Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.81s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 31, 2020
in America, 29 Ecology L.Q. 71 (2002) .................. 15 Briggett, Joseph, Comment, An Ocean of Executive Authority: Courts Should Limit the President’s Antiquities Act Power To Designate Monuments … Joseph Briggett, 15 Comment, An Ocean of Executive Authority: Courts Should Limit the President's Antiquities Act Power To Designate Monuments in the Outer Continental Shelf, 22 Tul. Envtl.
Amicus Curiae Brief — SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1938
Wisconsi Sg ee Seep pa 48 Seaboard Air Line Ry. v- Blackwell, 244 U. S. 310.... 36 South Covington, ete. Ry. Ca. v. Kentucky, 252 U.S. , RNR Ne ROE? … Throughout this formative period the’ States were 3 Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 424, January, 1936. *H.
303 U.S. 177Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
. § 1536(b)(3)(A).......... 13 Ek od 12, 22 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 ef seq. (2000). … Army Corps of Engineers ("Army Corps”) Clean Water Act ("CWA") § 404 permits are sought.
551 U.S. 644Amicus Curiae Brief — Golden v. Zwickler
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
If he does not do so, he is entirely barred from using this method of airing his views. … Foreign Affairs, the United States’ most influential periodical deal- ing with international policy, has frequently i in recent years» masked the names of its contributors, carrying leading articles
394 U.S. 103Amicus Curiae Brief — TCI Cablevision, Inc. v. Central Telecommunications, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Statutes Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, P.L. I a a Newspaper Preservation Act, 15 U.S.C. §1801 SERS Oe cs See rR N ERT PN Miscellaneous FCC Dkt. No. … For example, the City’s geography makes reception of over-the-air broadcast signals very difficult. 610 F. Supp. at 894, n.3.
480 U.S. 910Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
This matter was Owens-Illinois manufactured asbestos-containing thermal insulation products for a limited period of time ending in early 1958. … Comment b to Section 7 further explains that: “‘[hjarm’ implies a loss or detri- oe 2 ee ee a ae ee ae in some physical person ...
521 U.S. 424Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1988) ..passim Standard Oil of California v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1%).
514 U.S. 645Amicus Curiae Brief — Bradley LeDure, Petitioner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2022
And the Court “ha[d] no doubt that subjecting international air carriers to strict liability for purely mental distress would be controversial for most signatory countries.” Id. … And the only way to avoid this burden (or the risk of penalties for non-compliance) would again be to shuttle otherwiseidle locomotives to designated repair or storage locations, even for short periods
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bolar Pharmaceutical Co. v. Roche Products, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984
They show only the increase during the 10-year period from about 1962 to 1972. … Congress has adopted compulsory licensing only for particular areas such as air pollution technology, 42 U.S.C. § 7404, and atomic energy, 42 U.S.C. § 2183. 15 III.
469 U.S. 856Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
The Federal Trade Commission has for 20 years held that it is “an unfair and deceptive act” to make a door-to-door sale without a three-day “cooling off” period for the buyer to change his mind. 16 … “Since the act of soliciting alms or contributions usually has as its objective an immediate act of charity, 1t has the potentiality for evoking highly personal and subjective reactions.
505 U.S. 830Amicus Curiae Brief — Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
THE CABLE TELEVISION INDUSTRY Cable television systems (some- times referred to as CATV) began in 1948 in mountain areas and rural areas where off-the-air reception was poor or unavailable. … A commentator has observed that “(ijt makes little sense for an individual copyright owner to brave the wrath . L.
415 U.S. 394Amicus Curiae Brief — Tropp v. Corporation of Lloyd's
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
It was preceded by the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, and the Investment Company Act of … The representations in (i) and (ii) were during the relevant period, untrue. (Paragraphs 375 and 376). vi.
564 U.S. 1046Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) ....... 4 Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992 (1984) .............. 24 Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96 n.14 (1983)); see also Qwest Corp. v.
544 U.S. 113Amicus Curiae Brief — Sierra Club v. Morton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972
In National Automatic Laundry Cleaning Council v. … This concern is reflected in numerous recent Acts relating to air pollution, water poliution, open space, and, most particu- larly, the Nationa! Environmental Policy Act.
405 U.S. 727Amicus Curiae Brief — De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
. 1001 et seq.: LI... 3. 18 § 3(37), 29 U.S.C. 10 . 3 § 514(a), 29 U.S.C. 110) 5, 7, 10, 19 Labor Mangement Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. 181 et seq.: I. . 3 L A eee 18 Tax Injunction Act, 28 … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 (1983).
520 U.S. 806Amicus Curiae Brief — Swift & Co. v. Wickham
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1965
United Air Lines, 346 U.S. 402; Federal Maritime Board v. … ‘This provision and similar comments in the legisla- five history must be understood, however, in light of the underlying purposes of the Act, t.e., the establish- ment of requisite standards for preparing
382 U.S. 111Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Scheffer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
“During the five year period from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1995, do you remember stealing anything?” … Under the Defense Authorization Act of 1986, the Sec- retary of Defense was directed to carry out research in the field of physiological detection of deception.
523 U.S. 303Amicus Curiae Brief — Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, 138 S. Ct. 43 (2017) (No. 16-1276)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Public Utilities Comm'n of Cal., ee I a caciiiesinmatincnebiesintesinsinintensmaseninoniin 18, 20, 21 Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 1348. … Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 1348.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 306 (2018) (No. 17-8151)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Ethics codes in medicine have developed across “virtually all” ancient civilizations, time periods, and independently of one another,’ and resurged as reminders to the profession of medicine’s core … They force the public to confront the enormity of the act. What people much prefer is a way to accomplish the deed while believing there is something humane about it.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Trade Commission v. Schering-Plough Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Rev. 201 (2002) ....... 0.0 e ccc cece. 12 ———— vil Marcy Lobanoff, Comment, Anti-Competitive Agreements Cloaked as “Settlements” Thwart the Purpose of the Hatch-Waxman Act, SO Gemay LF. … Rev. 201 (2002); Marcy Lobanoff, Comment, Anti-Competitive Agreements Cloaked as “Settlements” Thwart the Purpose of the Hatch-Waxman Act, 50 Emory LJ. 1331, 1353(2001); Kevin D.
546 U.S. 974
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.