Documents

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Geophysical Development Corp. v. Coe

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1943

C. 399.......... ll Radtke Patents Corporation v. Coe, 122 F. (2d) 937, OR A eS a Cee pene erence 16 Roller v. Goodwin, 282 O. G. 387, 1921 C.D.11........ 19 Union Switch & Signal Co. v. … It was stated in the motion to take testimony (R. 23-24) and the statement was verified by the affidavit of petitioner Krasnow (R. 28-29), that the testimony pro- posed to be taken was to the effect

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Baker v. Hunter

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1944

(February 24, 1933, Ch. 119, Secs. 1 to 3, 47 Stat. RE 6 904; March 8, 1934, Ch. 49. 48 Stat. 399; June 7, 1934, Ch. 426, 48 Stat. 926). … Commitment overruled January 8, 1944; Petiticn for Rehearing Denied January 23, 1944; Opinion not yet Published, but review in this court is intended. 8 February, 1943; that Appellant, on January 24

Petition for Rehearing — In Re Sefe A. Almedom, Petitioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · Apr 26, 2025

Ohio, 488 17.8. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 LEd2d 973 (is b78)}." ‘481 US., at 399, 107 S.Ct, at 182/ m these cases itis clear that 4 lt vote ra. gg re ‘e : ‘ne reasons underlying this firmly es dilished … Zi6, 7 L.a.24 66 (us soort, bald ¢ SS OrICALy that nants ath susbencan ace Gieel abawION rate ezminain forehadove 2a. On, Suupra.

Amicus Brief for the United States — Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief for the United States · 1984

See also J.A. 24, 26, 29, 39; IT R. 37-38, 40-41, 44, 58. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968).

Brief — United States v. Midwest Video Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Brief · 1972

Federal omuunisations Commission, 399 F. 2465 (8th Cir. 1968) ........ 26 . Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. Co. v. Morris- . town, 276 U.S. 182 (1928) ..2..........0.... eel on . … «eral Communications Commission, 399 F. 2d 65 (1968) “sustained Commission jurisdiction when the regulation - of CATV was reasonably ancillary to broadcast object- tives.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bryant v. Waltham School Committee

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999

Care and Protection of Charles, 399 Mass. 324, 334 (1987). … 24 (a) or 24 (b) or 24 (c)." part | section 6.

Petitioners Brief — Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2003

Record, N.T. 5/10/91, at 62-64; J.A. at 21-24. … Record, N.T. 5/10/91, at 64; J.A. at 23-24.

Appendix — Martin County, Florida v. Robert Makemson and Robert G. Udell Okeechobee County, Florida v. Robert Lee Dennis

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987

See State u Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441. App. 25 — Id. at 340. … Oakley, 159 W.Va. 805, 227 S.E.2d 314 (1976); and State u Rush, 46 N.J. 399, 217 A.2d 441 (1966).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City and County of San Francisco v. Rodis (No. 07-1376)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

Bates 352 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1965) (per curiam), and United States v. Ford, 461 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1972) (per curiam). … United States, 352 F.2d 399, 399-400 (9th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (discussing identification of suspect).

Opposition Brief — Buonora v. Coggins

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011

Compl. 4] 23-24. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (internal quotations omitted).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stacey Mooney, Petitioner v. Illinois Education Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 10, 2020

Feb. 24, 2020) ..........................5, 22 Littler v. Ohio Association of Public School Employees, No. 2:18-cv-01745-GCS-CMV (S.D. … Feb. 24, 2020), petition for rehearing en banc pending. 11. See Danielson v.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — California v. Foreman

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Louisiana (1970) 399 U.S. 30, 33 [26 L.Ed.2d 409, 413, 90 S.Ct. 1969). LE The People rely upon language in People v. … Maroney (1959) 399 U.S. 42 [26 L.Ed.2d 419, 90 S.Ct. 1975]; or involve the hot pursuit of a fleeing felon as in Warden v.

Opposition Brief — O'Brien v. O'Laughlin (No. 09-484)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009

Vol. 9:119). 24. … See Petition, page 24; O'Laughlin II/ at 302.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wyoming v. Houghton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

.-++++55 17 BG RR aan Seer ewok ee eo ew ee 21 Ee POPC OE CELE ETS ae Ree. 24 (iii) iV TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U. S. 753, 61 L. … Maroney, 399 U. S. 42, 44 (1970) (instruments and fruits of armed robbery, namely guns and money).

Brief for the Appellee — Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Beaver County

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Appellee · 1946

S. 399, M0 0, ULS. ex rel.T. V. A. v. Powelson, ‘319 U. … Pelzer, 312 U.S 399, 402-3. ° National ‘Labor Relations Boaz v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adem Albra, Petitioner v. Board of Trustees of Miami Dade College, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2018

Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 626, 67 L.Ed. 1042(1923) .............36 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 426,491; 86 S. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 626, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923).

Motion to affirm — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Evan Milligan, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Oct 20, 2025

Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 433 (2006). The district court’s reasoning is fully consistent with Milligan. C. … Callais, Nos. 24-109 & 24-110 (Sept. 24, 2025) [hereinafter “U.S. Br.”]. The United States’s approach is wrong for three reasons.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Long v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

No. 399, 68 Stat. 250, codified at 25 U.S.C. §§ 891-902 (1953). … No. 399, 68 Stat. 250 (1954)).

Jurisdictional Statement — Roe v. Wade

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1973

at 28a), and on July 24, 1970, by Appellant Jane Roe (App. at 21a). … Supp. 1032 (D.D.C. 1969), ques. of juris. postponed to merits, 397 U.S. 1061, further juris. questions propounded, 399 U.S. 923 (1970) ; California v. Belous, 71 Cal. 24 ——, 458 P.2d 194, 80 Cal.

Jurisdictional Statement — Harris v. Fuerst

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981

OPINION BELOW The opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio, attached hereto, in reported at 64 Ohio St. 2d 128, 413 N.E. 24 826 (1980). … Miller, 61 Ohio St. 24 6, 399 N.E. 2d 66 (1980). THE FEDERAL QUESTION IS SUBSTANTIAL The right to access to the divorce courts has been recognized as fundamental by this Court in Boddie v.