Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.18s
Opposition Brief — Central Newspapers, Inc. v. Johnson
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
Marino, 484 U.S. at 304. … . at 482-3 (emphasis added).
528 U.S. 963Opposition Brief — Sklaroff v. Pennsylvania ex rel. Fisher
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
/d., 324 U.S. at 125-126. … Id., 454 U.S. at 482 (quoting Fairchild v. Hughes, 258 U.S. 126, 129 (1922)). It is plain from the record before this Court that Sklaroff has no standing to prosecute his petition.
531 U.S. 917Opposition Brief — Christensen v. Griffes
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
More recently, the U.S. … Lorenz, 19 Ill. 2d 415, 422-423, 167 N.E. 2d 236, 12 240-241 (1960). Therefore, prior federal equity practice is a two-sided sword. 450 U.S. at 524 n. 31. Ill.
520 U.S. 1264Opposition Brief — J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B. (No. 92-1239)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
U.S., 493 U.S. 1069, 107 L.Ed.2d 1017, 110 S.Ct. 1109 SIT i eotesicteeeettneaenatnademinadldeeneaadeheaeeaneamabiatiedia asian 12 U.S. v. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 97 S.Ct. 1272, 51 L.Ed.2d 498, cited in Batson, ___ U.S. at __, 106 S.Ct. at 1723.
Opposition Brief — Collins v. Mac-Millan Bloedel, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 OED 66 Chad veka eee en ae 19 B.M.W. of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S. 559 eee rere re rer ere ay rere 20 City of Newport v. … Thompson, 56 F.3d 476, 482 (3d Cir. 1995); Lu- sardi v. Lechner, 855 F.2d 1062, 1070 (3d Cir. 1998).
532 U.S. 1066Opposition Brief — Bosack v. Soward
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
Co., 526 U.S. … Scis., 489 U.S.
559 U.S. 938Opposition Brief — Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), and hold that damages are unrecoverable for a taking. Rather, the court held that no taking had occurred. Pet. … See Yee, 505 U.S. at 532-37; Pennell, 485 U.S. at 8-14. B.
522 U.S. 1077Opposition Brief — Phelps Dodge Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
See 522 U.S. at 77, 82. … litigation on the relevant cause of action rather than merely controlling the nature and character of, or determining the admissibility of evidence in, the state proceedings still to come,” id. at 482
533 U.S. 941Opposition Brief — George v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Wood, 309 U.S. 344 (1940)................ 9 Howard v. Kentucky, 200 U.S. 164 (1906) .............. 7 Northern P. R. Co. v. Herbert, 116 U.S. 642 (1886) ..... 7 Price Waterhouse v. … App., Vol. 7, 482).
513 U.S. 1043Opposition Brief — Payne v. Churchich
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
McDuffie, 155 F.3d 479, 482-83 (4th Cir. 1998), cert denied, 119 S.Ct. 1121 (1999). However, the divergence on this issue has absolutely no bearing on the present case. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997); City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385 (1989).
527 U.S. 1004Opposition Brief — Ojavan Investors, Inc. v. California Coastal Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
(Id. at 423.) … Sauvinet, 92 U.S. 90, 92-93 (1875).)
522 U.S. 1015Opposition Brief — Apotex Corp. v. Astrazeneca AB (No. 08-867)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Co., 129 U.S. 530, 537 (1889). … Peters, 129 U.S. at 537.
Opposition Brief — Contel Cellular Inc. v. Leaf River Valley Cellular Telephone Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
City of San Diego, 450 U.S. 621, 632-33 (1981); O'Dell v. Espinoza, 456 U.S. 430 (1982). … Id. at 482-3. To define this narrow category, the Court cited Construction Laborers v.
516 U.S. 1145Opposition Brief — Bugryn v. City of Bristol
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
Boston & Maine Corp., 503 U.S. at 422-423 (applying Midkiff deferential standard to a challenge to a condemnation by Interstate Commerce Commission for benefit of Amtrak pursuant to eminent domain … United States, 506 U.S. 9, 12 (1992); Calderon v. Moore, 518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996).
534 U.S. 1019Opposition Brief — White v. Lachance
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Buie, 494 U.S. 825 (1990) NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975) oo... Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996) Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) ......e.cccscee0e-. … Random House College Diction- ary 482-83 (Revised ed.1975).
528 U.S. 1153Opposition Brief — Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Department
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
Western Well Works, Inc., 261 U.S. 387, 393, 43 S. Ct. 1] 422, 423, 67 L. Ed. 712 (1923). … Arline, 480 U.S. 273, 107 S. Ct. 1123, 94 L.
526 U.S. 1018Opposition Brief — Gerald Delane Murray, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 23, 2019
Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1, 7-8, 10 (1989) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551 (1987)). Additionally, there is no federal constitutional right of self-representation on appeal. Martinez v. … Collins, 506 U.S. 390, 423 (1993) (O’Connor, J., concurring) (commenting on an “11th hour” affidavit alleging an alternate perpetrator “with no reasonable explanation for the nearly decade-long delay”
Opposition Brief — Ardoin v. Seacor Marine, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
Western Well Works, Inc., 261 U.S. 387, 393, 67 L.Ed. 712, 714, 43 S.Ct. 422, 423 (1923). … Rogers, supra, 352 U.S. at 538, 1 L.Ed.2d at 527.
510 U.S. 1165Opposition Brief — Weigner v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
Ruby, 312 Md. 413, 540 A.2d 482, (1988) (service by first-class mail adequate to apprise former husband of 25 ex-wife's proceedings seeking earnings lien for enforcement of child support). … Mullane, supra, 339 U.S. at 319, quoting Blinn v. Nelson, 222 U.S. 1, 7 (1911).
488 U.S. 1005Opposition Brief — Republic Insurance Group v. Maleski
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Carpenter, 305 U.S. 297 (1938), reh’g denied, 305 U.S. 675 (1939). … Assoc., 426 U.S. 482, 488 (1976); Ridgway v. Ridgway, 454 U.S. 46, 54 (1981).
506 U.S. 1087
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.