Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

2.42s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    During the same period, seven Assembly Democrats mailed out 208,000 pieces, including those sent out by Murray. … “One undercover project doesn’t eradicate a type of crime, but it acts as a deterrent.”

    528 U.S. 377
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Board of Education

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1954

    The Southern mother doesn’t see a vision of a clean scrubbed little Negro child about to embark on a great adventure. … Is there anything I haven’t touched on in my questions which you would like to comment on? Personnel Interviewed A.

    347 U.S. 483
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Epic Systems Corporation, Petitioner v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 15, 2022

    Haslip, 499 U.S. 1 (1991) ....................................................... 2, 13, 20 Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. … Corp., 509 U.S. 443, 454 (1993) (plurality opinion) (quoting Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Seegers, 207 U.S. 73, 78 (1907)).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    The waters in Lake Tahoe continue to be extraordinarily clean, clear and pristine -- cleaner and safer than almost all domestic drinking water anywhere in the country. … Suitum did “appeal” the correctness of TRPA’s SEZ designation of her lot, that appears to have been both an unnecessary and futile act.

    520 U.S. 725
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Hospital Assn. v. NLRB

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

    Member facilities range in size from the 15-bed 379th Strategic Hospital at the Wurtsmith Air Force Base to the 960-bed Henry Ford Hospital in downtown Detroit. … The quoted comment concerning the Act's “in each case” requirement does not appear in Davis’ subsequent treatises, which more broadly discuss the Board’s rulemaking power.

    499 U.S. 606
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Knights

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

    While the airline searches have helped to ensure that there have been comparatively few incidents of air piracy, see Von Raab, 489 U. … It is an “act of grace” from the state to the probationer. See Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U. S. 490, 492 (1935); People v. Rodri- guez, 51 Cal. 3d 437, 445, 975 P. 2d 783, 788 (1990).

    534 U.S. 112
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwest Airlines Co., Petitioner v. Latrice Saxon

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022

    in 1936 to include air carriers and [certain of] their employees.” … What of other workers at the airport generally—such as caterers delivering meals to airplanes, shuttle-bus drivers, cleaning staff, or restaurant and kiosk staff?

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, dba Labcorp, Petitioner v. Luke Davis, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2025

    (cleaned up). … To begin with, many consumer protection statutes, such as the Truth in Lending Act and the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, cap statutory damages for this very purpose.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Camreta v. Greene

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

    In Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357 (2004), the New York State Court of 1s protective authorities pray for special treatment under the Fourth Amendment, they do not do so with clean hands. … F.S.’s father informed the police that these types of comments and accusations had “come in several ways” from Nimrod and Sarah.

    563 U.S. 692
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Christopher N. Payne, Petitioner v. Jahal Taslimi, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2021

    The CDC uses the word effectively to reflect the fact that while “non-zero risk[s]” can never be ruled out, evidence suggests that it is not possible to transmit HIV during periods of non-detection or … from a person with detectable levels of the virus in their system; these fluids include blood, semen and pre-seminal fluid, rectal fluid, vaginal fluid, and breast milk.25 HIV cannot be transmitted by air

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives v. Flores (Nos. 08-294, 08-289)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    ALEC supports the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). … Because such decrees often remain in _ place for extended periods of time, the likelihood of significant changes occurring during the life of the decree is increased.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2024

    Yar at 192 16 (cleaned up). … This problem is compounded for interactive websites where users can post comments or communicate directly with other users.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chevron USA Incorporated, et al., Petitioners v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2025

    Military contracting is extensive, with the Navy, Air Force and Army regularly spending more on contracts than any other federal agency. … Petitioners face liability for actions after the State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978 took effect in 1980—decades after World War II—including their failure to clean 31 and restore

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 I ies tiki ili hihi niiticiiaenaahesisliasbtlahidinibdindnan 15 United Air Lines, Inc. v. … United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann, 434 US. 192, 207 (1977) (White, J., concurring in the judg- ment).

    554 U.S. 135
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio, Petitioner v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2022

    Neither the Termination Act Nor the Safety Act Preempts Anti-Blocking Statutes Congress enacted two statutes that frame the antiblocking discussion: (1) Federal Railroad Safety Act (Safety Act), Pub. … Serv., Locomotive Idling, Air Quality, and Blocked Crossings 2 (March 4, 2022), https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF1 0978.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Seiber v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Haw. 1986), ee ge aire, ae a errr 8 Karam v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 705 A.2d 1221 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. … The Court reached this conclusion even though that property would have been periodically occupied not by the government, but by random members of the beachgoing public: In Loretto we observed that

    543 U.S. 873
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner v. Jennifer Zuch

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 24, 2025

    Pension Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-280, § 855, 120 Stat. 781, 1019 (2006). … (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Constr. Trades Council

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

    tat eceurh ahs sha eee ae ae cee fe 15, 20 Hospital and Service Employees Union, Local 399 (Delta Air Lines), 263 NLRB 996 (1982)...... 15, 16 Internatienal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. … Rev. 1071 (1987).... 27 Comment, The Common-law and Constitutional Status of Antidiscrimination Boycotts, 66 Yale L.J.

    485 U.S. 568
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Frank v. Gaos, 138 S. Ct. 1697 (2018) (No. 17-961)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Volkswagen, AG (In re Volkswagen Clean Diesel Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.), 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 18562 (9th Cir. … The Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) was passed in 1986 as Title LI of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. 18 U.S.C.A. §2701-2713 (West).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kendrick Jarrell Beaird, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 7, 2026

    See Dupree, 57 F.4th at 1280 (Pryor, C.J., concurring) (“Guidelines commentary ordinarily goes through the same noticeand-comment and congressional review procedures as substantive guideline revisions. … Or, to use the language of Kisor, lenity is one of the “traditional tools of construction” that courts must exhaust before deferring to the commentary. 588 U.S. at 575 (cleaned up).

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.