Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Watson, Mississippi Secretary of State, Petitioner v. Republican National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 10, 2025

Ct. 921, 927 (2024) (Gorsuch, J., concurring) (cleaned up) (first quotation); id. at 930 16 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring) (second quotation); see also id. at 934–35 (Jackson, J., dissenting); Does 1-3 v … Id. at 71; see id. at 72 (Election Day is when “the final act of selection” must take place); cf. Voting Integrity Project, Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

Government, acting through the courts, is effectively crippling American industry. … It raises the stakes page 9 in the tort system by introducing a totally open-ended factor-- a jury license to award, as in the case at bar, literally any amount of money out of thin air.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Peter B. Chiafalo, Levi Jennet Guerra, and Esther Virginia John, Petitioners v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020

Period dictionaries identify both broad and narrow accepted usages of the terms “elector,” “vote” and “ballot.” … serve as an elector limited to what Article II, Section 1 expressly permits, then states could not impose further, sensible eligibility criteria such as residency, age, competency, party affiliation or a clean

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tony K. McDonald, et al., Petitioners v. Sylvia Borunda Firth, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 19, 2022

This case provides a clean, simple vehicle to make these clarifications ..................................................... 15 CONCLUSION ............................................................. … McCoski, JUDGES IN STREET CLOTHES: ACTING ETHICALLY OFF-THE-BENCH 101-03 (Fairleigh Dickinson U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

alleging that respondents had violated the Sher- man Act, 15 U.S.C. | et seq., by conspiring during a fif- teen year period to “ ‘fix, raise and maintain prices and to inhibit or eliminate competition … (amending Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to “encourage, develop, and attain an air transportation system which relies on competitive market forces to determine the quality, variety, and price of air services

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2022

Ct. 1926, 45-46 (2022) (Alito, J.); see also id. at 48 (“The real issue to me is the evasion of notice-and-comment. … Cir. 1994) (Randolph, J., dissenting) (explaining that remand without vacatur “rests on thin air” and that “the controlling statute— 5 U.S.C. §706(2)(A)—flatly prohibits it”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 103 S. Ct. 2890 (1983). The opinion in Shaw stressed that the exceptions from pre-emption in ERISA are “narrow.” Jd. at 2902, 2903. … Deere. & Company Delta Air Lines Inc. Digital Equipment Corp. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company The Dow Chemical Company Dresser Industries, Inc. E.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rasul v. Bush

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, gE ae een eae § B. … The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, Even In Wartime.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Int'l Refugee Assistance Project, 138 S. Ct. 50 (2017) (No. 16-1436)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

World Trade Center Tumbled, Politifact (Nov. 22, 2015, 6:17 PM), http://www.politifact.com/ truth-o-meter/statements/2015/nov/22/donald- trump/fact-checking-trumps-claim-thousands-new- RARER SRP AIRES … THE EXECUTIVE ORDER AT ISSUE PUNISHES INDIVIDUALS BASED ON THEIR RELIGION, HARKENING BACK TO SHAMEFUL PERIODS OF OUR NATION’S HISTORY.

Amicus Curiae Brief — WS Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., Int'l

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Air America, Inc., 482 F. Supp. 3 (D.D.C. 1979) (military procure- ment decision is Act of State). 48 425 U.S. at 693 (emphasis added). #9 Jd. at 694. … See also Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 443, comment d (1987); Restatement (Second) of Foreign Relations Law § 41, comment f (1965) (“An agency of an acting state is in a better position

Amicus Curiae Brief — Colorado Department of State, Petitioner v. Micheal Baca, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020

Period dictionaries identify both broad and narrow accepted usages of the terms “elector,” “vote” and “ballot.” … serve as an elector limited to what Article II, Section 1 expressly permits, then states could not impose further, sensible eligibility criteria such as residency, age, competency, party affiliation or a clean

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Gates (No. 06-691)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Rather, it holds that 8 Compare Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20, § 14, 1 Stat. 73, 81-82, with Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, ch. 28, § 1, 14 Stat. 385. 9A punitive discharge is one of nine types of authorized … Sandel, Comment, Other-Than-Honorable Military Administrative Discharges: Time for Confrontation, 21 San Diego L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Morales

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

air make the area a sanctuary for people.” … Code/Local Laws art. §§4, 908, 909, 910 (Scott & M’Cullough ed. 1860); Acts of Feb. 15, 1791, 5 N.H. Laws: First Constitutional Period (Metcalf ed. 1916), at 691-92; Act of June 10, 1799, N.J.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

See, e.g., Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450 U.S. 346, 352-356 (1981); Farmer v. Arab- ian Am. Oil Co., 379 U.S. 227 (1964). … In this case, the Death on the High Seas Act contains no provision regarding costs, which means that respondents’ asserted right to costs necessarily is predicated on Rule 54(d) rather than on the Act

Amicus Curiae Brief — Employers Insurance Company of Wausau v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

When courts act in this fashion, they undermine what one commentator has identified as “the primary social purpose” of the adversar- ial judicial process, that is “deciding disputes in a manner that … If a PRP letter qualifies as a “suit,” and the letter is silent as to how contamination occurred, or whether any “property damage” took place within the policy period of the in- surer’s policy, the

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Election Com'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

CONSTITUTION Es 5 irk os. beeuinen 64d wks seat 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate’s character, actions, or fitness for office

Amicus Curiae Brief — McCain v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (Nos. 06-970, 06-969)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

CONSTITUTION IE 3565p -0d 3 4seoee ded nes cewasnnes 1, passim STATUTES Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. … The district court essentially agreed, finding that the ads did “not mention an election, a candidacy, or a political party, nor ... comment on a candidate's character, actions, or fitness for office

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marlean A. Ames, Petitioner v. Ohio Department of Youth Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2024

of public comment, this provision did not make it into the final written practice standards. … (cleaned up). CONCLUSION In Muldrow v. City of St.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown v. Legal Foundation of Wash.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

The Court found this question to be easily answered in favor of the City, commenting that this “statement of the con- tention seems to us to be enough.” Jd. … F uller, 409 U.S. 488 (1973), for example, the federal govern- ment took a ranch from an owner who leased nearby land under the Taylor Grazing Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cal. Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. v. ANZ Sec., Inc., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-373)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

, Not Just the Securities Act Period ............ 31 Repose Periods Are a Legislative Judgment So Any Changes Should Be Ee WII sors cosaieirentenincsisincteeesdions 33 IIIT Gitiinicnciniina coucsiscschsbninseinotienepucaiiiunaal … C, Allowing Tolling Would Undermine Other, Longer Repose Periods, Not Just the Securities Act Period Moreover, even assuming that the Securities Act’s repose period creates special problems—and there