Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.17s

  • Respondents Brief — Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Riverside

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986

    Alabama, 399 U.S. 1, 9-10 (1970). … In contrast, preliminary hearings rarely involve such issues of general public concern. 24 24 We disagree with petitioner's assessment that suppression motions are "a standard part of the bill of

    478 U.S. 1
  • Amicus Brief — United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977

    Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 402 (1965). … No. 94-73 (July 24, 1975).

    430 U.S. 144
  • Amicus Brief — Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Mississippi

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982

    Dennison, 65 U.S. (24 How.) 66 (1861) .... 18 Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U.S. 1 (1888) ..... 6. cece eee eee 24 Maryland v. EPA, 530 F.2d 215 (4th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded sub nom. EPA v. … The Minnesota Raie Cases, 230 U.S. at 399 (emphasis supplied).

    456 U.S. 742
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

    See id. at 24, 11627. … See id. at 24.

    546 U.S. 1031
  • Petition — LICAVOLI v. UNITED STATES (Nos. 83-1657, 83-1573, 83-1801)

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

    (Tr., 24) (Emphasis supplied). … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970).

  • Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Gill v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1953

    SS 2, 13, 24 Sevtion 1145, Title 18, U. 8. … Yellow Cab Transit Co., 321 U. 8. 383, 399, 88 L. Ed. 814, 825, 64 S.

    346 U.S. 825
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Peter M. Hoffman, et al., Petitioners v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 7, 2019

    Caseer, 399 F.3d 828 (6th Cir. 2005).........................17, 24 United States v. Farinella, 558 F.3d 695 (7th Cir. 2009).............26, 27, 30, 34 United States v. … United States, 531 U.S. 12, 24-45 (2000).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Association of Club Executives of Dallas, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. City of Dallas, Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 1, 2024

    Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015) . . . 13 Cent. Radio Co. Inc. v. City of Norfolk, 811 F.3d 625 (4th Cir. 2016) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 City of Austin v. … Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015); Cent. Radio Co. Inc. v. City of Norfolk, 811 F.3d 625, 632 (4th Cir. 2016); Lucero v. Early, 873 F.3d 466, 471 (4th Cir. 2017).

  • Petition — Hernandez v. Texas

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

    Georgia, 429 U.S. 122, 97 S.Ct. 399, 50 L.Ed.2d 399 (1976). … $10, 68 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.24 776 (1968).

    462 U.S. 1144
  • Brief for Respondent — Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973

    Blue Grass Stockyards Co., 399 F. 2d 868 (6th Cir., 1968) Denver Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 306 F. Supp. 289 (D. … , 1a 6d > 6e Se & 7 2, 13, 14, 24, 32, 3a 7a(1) 2, 13, 24, 6a 7a(2) 2, 7, 13, 14, 6a 7a(8) 2, 7, 14, 24, 6a 7a(9) sidbiekcacgcaiine 2, 14, 7a 7b 2, 32, Te 8 2, 12, 32, 8a Sa) ......

    409 U.S. 289
  • Opposition — IGNACIO A. ORTIZ Z v. ARIZONA (No. 81-6385)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981

    Baker 399 F.2d 681 (10th Cir. 1968) Williams v. New York 337 U.S. 241 (1949) Zant v. … Baker, 399 F. 2d 681 (‘Oth Cir. 1968); Miller v. Crouse, 346 F.2d 301 (10th Cir. 1965); Olson v.

  • Petition — Shelton v. Carlton

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

    He was a graduate of the Wharton School of Finance, and at the time of his death was comptroller of the eastern sales region of the Hewlett Packard Corporation (TR 1-24, 26). … Record, vol. 2, at 399-400. We disagree. During the testimony of Dr.

    467 U.S. 1206
  • Petition — McFayden-Snider v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

    The trial court denied this motion on June 24, 1977. On the authority of Abney v. … California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).

    435 U.S. 995
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Interstate Transit Lines v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1943

    Ed. 399." … Excerpts from his brief in that case which illustrate that emphasis are set out below in the Appendix p. 24}. 2.

    319 U.S. 590
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 15, 2026

    Id. at 399. … R.53 150; R.98 at 23–24.

  • brief for appellant — Rogers v. Friedman

    Supreme Court brief · brief for appellant · 1978

    In its Motion to Affirm or Dismiss at page 24 n. 4, TOA has contended that the argument that § 2.02 infringes upon Dr. … Jay Rogers and the Senior Citizens in Nos. 77-1163 and 77-1186 at 24-27).

    435 U.S. 967
  • Reader Aids

    Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Aug 17, 1994

    .................39394 91...................................................39711 189..................................................39395 257..................................................40836 399 … ...............39440 23 CFR 1212.................................................39256 1313.................................................40470 24

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Zelman v. Simmons-Harris

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    THE COURT BELOW ERRED IN ASSESSING 24 Purdon’s Pa. Statutes §15-1501-C 8 THE SECTARIAN EFFECT OF THE OHIO PILOT 24 Purdon’s Pa. Statutes §20-2001-B 2 SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM IN ISOLATION FROM 38 U.S. … Essex, 342 F Supp 399, 412-413 (SD Ohio), affd, 409 US 808, 34 L Ed 2d 69, 93 S Ct 61 (1972).

    536 U.S. 639
  • Reply Brief — Smith v. Stewart

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1974

    (b) As construed and applied by the Appellate Court, Ch. 24, §21-27, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969 violates the above Ae COWRA! … Blankenship, 399 Ill. 136, 77 N.E. 2d 325 (1948). 2. Verification of some of the facts on plaintiff’s in- formation and belief is authorized by law. Dial v.

    419 U.S. 873
  • Opposition Brief — Bruce Zachary Pugh, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Nov 13, 2020

    App. 17-24. petitioner’s appeal, this Court decided Rehaif v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019). … Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (2020), appears to be at odds with the decision below on the substantive question of whether to recognize forfeited Rehaif errors even when the defendant’s criminal record and period

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.