Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bolar Pharmaceutical Co. v. Roche Products, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

They show only the increase during the 10-year period from about 1962 to 1972. … Congress has adopted compulsory licensing only for particular areas such as air pollution technology, 42 U.S.C. § 7404, and atomic energy, 42 U.S.C. § 2183. 15 III.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Paperworkers v. Misco, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

ET Le wien eee Labor Management Relations Act, Section 301, NE I Cee ve a et ee Meat Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. $§ 602 ff —.............. … The general rule is stated by the leading 1363 U.S. at 593. 7 commentators on arbitration practice: “Where a dis- charge occurs, its propriety must be determined from an analysis of the cause for

Amicus Curiae Brief — Daphne Moore, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 13, 2023

Ct. 2206, 2214 (2018) (cleaned up). And so, while ATF agents might not be expected to “shield their eyes when passing by a home on public thoroughfares,” California v. … ] observing it and acting on the knowledge of it.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lawson v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1950

Later in the summer of 1947, the Committee sent certain investigators to Hollywood who urged the pro- ducers to “clean out their houses of certain writers * * * else there would be trouble in the industry … Out of the countless stories contained in the records and proceed- ings before the National Labor Relations Board in the early years of the Wagner Act, of the use of the blacklist to terrorize workers

Amicus Curiae Brief — TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2024

Following additional public comment, the FCC issued final designation orders excluding Huawei and ZTE as permissible suppliers for companies participating in Universal Service Fund programs. … Id. at 641 (cleaned up). And addressing a national security threat in this way is a “legitimate regulation of conduct.” Id. at 636. The same is true here.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

im- poses a clear, mandatory duty upon the Secretary of the Interior with respect to management of federal lands identified as potential wilderness areas: “During the period of review of such areas … See, e.g., Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. CAB, 750 F.2d 81, 87 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sierra Club v. Morton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

In National Automatic Laundry Cleaning Council v. … This concern is reflected in numerous recent Acts relating to air pollution, water poliution, open space, and, most particu- larly, the Nationa! Environmental Policy Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

Nettopne hkduaca air ( diine | ficty Lascentlion Mic uate Vo Sey orn Ison, detlerson LP hens ee Pas || Woashitwton, bh ¢ OE TABLE OF- CONTENTS pies es: Page Moros ror Leave To Eine Brier Amicus … The Association was first or- ganized in 1857%nd was chartered by a special act of Coes in 1906..

Amicus Curiae Brief — Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., 136 S. Ct. 356 (2015) (No. 14-1513)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Cleaning, Inc., 434 F.2d 1212 (5th Cir. 1970) .0........ccecececeeeseeeees 12 Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985)....... 13 Fogerty v. … Cleaning, Inc., 434 F.2d 1212, 1214 (5th Cir. 1970); Am. Safety Table Co. v. Schreiber, 415 F.2d 373, 378 (2d Cir. 1969); see also John J.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

The United States is bound by the Declaration by virtue of its 1968 ratification of the OAS Charter as amended by the 1967 Protocol of Buenos Aires. … There is no evidence that Rothstein committed these acts as part of a scheme to build in constitutional error.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tropp v. Corporation of Lloyd's

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

It was preceded by the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, and the Investment Company Act of … The representations in (i) and (ii) were during the relevant period, untrue. (Paragraphs 375 and 376). vi.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

manager of the City of Niagara Falls, alleging that he had accepted a promise of employment with and other benefits from the company which was then negotiating with the City on a cleanup contract to clean … expect of true racketeers” in contrast to conduct which “show[s] little more than a garden variety misstatement of (footnote continued on next page) 18 on a paraphrase of ‘‘ Justice Stewart’s famous comment

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Austin, Texas, Petitioner v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 29, 2021

Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 (1989) (cleaned up). Speech-limiting laws that do reference speech’s content are “presumptively unconstitutional.” Reed v. … Pol’y 13, 45–48 (2017) (noting claims under the First Amendment and Equal Protection Clause are on “separate but related tracks—with official discrimination acting as the joist connecting the two”; noting

Amicus Curiae Brief — De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

. 1001 et seq.: LI... 3. 18 § 3(37), 29 U.S.C. 10 . 3 § 514(a), 29 U.S.C. 110) 5, 7, 10, 19 Labor Mangement Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. 181 et seq.: I. . 3 L A eee 18 Tax Injunction Act, 28 … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Golden v. Zwickler

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969

If he does not do so, he is entirely barred from using this method of airing his views. … Foreign Affairs, the United States’ most influential periodical deal- ing with international policy, has frequently i in recent years» masked the names of its contributors, carrying leading articles

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

should not exclude any speaker from speaking or prevent any point of view from being aired within the School. … Yet the Government’s brief in FAJR nowhere mentions this Court’s decision in Claiborne, which clearly holds that acts of disassociation such as those before the Court are in and of themselves acts

Amicus Curiae Brief — Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann, 424 U.S. 192 | MOR Sretl et eel Me a tecent oe! Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U Ss. i71 (1967) Williams v. … Se: United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMann, 434 U.S. 192, 195-203 (1977): see also 115 Cong. Ree. 7076 (March 16, 1967) (Sen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

This matter was Owens-Illinois manufactured asbestos-containing thermal insulation products for a limited period of time ending in early 1958. … Comment b to Section 7 further explains that: “‘[hjarm’ implies a loss or detri- oe 2 ee ee a ae ee ae in some physical person ...

Amicus Curiae Brief — Boy Scouts of America v. Dale

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America, 17 Cal. 4th 670, 952 P.2d 218 (1998), holding that BSA is not a “business establishment” subject to California's Unruh Civil Rights Act, does not represent … respondent long before, nor do they demonstrate that Dale would have made comments regarding homosexuality in the context of a Scout meeting.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. U.S. & Mass. ex rel. Escobar, 136 S. Ct. 582 (2015) (No. 15-7)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Several circuits also refused to accept or reject implied certification claims during this period, in theory inviting filings. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Hendow v. … ‘3 The above analyses of filings and recoveries is bolstered by a final empirical finding that is not as amenable to clean graphical presentation as Figures 1 and 2 but is nonetheless revealing.