Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mount Lemmon Fire Dist. v. Guido, 138 S. Ct. 1165 (2018) (No. 17-587)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Atonio, Ss inincisderdahncsieestekisiisiapiintinintipiais 26 ix Western Air Lines, Inc. v. … Thurston, 469 U.S. at 121; Reeves, 530 U.S. at 140-41; see also Western Air Lines, Inc. v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 15, 2022
And during this period, states enacted detailed regulations governing local sales of food, regardless of whether the food was imported or locally produced. … They breathe over and over again the same air, tainted with the exhalations of their own fevered bodies, and of the unutterable slimy filth voided from their diseased and ulcerated intestines.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 23, 2021
Ct. 1804, 1813 (2019) (cleaned up). II. THE PLAIN TEXT READING IS CONSISTENT WITH FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES. … longer tolling periods.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alabama Department of Revenue, et al., Petitioners v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2019
Congress enacted the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act), Pub. L. … During the 2007-2016 period relevant to this case, rail carriers paid on average about 9.85¢/gallon of (dyed) diesel for Alabama’s four-percent sale and use tax, which was significantly less than the 19¢
Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 PTE insictesiisulitiiniasidieeiihiiiininiatieriimeas tei elec ae Nd i 16 Society of Sisters v. Pierce, 296 F. 928 (D. Or. … And that was particularly true in the long period before this Court’s decision in Monroe v.
562 U.S. 1177Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Fanfan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
It must also review and revise the Guidelines in consideration of comments and data coming to its attention. … These amendments automatically take effect within a 180-day waiting period, unless otherwise modified or disapproved by Act of Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 994(p).’
542 U.S. 955Amicus Curiae Brief — General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400 U.S. 120 (2000) (1985) 9 11 Garrett v. … Western Air — | Inc. v. Criswell, 472 U.S. 400, 412, 414-417 (1985).
540 U.S. 581Amicus Curiae Brief — Winston Tyler Hencely, Petitioner v. Fluor Corporation, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 28, 2025
Midwest Air Traffic Control Serv., Inc., 8 F.4th 105 (2d Cir. 2021) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Baragona v. … Id. at 424–25. 15 Since the 1980s, Congress has periodically amended the False Claims Act, sometimes “increas[ing] the Act’s civil penalties,” Universal Health Servs., Inc. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Landgraf v. USI Film Products
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Goldberg, Comment, Jmplying Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Cases, 9 Harv. Civ. R.-Civ. Lib. L. Rev. 325, 330-34 (1974). Since the 1991 Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. … line of my air compressor; A semen-like substance was left on the chair at my workbench.
511 U.S. 244Amicus Curiae Brief — Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Goldberg, Comment, Jmplying Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Cases, 9 Harv. Civ. R.-Civ. Lib. L. Rev. 325, 330-34 (1974). Since the 1991 Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. … line of my air compressor; A semen-like substance was left on the chair at my workbench.
511 U.S. 298Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2022
evidence from social science shows that it would be premature for the Court to forbid the kind of race-conscious holistic admissions policy UNC applies. 3 For example, the Court deemed Voting Rights Act … App. 22 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Mottaz
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Rey. 1177, 1185 (1950) (“There comes a time when one ought to be secure in his reasonable expectations that the slate has been wiped clean of ancient obligations.”). 7 Ewert v. … Act), now codified at 25 U.S.C. § 331 et seq. (1982) (allotments to individual Indians authorized with trust period preventing alienaticn); the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, now codified at 25
476 U.S. 834Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025
During this period, the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1870 remained in effect and continued to make Asian immigrants ineligible for citizenship. See supra § II(A). … Id. at 665 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 29, 2025
During this period, the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1870 remained in effect and continued to make Asian immigrants ineligible for citizenship. See supra § II(A). … Id. at 665 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Virginia v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Counsel for Virginia was afforded the courtesy of previewing and commenting on the drafts of the brief prior to filing. 2 While this action was pending, the State of Maryland granted permission for … The Loudoun Authority, in turn, is speaking only because the parties have consented, and the rules of this Court therefore permit its views to be aired.
540 U.S. 56Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 9, 2022
Duke Cunningham) (referring to ACT UP protest); 140 Cong. Rec. 5412 (1994) (statement of Rep. Bob Dornan) (likewise referencing the ACT UP protest). … (cleaned up)); id. at 9a (tables arranged by Spiritual Center leadership).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jesus C. Hernández, et al., Petitioners v. Jesus Mesa, Jr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 9, 2019
Comm., General Comment No. 31, 1DWXUH RI WKH *HQHUDO /HJDO 2EOLJDWLRQ ,PSRVHG RQ 6WDWHV 3DUWLHV WR WKH &RYHQDQW, U.N. Doc. … Comm., General Comment No. 31, 1DWXUH RI WKH *HQHUDO /HJDO 2EOLJDWLRQ ,PSRVHG RQ 6WDWHV 3DUWLHV WR WKH &RYHQDQW, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/ Add.13, ¶ 10 (May 26, 2004).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Black & Decker Disability Plan v. Nord
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) 9 Stephens v. Heckler, 766 F.2d 284 (7th Cir. 1985) ........... 20 Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Ry., 321 U.S. 29 (1944) 13 Tremain v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983). ERISA also requires certain plan procedures for the internal resolution of claims.
538 U.S. 822Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
No one would suppose that the public right to bring a citizen suit for Clean Water Act violations could be sold by one environmental group to another. 15 Patentees can suc private parties who infringe … This Court has already rejected the notion of an infinite reconsideration period in the land-patent context, and with good reason.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Comm.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
acts of censorship. … argue, as it has, that because this is not a prior restraint (or an overbroad statute, or an attempt to seize protected material, etc.), the targeted aliens have no right to a prompt judicial forum to air
525 U.S. 471
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.