Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.95s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gregory W. Pheasant, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 23, 2026
Congress could even utilize the agencies to collect and summarize comments on proposed laws, like what agencies do now when rulemaking. … Garland, 19 F.4th 890, 923 (6th Cir. 2021) (en banc) (Murphy, J., dissenting) (citations cleaned up). III.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
carriers’ limitations of air routes and divi- sions of territories that were the basis of the antitrust suit, including the power to prohibit unfair methods of competition and to approve those very … The Commission is authorized to suspend the designation of a board of trade as a contract market for a period not exceeding six months for violations of the Act or the rules of the Secretary or failure
409 U.S. 289Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
OL FM AIRE rs OE 4 West River Bridge Co. v. Dix, a ee I iia, sss tsccdtcdansecadseieciibboesassionaiees 6 Yates v. Milwaukee, 77 U.S. … It was in this context that a commentator could confidently assert that “an act which came with- in the scope of tne State police power could not be termed a depriva- tion of property.”23 The Court
505 U.S. 1003Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Do new regulations promulgated by HHS under Title X of the Public Health Service Act which prohibit abortion counseling, referral and advocacy in programs funded under the Act … Comment, The Title X Family Planning Gag Rule: Can the Government Buy Up Constitutional Rights? 41 Stan. L. Rev. 401, 408 (1989) [hereinafter Gag Rule].
500 U.S. 173Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 11, 2018
i.e., a state) function, or being compelled by the state to act. … The panel majority below concluded that Petitioners engaged in “state action” when they suspended Respondents from airing programs on MNN’s public access channels.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Andre Martello Barton, Petitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 3, 2019
And nothing in the history of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) indicates that Congress intended to discount the years … Presidential Statement on Signing the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act 1997, reprinted in 1 Legislative History of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997 P.L. 104-208, at 1937 (1997
Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington v. Glucksberg
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
"Adequate" palliative care may also require extended periods of sedation to the point of permanent or temporary unconsciousness. … Compassion in Dying. 79 F.3d at 835 ("My son-in-law then had the unfortunate and unpleasant task of cleaning my father’s splattered brains off the basement walls.”)
521 U.S. 702Amicus Curiae Brief — Garcetti v. Ceballos
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Dept. of Air Force, 39\ F.3d 1377 (Fed. I ceneees 19 Willis v. Dept. of Agric., 141 F.3d 1139 (Fed. Cir. … of Air Force, 391 F.3d 1377, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2004), 20 the public forum, even given the risks that such disclosure would entail.
547 U.S. 410Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Alvarez-Machain
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
No. 2361, 119 U.N.T.S. 3, as amended by the Pro- tocol of Buenos Aires of February 27, 1967, 21 U.S.T. 607, T.I.A.S. … nor profess to act under the treaty.
504 U.S. 655Amicus Curiae Brief — Camreta v. Greene
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
In Nicholson v Scoppetta, 3 N.Y.3d 357 (2004), the New York State Court of 1s protective authorities pray for special treatment under the Fourth Amendment, they do not do so with clean hands. … F.S.’s father informed the police that these types of comments and accusations had “come in several ways” from Nimrod and Sarah.
563 U.S. 692Amicus Curiae Brief — Hagen v. Utah
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Act of 1902, Act of May 27, 1902, ch. 888, 6 GE 20-23, 35 Indian Appropriations Act of 1905, Act of March 3, 1905, ch. 1479, _ & 5 rr 20-24, 35 xii Indian Reorganization Act, Act of June 18, 1934 … The emphasized comments, which mirror the language of the Anti-injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, suggest that the district court believed that the appropriate authority for compelling the State’s compliance
510 U.S. 399Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Ge Detopetence (IFSG) ..... 6. ccc seen eens Antonio Boggiano, The Experience of Latin American States, in INTERNATIONAL UNIFORM LAW IN PRACTICE /LE DROIT UNIFORM INTERNATIONAL DANS LA PRATIQUE [Acts … (the leading U.S. commentator and a leading Singapore commentator) that domestic labels should not con- trol CISG proceedings, see John O.
539 U.S. 925Amicus Curiae Brief — Fantasy, Inc. v. Marascalco
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
That holding is at odds with the plain meaning of the statute, the legislative history of the 1976 Copyright Act, and the views of the commentators, including, significantly, the Register of Copyrights … With the 1909 Act, Congress extended the period for applying for renewal from six months to one year.
504 U.S. 931Amicus Curiae Brief — Committee to Oppose the Sale of St. Bartholomew's Church, Inc. v. Rector
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Department of General Services essentially confirmed the enormity of those costs, iden- tifying total projected costs of over $6,000,000, which the DGS report concluded could be expended in three phased periods … For example, opposing witnesses simply asserted that the Church could relieve its lack of funds by going out and raising money or selling its air rights.
499 U.S. 905Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 21, 2025
No such act of Congress exists here. … The strict time period for removal (along with the set of congressionally recognized exceptions) is nothing like a limitations period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — John Ream, Petitioner v. Department of the Treasury, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026
Spirits were used as cleaning agents. Id. Candidates handed out liquor to their supporters at the polls. … The surplus product, high tax and decline in demand, “kept the distilling business in a comparatively depressed condition after the speculative period following the war.” Id.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Air, Inc., 157 F.3d 744 (9th Cir. 1998), modified in other respects, 196 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 1999) _. 10 Beaird v. … 26 Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1210] ef seg. .............. 10, 27 Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 et seg. ............... 11, 18 Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
529 U.S. 1002Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 15, 2023
Ct. 2228, 2268 (2022) (cleaned up). … During the same period, chemical abortions “increased from 4.4% of total abortions in 2002 to 34.1% in 2015.” Id.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Schmidt v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
The petitioner was instructed on how to escort prisoners to and from work sites and how to clean and load his rifle. … The Holtzman Amendment was added to the Act in 1978.
502 U.S. 921Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. French
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Congress enacted the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), Pub. L. … Boraxo should be used to clean showers, the court-appointed jail monitor must be given a city car within one grade of the prison commis- sioner’s”’). 4 According to the Wall Street Journal, Prof.
530 U.S. 327
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.