Documents

Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Melquist v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1963

page 2), even thongh he admits that the testimony with regard to the “floor” was in eonfliet. ( Petition, page 2 ° ’ - ~ of fact 3 Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores vo Ellerman Lines, 369 ULS Soo, 308-399 … A eor- a ix the “two court’ dgetrine, which militates strongly 24) against reviewing evidence when findings of facet have been concurred in hy the two courts below, Kw. . Corn Products Ret.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Angelus Funeral Home v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969

The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on May 24, 1969. The _ jurisdiction of this Court is inv oked under 28 U.S. … United States, 399 F. 2d 757 (CA, 7). certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1118. .

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Naquan Reyes, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 6, 2020

Williams, we said that review of a sentencing error is "fundamentally different" from review of a jury trial error. 399 F.3d at 456. … state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence, and, if the sentence . . . is of the kind, and within.the range, described in subsection (a)(4), and that range iSxceeds 24

Supplemental Brief — William Earl Sweet, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Nov 17, 2020

The Court ordered Sweet to respond, Doc. 24, which Sweet did on August 21, 2010, see Petitioner’s Response to Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Response; Doc. 27). … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), that the petitioner was incompetent to be executed, because the claim was not ripe at the time the petitioner filed his original habeas petition.

Reply Brief — Colby McCoggle, Petitioner v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 10, 2025

No. 24-6402 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES COLBY MCCOGGLE, PETITIONER v. … Williams, 399 F.3d 450, 456 (2d Cir. 2005)) (emphasis added). 4. The State’s cases support our position, not theirs.

Appellees Brief — Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. Gibbons

Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1982

No. 96-254, 94 Stat. 399. … R., supra, 328 U.S. at 536, New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 491-92 (1970).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sylvanus v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1952

U.S., 24 Fed. (2) 399 (404-5) (C. A.8)....... 36 Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 324 U. S. 515 (528).................. 34 Ex Parte Collett, 337 U. … S., 24 Fed. (2) 399 (404-5) (C. A. 8). The acts charged in the indictment here to be ‘‘overt acts’’ (R. 17-18) are set forth at pages 12-13, ante.

Petitioners Brief — Neil v. Biggers

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972

Beamer on cross-examination mentioned she had testified at the juvenile court (R. 24). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970).

Petition — Celebrezze v. Anderson

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Salera, 424 U.S. 959 (1976), aff’g 399 F.Supp. 1258 (E.D. … Tucker, 399 F.Supp. 1258 (E.D. Pa. 1975), aff’d, 424 U.S. 959 (1976).

Brief for the United Statesm — United States v. City of New Britain

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United Statesm · 1954

Pelzer, 312 U.S. 399 ;' 15 United States v. Rosenfield, 26 F. Supp. 433 14 United States vy. Security Trust & Savings Bank, 340 US. … Pelzer, 312 US. 399, 402-403; Helvering v. Stuart, 317 U.S. 154, 161.

Reply Brief — Harold R. Berk, Petitioner v. Wilson C. Choy, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 29, 2025

Co., 559 U.S. 393, 399 (2010); Hanna v. Plumer, 380 U.S. 460, 471 (1965). Multiple Rules “answer the same question[s]” Delaware’s law answers. A. … Shady Grove, 559 U.S. at 399. The conflict “inquiry is a functional one.” Pledger, 5 F.4th at 522 (citing Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Woods, 480 U.S. 1, 4-5 (1987)).

Reader Aids

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 19, 1994

...............51887 1316.................................................51887 22 CFR 40...................................................51367 24 … ..........................................52133 540..................................................52133 47 CFR 0....................................................50167 24

Cite as 29 I&N Dec. 313 (BIA 2025)

Agency decision · Agency decision

Matter of O-S-G-, 24 I&N Dec. 56, 57–58 (BIA 2006). … Id. at 57; Matter of Cerna, 20 I&N Dec. 399, 402 n.2 (BIA 1991); see also INA § 240(c)(6)(C), 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C) (2018) (providing that a motion to reconsider must specify the errors of law or fact

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Morgan v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969

The Opinions of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (R-430) are reported at 380 F.2d 915 and 399 F.2d 93. … Copies of the opinions are appended to this petition in the Appendix at pages 13-24 anid 27-29. JURISDICTION.

Brief for the Federal Communication Commision in Opposition — Federal Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Federal Communication Commision in Opposition · 1959

sion ‘is reported at 24 F. C. … OPPOSITION pose ke) P Oe aoe . : tee OPINIONS BELOW | a ‘The opinion of the court ss (Pet. a 25-28) is reported at 266 F.24 922.

Transcript of Record — United States v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co. (No. 22)

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1945

Nov. 24, 1986... 0.0 :360 305, 5 or ae No. 18- Agreeme nt between D. & C. Navi ee *. tion Co. and T.-J.. Me¢ ‘arthy Steamship . e. : Co., Feb. 18, 1937 362 = 306. No. 19—Contract bet ween T. … ¢ Transcript on rehearing -, eriede . 472 “394 Caption and appearances ond 472 ..399- Testimony of — ; ei" 4s rae ee ae * Timothy J. MeC ‘arthy (recalled) - ' 474 +400 Pere Me J.

Record and brief — Illinois v. Gates

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1983

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42(1970) ....... 7, 18, 19, 20, 24, 27 Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959) ..... 7, 13, 17, 2i, 23 Dunaway v. … App. 3d 995, 322 N.E. 24 399 (1975). % Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972); Brinegar v. U.S., 338 U.S. 160 (1949); Carroll v. U.S., 267 U 132 (1925) ; Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42.

Safety Zones; Northern California and Lake Tahoe Area Annual Fourth of July Fireworks Events

Federal Register · Rule · Jun 28, 2019

Coast Guard; telephone (415) 399-3585, email SFWaterways@uscg.mil. … Location The fireworks will be launched from shore along the Carquinez Strait at approximate position 38°01′32″ N, 122°08′24″ W.

Opposition Brief — Leeds v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1948

JURISDICTION The judgment of the court below was entered on April 5, 1948 (R. 23-24). The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on June 30, 1948. … S. at 399). In the case at bar, the effect of the sequestrations is not shown.

Prologue — Lick Fork Marina, Inc. v. Indiana

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

American National Bank & Trust Co., 78 Il. 2d 353, 362, 399 N.E.2d 1295, 1299, 35 Ill. Dec. 767 (1980) ..... TENG pera ban are EN eae Oras 17 Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255, 78 L. … Pacard, BP Wie Sd Ce hes 1, 7, 8, 18, 19, 24, 25 Warner/Elektra/Atlantic Corp. v. County of DuPage, (CA7 ILL) 991 F 2d 1280, reh, en banc, den. (CA7 ILL) 1993°US Apo.