Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.27s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aaron Matthew Oleston, Petitioner v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 17, 2022
Oleston 2021 WI App 63, 399 Wis. 2d 323, 964 N.W.2d 549 (Wis. Ct App 2021) 12, 21 State v. Read 165 Vt. 141 (Vt. 1996). State v. Robinson 12, 21 2003 MT 364 (Mont. 2003) State v. … Oleston, 2021 WI App 63, 399 Wis. 2d 323, 964 N.W.2d 549 (Wis. Ct. App 2021). and is reproduced at App.104-113 The circuit court's oral decision is reproduced at App. 113-157.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 9, 2023
A at 4 (citing to McQuiggin, 569 U.S. at 386, 399; and Schlup, 513 U.S. at 330). 14 II. … Id., 569 U.S. at 399. 15 Petitioner presented his evidence in a timely state postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brandon Quane Hudson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2023
Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2005)........................................ 22 United States v. Grossman, 400 F.3d 212 (4th Cir. 2005)........................ 24, 25, 26, 27 United States v. … Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2005), Gonzales was arrested following a traffic accident for driving under the influence.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Langston, Petitioner v. Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2023
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965)............................................... 6 Southern Union Co. v. … United States, 380 U.S. 24, 31 (1965); see also Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970); Batson v.
Petitioners Brief — Ross v. Bernhard
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1969
The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on January 29, 1969 and was granted March 24, 1969. This Court’s jurisdiction is based on 28 USC §$1254(1). … This effectively caused the Corporation to pay third parties for advice for which the Corporation had already paid Lehman Brothers (A. 24-25).
396 U.S. 531Brief Amicus Curiae — United States v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1965
— No. 399 Unirep Staves oF AMERICA, i oe Petitioner, VS. … ' & . ; © 24 Seu et CONCLUSION .
381 U.S. 437Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 24, 2021
App. 24-25. … Cedarbrook Realty, Inc., 399 A.2d at 377 (quoting Bull v.
Petitioners Reply Brief on Reargument — Yellin v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief on Reargument · 1963
"irginia, 399 US. 344; Bates: v. ity, of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516; Shelton v. Tucker, 364 US,.479. … Donds,. 339 TLS. 382, 422, 24.
374 U.S. 109Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Kolovrat v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1961
Co., 219 N.Y. 343, 114 N.E. 399, — 402. : 15 Jones v. Meehan, 175 U.S. 1, 32 : oe * Lukich v. Department of Labor and Industries, 176 Wash. | 221, 29 P. (2d) 388, 390) © 14 Petersen v. … April 24, 1958, interpreting Article II of the Yugoslavian treaty, re- ' ferred to at page 18 of the petition for certiorari (App.
366 U.S. 187Brief for Petitioner — Conopco, Inc. v. May Department Stores Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Petitioner · 1995
O’ROURKE PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER 399 Park Avenue 31st Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 318-6000 PAUL W. CANE, JR. … O’ ROURKE PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER 399 Park Avenue 31st Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 318-6000 PAUL W. CANE, JR.
514 U.S. 1078Opposition Brief — Wolfenbarger v. Satterlee, 127 S. Ct. 1832 (2007) (No. 06-977)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
A Motion for Relief from Judgment was denied by the 4 Answer to Petition for Writ of Certiorari Circuit Court on July 24, 2001. The Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal November 4, 2002. … Eleven Mile Road Royal Oak, MI 48067 (248) 399-6930 Dated: February 6, 2007
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 1, 2019
Turkish, 192 N.J. 399, 930 A.2d 416 (2007) ................................................................. 11, 20 Alabama Women’s Center v. … Ed. 2d 665 (2016). 24 Id. at 2309. 22 9 and rewrites and further complicates the standard.25 Second, it rejected the rational basis to act standard for a strict review unlike prior cases.26 Third, the
Opposition Brief — South Carolina, Petitioner v. Angela D. Brewer
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · May 15, 2023
R. 399. Dr. Fulcher responded, “Not on a personal level, but on a professional level, generally speaking.” R. 399. When questioned about the number of pills Minor ingested, Dr. … App. 24.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aaron Jensen, Petitioner v. West Jordan City, Utah
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 26, 2021
Caribbean Forms Mfg., 399 F.3d 52 (1st Cir. 2005). … Rodriguez-Torres, 399 F.3d at 66.
Opposition — Shelton v. Carlton
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
Co., 633 F.2d 401 (5th Cir. 1980) 24, 25 Statutes 28 U.S.C. § 1254 (1) 2 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) 2 Fed. R. Evid. 403 23 Fed. R. Evid. 404 (b) 2, 24 F. R. Cw. P. 51 3,16 Sup. Ct. … (Tr. 2-399, 400). These individuals were Fr. Armand John Gilbert, Keith V. Ellis and Joy Michelle Bristo. Dr.
467 U.S. 1206Opposition — Slevin v. City of New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977) «sere eerrererreecece 24, 36 n v. … Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977) «ese e reer eee renee 24, 34, 36 Zablocki v.
464 U.S. 1017Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 6, 2019
Ct. 399 (2016) ........... 11, 12 Sullivan v. Hudson, 490 U.S. 877 (1989) .............................. 6 T-Mobile S., LLC v. City of Roswell, 135 S. … Ct. 399 (2016), relied on by the Amicus (Br. 33-34), similarly concerned an administrative refusal to reopen a prior final decision. 826 F.3d at 501.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Crosthwait Equipment Co. v. John Deere Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Code 1972, § 75-24- 51(6). 9. … Code Ann. § 75-24-51(6) (1972).
510 U.S. 991United For the United States — United States v. Seattle-First National Bank
Supreme Court brief · United For the United States · 1944
Bank, 101 F. 2d 399 (C. C. A. 9), compelled . … Bank, 101 F. 2d 399, that these transfers were exempt because they resulted “‘wholly by operation of law” within the mean-, _ ing of Article 35 .(r) (Appendix, infra, p. 26).
321 U.S. 583Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 8, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 415 (1986). But in 1996, Congress enacted AEDPA. … Papers 630, 631 (Apr. 24, 1996).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.