In re Heilbron Bros … A. 413........ 24 Lentz v. Commissioner, 21 B. T. A. 1336, 1342.. 24 Quinn v. Union Nat. Bk., 32 Fed. (2d) 762...... 13 United States v. Kombst, 286 U.S. 424......... 11 Washburn v.

Reply Brief — Carlos Javier Pedroza-Rocha, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 22, 2020

BIO 21–24. This misinterprets Mendoza-Lopez. … Contrary to the government’s assertion, BIO 24–25, he meets the remaining § 1326(d) requirements.

Respondents Brief — Joshua Clay McCoy, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated as a Class, et al., Petitioners v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 8, 2025

Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 399-400 (1975). The court of appeals, however, reversed the grant of class certification. See Pet. App. 6a n.1. … See Pet. at i-ii, Wolford, supra (No. 24-1046).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jonathan Carvalho, Petitioner v. Steven Kenneway, Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Shirley

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 18, 2022

Garabedian, 399 Mass. 304313 ' .(1987). … See id^. at 399.

Opposition Brief — Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Buck

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985

(Reply Brief for Appellants, at 24-25.) … Though Hall states this as a separate issue (Petition for Certiorari, at 23-24), it is essentially a restatement of Hall’s request for an “independent review.”

Opposition Brief — Stavropoulos v. Firestone

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005

Norton, 350 F.3d 399 (3d Cir. 2003)......... 11, 12 Cole v. Me. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 1, 350 F. Supp. 2d I eae lial alid adele saeedgtines 9 Coszalter v. City of Salem, 320 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. … (Record 123: 23-24). According to committee member Lanny Webb, Petitioner became very upset and hysterical. He “remem- ber[s] papers were in the air and her voice was raised.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Basey v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Petitioner was tried before a jury on November 22-24, 1971. Decision on petitioner’s motion for judgment of ac- quittal at the close of the government’s case was reserved. … Bishop, 367 F.2d 806 (24 Cir. 1966). Some courts allocate the burdens but do not quantify them. United States vs, Prieto-Olivas, 419 F.2d 149 (5th Cir. 1969); Kivette vs.

Opposition Brief — Camerarts Publishing Co. v. Prather

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939) . ih eicadaitieiaaies 4 Douglas v. Cunningham, 294 U.S. 207 (1935) Freudenthal v, Hebrew Pub. Co., 44 F.Supp. 754 (S.D.N.Y. 1942) _....... sisi ‘ai . 19 F.W. … Bruns Publications, Inc., 28 F.Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1939), it is not clear from the reported decision whether the court awarded actual profits and damages or damages under the 5 ‘tin lieu of’’ clause

Amicus Brief — United States v. Rutherford

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979

THE USE BY A TERMINALLY ILL CANCER PATIENT OF LAETRILE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A PHYSICIAN INVADES THE PATIENT'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY ............eceeees CT 5 ha Gees coeabeeaevenens I¥0 ee neas 16 24 … United States, 399 F.Supp. 1208, 1211 (W.D. Okla. 1979), 424 F.Supp. 105106 (W.D. Okla. 1977).

Petition — Nolan v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

First National Bank 96 Md. 399, 54 A.68 €1903). . . 9 Burton Builders, Inc., v. L& S&S Construction Co. 260 Md. 66, 271 A.2d. 534 (1970) .10 DiGiorgio Importing & S.S. Co. v. Penn. R.R. … In this instance, the admission of the letter(without proper foundation) seriously impinged on that right. 3+ (COREG) 2eag5 Was 2ee Ohl A. 24. 397 (1966).

Opposition — Mobil Oil Corp. v. Higginbotham

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

SIS, Saeed 20 The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 , . 10 The Hamilton, 207 U.S. 398, 52 L.Ed. D ² ˙ Ddn!nUd——A. „ 39.14 The Harrisburg, 119 U.S. 199, 30 L. Ed. e 4,8 White v. … The Four Sisters, 75 F.Supp. 399 (O. Mass. 1947).

Opposition Brief — Haddle v. Garrison

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88 (1971) ..... 15 In re New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, Re ee ee 5 Irizarry v. Quiros, 722 F.2d 869 SE Nc 6 GhSd kek cerecepa’e 10, 11, 12, 21,22 Keating v. … Ga. 1986), aff'd, 807 F.2d 926 i Pt cine dec gudshcasws el sat 23, 24 Morast v. Lance, 807 F.2d 926 Mei ciscecsdubsdeceusiwows passim Portman v.