Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Serer iT7 air? … McConnell, The Importance of Humility in Judi- cial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin’s “Moral Reading” of the Constitution, 65 Fordham L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Pung, Personal Representative of the Estate of Timothy Scott Pung, Petitioner v. Isabella County, Michigan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 20, 2026

Michigan’s General Property Tax Act illustrates the basic structure. … It is common for the county to have to clean up, remediate, or demolish personal property in order to bring many tax forfeited properties up to a “saleable” condition or a condition which would interest

Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

The analogy between sex discrimination cases and miscegenation cases has confused some commentators, because they assume that the Court’s holding in Loving v. … Comment. 405 (2007); Steven G. Calabresi & Livia Fine, Two Cheers for Professor Balkin’s Originalism, 103 Nw. U. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

The average beginning-to-end falloff rate in this period is thus 24 percent. … Gingles concurrence should play no part in the Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jean Francois Pugin, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 24, 2023

Hawkes Co., Inc., 578 U.S. 590 (2016) (judicial review of agency interpretation of Clean Water Act); Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. 120 (2012) (same); Rapanos v. … Sweeney, Enforcing/Protection: The Danger of Chevron in Refugee Act Cases, 71 Admin. L. Rev. 127, 174 (2019).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Air France v. Saks, 470 U.S. 392, 405 (1985) (citing Benjamins v. … As the foregoing qualified commentators have shown, member nations have not diminished the author’s exclusive right of public performance to the drastic extent of the court below.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2019

Dream Act Coal. v. … MSHA stated that the withdrawal was based, in part, on a decision by the Eleventh Circuit to invalidate a similar, earlier air quality rule. Id. at 42.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stuart R. Harrow, Petitioner v. Department of Defense

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2024

Henderson surveyed these and other features of the veterans claims system, and concluded that “[r]igid jurisdictional treatment of the 120-day period for filing a notice of appeal in the Veterans Court … See BIO 10 (“[T]he time bar is jurisdictional because it is linked to Section 1295(a)(9)’s grant of jurisdiction by an express cross-reference” (cleaned up)); Fed. Educ. Ass’n—Stateside Region v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky Assn. of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) ... 20 Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp. v. Ilsley, 690 F.2d 323 SE MED dndacecdcbeedesndsvceesesede 20 Stuart Circle Hosp. Corp. v. … As amici hereafter demonstrate, AWP statutes impair the capacity of MCOs to: (a) control the quality of the providers they allow in their networks; and (b) periodically evaluate the quality and efficiency

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al., Petitioners v. Maria Angelica Guzman Chavez, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 12, 2020

Court review of detention must also be provided periodically or regularly. See HRC General Comment No. 35, ¶ 18 (detention “must be subject to periodic reevaluation and judicial review”). … Australia, ¶ 9.4; accord HRC General Comment No. 35, ¶ 12 (“[D]etention is arbitrary if it is not subject to periodic re-evaluation of the justification for continuing the detention.”); Rapporteur’s 2012

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rory Douglas Wilson, Petitioner v. Idaho

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025

See Public Act, 3 Charles I, c.1 (1628). But not speech. … At best, it impresses him into a kind of ventriloquism act before he has time to think.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Permanent Mission of India v. City of NY

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

And as respondent convincingly shows, tax liens are widely recognized by courts, legislatures, and commentators as rights in real prop- erty. … Convention wanted to avoid comment on tax suits because they did not intend the Convention to address state-to-state relations at all.

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Healthcare Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Hospital Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1968) .......... 17 Texas Pharmacy Ass’n v. Prudential Ins. Co., 105 F.3d 1035 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. Cases—Continued: Tolton v. … This Court has previously granted certiorari to review an ERISA preemption case in a similar posture without commenting on any jurisdictional issue. See Ingersoll-Rand Co. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food Marketing Institute, Petitioner v. Argus Leader Media, dba Argus Leader

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 25, 2019

Dep’t of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 360 (1976) (citing S. Rep. No. 813, at 3 (1965)). … Titling the report “FOIA is Broken,” then-Chairman Chaffetz called for structural reform to enable FOIA to facilitate government transparency, as intended, noting a comment from a 26-year-old freelance

Amicus Curiae Brief — CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited, et al., Petitioners v. Antrix Corp. Ltd., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 11, 2024

Comment. 309 (2015)..... 18 Robert H. Jackson, Full Faith and Credit: The Lawyer’s Clause of the Constitution, 45 Colum. L. … I, § 10 (listing specific acts prohibited to the States).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Ed. of Westside Community Schools (Dist. 66) v. Mergens

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

a secondary school, the observation made by the Court in that case is equally applicable here: [Bly creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired … Generally, people do not attribute reader opinions on the editorial page in the newspaper, or listener comments on the airwaves, or those made before governmental bodies, to the respective organizations

Amicus Curiae Brief — Moseley v. v. Secret Catalogue, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Petitioners (and some commentators) have suggested that, unless proof of actual economic harm is read into the FTDA, it would create a “right in gross” or lead to some kind of “patent on words,” unlimited … Schroeder Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Mars Incorporated Jonathan P. Meyer Motorola, Inc. Mark T. Starr Unisys Corp. Brian W. Stegman BASF Corp. Graham &.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mobil Oil Corp. v. Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of Florida

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

* The 40-year period is most common and is the one used for illustrative purposes throughout this article. |Florida has a 30-year period, Fla. Stat. … Plaintiff in that case claimed an easement of light and air over a public street under an 1827 deed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Empire Health Foundation, for Valley Hospital Medical Center

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2021

Moreover, mere days before the termination of the FFY 2005 IPPS rulemaking comment period, the Secretary admitted in a web-posting that he had “misstate[d]” his current policy in the FFY 2004 IPPS proposed … agency take “additional comments pertaining to this issue” into consideration when submitting comments to the FFY 2005 proposed rule, for which the comment period would close just a few days after CMS

Amicus Curiae Brief — John Sturgeon, Petitioner v. Bert Frost, in His Official Capacity as Alaska Regional Director of the National Park Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 9, 2018

As the Ninth Circuit recognized, under the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1356b, and the Alaska Statehood Act, Pub. L. … This Court even recently applied the clear statement doctrine and declined to adopt an administrative interpretation of the Clean Water Act where it “would result in a significant impingement of the States