Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.10s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 24, 2021
According to one commentator, the legislation’s goal was increased accountability for veterans’ claims. James D. … (cleaned up) (quoting Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 280, 294 (2008)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
It defies logic to suggest that the government should act in a less neutral or more discriminatory manner toward impressionable children. Impressionability works both ways. … Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 272 n.10 (1981) (noting that “by creating a forum the University does not thereby endorse or promote any of the particular ideas aired there”).
533 U.S. 98Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 18, 2023
Act. … Ct. 2044, 2055 n.5 (2018) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — CIC Services, LLC, Petitioner v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2020
(c) Third, the agency “must consider and respond to significant comments received during the period for public comment.” See Perez, at 1203. … Members of the captive industry submitted substantial comments on the PATH Act and Notice 2016-66, both before and after the issuance of Notice 2016-66.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. PACIFIC GAS
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 419 (1992) (“When Congress amends the bankruptcy laws, it does not write on a clean slate [and] this Court has been reluctant to accept arguments that would interpret the Code . … 13, under which unsecured creditors are likely to receive periodic distributions under confirmed plans.
549 U.S. 443Amicus Curiae Brief — Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al., Petitioners v. Google LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2022
INTRODUCTION “Although the United States has protected kids by establishing strict rules and standards on everything from dirty air and unsafe foods to dangerous toys and violence on television, the internet … /. 4 ● the terms the individual typed into in the search tool; ● the videos the individual watched and how often; ● the videos the individual “liked;” ● the videos where the individual posted a comment
Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
'8 Petitioner specifically relies on a comment made in Harris that a union's position on spending may have a “massive” effect on government spending. Pet. Br. 14. … (Keefe 2015, at 11). 37 Similarly, while Petitioner fixates on a union’s role in negotiating wage increases, that task occurs only periodically upon the expiration of a prior agreement.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Ct. 2396 (1994), Conrail, like other United States railroads, had been subject to a prolifera- tion of claims for negligent infliction of emotional dis- tress under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act … Pearson, Liability to Bystanders for Negligently Inflicted Emotional Harm — A Comment on the Nature of Arbitrary Rules, 34 U. Fra. L. Rev. 477, 489 (1982)).
521 U.S. 424Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Fanfan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
It must also review and revise the Guidelines in consideration of comments and data coming to its attention. … These amendments automatically take effect within a 180-day waiting period, unless otherwise modified or disapproved by Act of Congress. See 28 U.S.C. § 994(p).’
542 U.S. 955Amicus Curiae Brief — O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
Ist Sess., p. 1. 13 United Air Lines Inc. v. McMann, 434 U.S. 192, 210-211 (1977). See also EEOC v. Wyoming, 460 U.S. 226, 231 n.3 (1983). … On the other hand, the burden which shifts to an em- ployer after a plaintiff makes a prima facie case is signifi- cant, weighty and costly, and should be imposed on the '6 Senator Javits commented
517 U.S. 308Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Providers incur significant costs during this period cooperating with DOJ investigations. … That is unreasonable; it is it is the responsi- bility of agencies to produce a coherent, transparent set of expectations and obligations after notice to and comment from providers.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Buffelen Wood Woodworking Co. v. Washington Department of Revenue (No. 99-38)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
State Dep’t of Reve- nue, 488 U.S. 232 (1987) . 4 3,5 STATUTES AND UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONS Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1841 ..000 U.S. Const. amend. … Some taxpayers, after years of ultimately successful litigation challenging a tax have taken to cynically waving a dollar bill in the air and commenting that they have not received even one dollar in
Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 891 (2016) (No. 15-474)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
adopted verbatim by the district judge and affirmed by the Fourth Circuit: any type of action can be part of “a series of steps to exercise influence,” App.275a., including simply posing for photos or “comments … The Fourth Circuit’s decision is a cautionary tale in trying to suffocate the “air” of liberty to extinguish the “fire” of factional advocacy. Cf.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
This Court held in Petrella that a copyright owner can only recover damages for the three-year period leading up to suit. … When an infringing advertisement will air in two days or an infringing artwork will be shipped out of the country in four days, even special handling would not allow for a registration decision in
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 12, 2025
This period saw the rise of Blaine Amendments. See Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793, 828–29 (2000). … Glenn, American Indian/First Nations Schooling: From the Colonial Period to the Present 52 (2011).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United Health Group, Inc., Fka United Healthcare Corp. v. Klay
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Korean Air Lines, Ltd., 490 U.S. 122 (1989) (denial of motion for partial summary judgment); Catalano, Inc. v. … Target Sales, Inc., 446 U.S. 643 (1980) (denial of motion to declare an agreement to fix credit terms illegal per se under the Sherman Act).
543 U.S. 1081Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2022
evidence from social science shows that it would be premature for the Court to forbid the kind of race-conscious holistic admissions policy UNC applies. 3 For example, the Court deemed Voting Rights Act … App. 22 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lewis v. Brunswick Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) .... 14 Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 (1984) ... 9 United States v. … Thus, there was no attempt to conform to the notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. § 553 (1994).
523 U.S. 1113Amicus Curiae Brief — Evergreen Freedom Foundation, dba Freedom Foundation, Petitioner v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 13, 2019
R.P.C. 1.2(b), Comment 5 ............................... 13 Wash. … The mere act of putting a measure on a local ballot is not subject to campaign finance law.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 890 (2016) (No. 15-375)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
in favor of awarding fees in the absence of more explicit statutory language and legislative comment). … Automotive Maintenance Machine Co., 324 U.S. 806, 814 (1945) (“he who comes into equity must come with clean hands”).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.