Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.26s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Edwards, 482 So. 2d 1176 (Ala. 1985), overruled on other grounds, 554 So.2d Se Gi ED Wc bch 6snn bb ude ecb thasowecconcude 25 Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1 (1824)........ 19 Gills v. … Edwards, 482 So. 2d 1176, 1198 (Ala. 1985), over- ruled on other grounds, 554 So.2d 927 (Ala. 1989); Volks- wagen of America, Inc. v. Young, 321 A.2d 737, 746 (Md. 1974); H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v.
529 U.S. 861Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
FILED AUG 26 2016 OFFICE OF THE CLERK No. 15-423 eee In the Supreme Court of the United States BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, ET AL.. PETITIONERS v. … Supp. 2016) .............-0-eceserereevens 14 In the Supreme Court of the Anited States No. 15-423 BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Patterson v. Shumate
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 Tatge v. Cheaver (In re Cheaver), 121 B.R. 665, outed sean eee erguaeeeaeeraeee = (Bankr. P. D. C. 1990) 20 General Motors Corp. v. Buha, 623 F.2d 455 (6th Taylor v. … Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 (1987). An interpretation of one federal statute that so under- cuts another is to be avoided, unless that is the clear intent of Congress.
504 U.S. 753Amicus Curiae Brief — Monge v. California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Woodman, 218 U.S. 205, 212 (1910). … S. 472, 477-482 (1995) (reviewing cases).
524 U.S. 721Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Lasker, 441 U.S. 471, 478 (1979); Cort v. Ash, 422 U.S. 66, 84 (1975); Ashley v. Ryan, 153 U.S. 436, 446 (1894). … Chris-Craft In- dustries, Inc., 480 U.S. 1 (1977); AMCA International Corp. 3217 C.F.R. 240.14e-1 (1986). v. Krause, 482 F. Supp. 929, 937 (S.D. Ohio 1979).
479 U.S. 810Amicus Curiae Brief — Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Fase ee > 37 79th Congress, S. 541, H.R. 674, H.R. 3383. . . . . 37 We Sa a. ee tt 37 8st Congress, S. 423, S. 445,8. 2435. . . . 2... 37 1944-1950 NARUC Annual Convention Proceedings . . 37 TINA … o78th Congress, S. 246, H.R. 1012, H.R. 3420, H.R. 4845, H.R. 4848; 79th Congress, S. 541, H.R. 674, H.R. 3383; 80th Congress, H.R. 2337; 8ist Congress, S. 423, S. 445, S. 2435.
410 U.S. 943Amicus Curiae Brief — Lawrence v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (1996)............cc.cceeeeeeeeeeees 3 Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).......cc.ccccscecsesseeeeneeeeenenes 7 U.S. v. … Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978); Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987).
539 U.S. 558Amicus Curiae Brief — Asarco Inc. v. Kadish
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Cox, 420 U.S. at 482-483. … Allen, 468 U.S. piven ~ ve n.21; Valley Forge, 454 U.S. at 482, 489-490 n.20. c 0 3 the individual taxpayers lack standing to invoke the jurl icle III court. . 2 a Arizona has liberal standing rules
490 U.S. 605Amicus Curiae Brief — Wright v. West
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
United States, 162 U.S. 613, 40 L. … S., at 481-482, the Powell Court de- cided to allocate the exclusionary rule decision to the state courts as opposed to the federal habeas courts.
505 U.S. 277Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) ..........-scccssssescseseeceeeees 25 United States v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 95-96 (1987); see Loving, 388 U.S. at 12; see also Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 578 (recognizing the liberty interests of “married persons” in the privacy of their sexual conduct “even
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 21, 2021
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), and on Founding-era legal treatises and nineteenth-century judicial interpretations of the right to bear arms. … POL’Y 385, 414, 423, 426 (2012) (explaining that, linguistically, the prefatory clause or “absolute provides the basis for the guarantee of the main clause”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) ....... 17 United States v. Yankowski, 184 F.3d 1071 a ae ee eee 19 Vil Cases—Continued: Page Whitman v. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 497 (1997) (Reviser’s Notes may 18 not “muddy the ostensibly unambiguous provision of the stat- ute as enacted by Congress”).
545 U.S. 1151Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 3, 2025
Garland, 86 F.4th 482 (1st Cir. 2023) ................................. 18 Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Mgmt. … Garland, 86 F.4th 482, 490 (1st Cir. 2023); Erraez-Montano v. Bondi, 2025 WL 600974, at *1 (2d Cir. Feb. 25, 2025); Avila v. Att’y Gen., 82 F.4th 250, 257 (3d Cir. 2023); Guardado v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — KSR Intern. Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
“ Cf Barton, Non-Obviousness, supra, at 482-83 (“The MPEP’s demand that there be suggestions in the prior art as a pre-requisite to (Continued on following page) 24 and failed adequately to explain … examination, data on patent quality, the need for more resources, and recommending post-grant oppositions to address the numerous invalid patents that predictably issue); Barton, Non- Obviousness, supra, at 482
550 U.S. 398Amicus Curiae Brief — DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Hardesty, 467 U.S. 638, 645-46 (1984); Boston Stock Evehange, 429 U.S. at 336-37)). … Scheiner, 482 US. 266, 284 (1987) (quoting Armco, Inc. v. Hardesty, 467 U.S. 638, 644 (1984)). Virtually every state employs tax incentives for promoting cconomic development.
546 U.S. 1163Amicus Curiae Brief — Martin v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Texas, 441 U.S. LG, 423 (A979) coceosecseces Adkins v. Bordenkircher, 674 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1982) Allen v. United States, Te FS 8£)) ns Barnes v. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423 (1979).
480 U.S. 228Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzalez v. Crosby
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
S. 482, 44 L. Ed. 2d 317, Se eh SED ors 660d sccavetersdseducdbawe< 7 Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211, 131 L. Ed. 2d 328, 115 S. … Davis, 421 U.S. 482 (1975) (per curiam). A habeas petitioner successfully obtained a new trial, but then sought to preclude a retrial.
545 U.S. 524Amicus Curiae Brief — Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973) ............... 5, 11, 27 PAGE Dunham v. Wright, 423 F.2d 940 (3d Cir. 1970) ....... 12 Eubanks v. Collins, C-82-0360-L (A) (W.D. Ky. … U.S.
476 U.S. 747Amicus Curiae Brief — PHH Mortgage Corporation, Petitioner v. Mark Anthony Guthrie
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 21, 2024
U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 4. … (quoting Pertuso, 233 F.3d at 423).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 22, 2024
Corp., 277 F.3d 415, 423 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting Holmes v. Securities Investor Prot. Corp., 503 U.S. 258, 268-69 (1992)). … SOFEC, Inc., 517 U.S. 830, 838 (1996).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.