Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
1.15s
Agency decision · Agency decision
of July 16, 2015 to April 10, 2018, and of Promised Land and Tahir for the time period of April 11, 2015 to April 10, 2018. … .”42 A violation is willful if “the employer knew that its conduct was prohibited by the Act or showed reckless disregard for the requirements of the Act.”43 In exercising discretion to determine the appropriate
Department of LaborAgency decision · Agency decision
Respondent contends the $219 should be capitalized under MACRS with a 27.5-year recovery period. … Petitioner did not contend in his posttrial briefs that any such deduction should be allowed, and he did not comment on respondent's proposed findings of fact regarding that letter.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Beer advertising and marketing materials should not depict the act of drinking. A-3 12. … Beer advertising and marketing materials should not depict the act of drinking. 11.
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Sec. 1009(c)(3) of the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988, Pub. … Reg. 1469 (Jan. 7, 1977) ("Various elections under the Tax Reform Act of 1976")). Petitioner must first establish that he suffered an NOL for the taxable year 1984.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
S violation within the review period. … The Ninth Circuit did not comment on the ALJ’s finding that BNSF requires reporting even if the pain is thought to be an aggravation of a prior injury.
Department of Labor☐ Check this box if no longer subject to
Agency decision · Agency decision
Filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Print or Type Responses) 1. … Form 5, completed as appropriate to include the additional comments.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
See Taxpayer First Act, Pub. L. No. 116-25, § 1001, 133 Stat. 981, 983 (2019). … Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
See Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.” … See SEC Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.”
Securities and Exchange CommissionSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Agency decision · Agency decision
of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rules lob-10 , l l dl-2, and lob-17 thereunder. … We kindly request that you provide us with your comments and any concerns relating to the reasoning contained in this letter and indicate to us whether we may submit a formal request for exemptive, interpretive
Securities and Exchange CommissionDepartment of the Treasury (2004)
Agency decision · Agency decision
My comments respecting the Section 10.22(a) charge are equally applicable here. … I do not read the A LJ’s comments as an indication that he viewed RespondentAppellant’s actions (or inactions) as admissions.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
See Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.” … See SEC Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.”
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
See Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.” … The date entered has to be later than the date entered in Start Period field. 19 Act Radio Button; 33 40 For certain filings by investment companies, the field identifies Act or Acts when the form
Securities and Exchange CommissionThe New Ireland Fund, Inc. : No Action, Interpretive and/or Exemptive Letter of March 15, 2004
Agency decision · Agency decision
If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please call me at (202) 942-0653. Sincerely, Christian T. … (the "Fund"), a Maryland corporation registered as a closed-end management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act").
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The period within which Ps could file a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court expired. … The Plan is a defined benefit plan as described under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), Pub. L. No. 93-406, 88 Stat. 829, as amended.
United States Tax CourtSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Agency decision · Agency decision
of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"). … If you have any further questions/comments, please advise. Luke E. Sims 3562 N.
Securities and Exchange CommissionUNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2006)
Agency decision · Agency decision
He stated that whenever he speaks to an agent by phone he assumes that the call is recorded and therefore would not make an improper comment. … Even assuming she acted in such a manner that did not permit Diehl to threaten her.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
See Press Release 2004-89, “SEC Staff to Publicly Release Comment Letters and Responses.” … The date entered has to be later than the date entered in Start Period field. 19 Act Radio Button; 33 40 For certain filings by investment companies, the field identifies Act or Acts when the form
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). 2. … Security Futures Product Exchanges are also required to update certain information filed on Form 1-N on a periodic basis.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Respondent contends the $219 should be capitalized under MACRS with a 27.5-year recovery period. … Petitioner did not contend in his posttrial briefs that any such deduction should be allowed, and he did not comment on respondent's proposed findings of fact regarding that letter.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
After the series aired, petitioner brought suit in the 224th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, based upon defamation due to libelous and false statements, invasion of privacy, infliction … $11,500,000 total actual damages minus the $7 million actual damages which were settled for $3,100,000. 11 Respondent calculated postjudgment interest on the first $22 million of the judgment assuming a period
United States Tax Court
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.