Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Amicus Curiae Brief — National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1969
first half of that period had been satisfactory. Moreover neithér Johnson could recall ever having criticized his work to Paxton during that whole period. … No. supervisor. ever’‘made any comment: to. Aldridge about any other motor or engine that he worked on.
395 U.S. 575Amicus Curiae Brief — Willcutts v. Bunn
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1931
The Collector oe ee AiR ee Dee lea cae oc eres - SSCL ge oe of me te ” We eee . oye 8 ot) at ee kha ad PRS. xan Va Sle eeu Boe So rte) RS Sea's + demurred to the petition (R. 3). … Dict.; Century Dict.). we find little to add to the succinct definition adopted in two cases arising under the Corporation Tax Act of 1909 (Stratton’s Inde- pendence Vv.
282 U.S. 216Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605, 607 (1950). … In implement- ing the constitutional mandate in the Patent Act, Congress has granted inventors the exclusive right to practice their inventions for a period of years in exchange for public disclosure
520 U.S. 17Amicus Curiae Brief — Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 536 U.S. 903 (2002) (contesting expansion of federal regulatory control over beaches via the Clean Water Act) and before the Michigan Court of Appeals in Glass … As one commentator noted: Either the Supreme Court meant something when it decided Williamson County, or it did not.
544 U.S. 280Amicus Curiae Brief — Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
They will have developed cancer, mesothelioma, or other disease caused by asbestos in the air where they worked years ago. … A number of commentators have suggested such a delayed opt-out as a means of preserving the rights of future claimants. See Wolfman & Morrison, supra at 478. John C.
521 U.S. 591Amicus Curiae Brief — Keith M. Wilkins, Petitioner v. Steve Herron, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 1, 2025
The marketing managers led the entire audience in thrusting their fists into the air (the marketing symbol of Bextra) and pounding them against their upraised hands in unison to symbolize the power of … The uselessness and concealed risks of the COVID-19 vaccines “On February 4, 2020, the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] determined pursuant to his authority under section 564 of the FD&C Act that
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jaffe v. Snow
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Linde Air Products Co., 336 Nee sas a edibalatennincdeiibilavneddeiondsieins 13 Haitian Refugee Center v. Gracey, 809 F.2d 794 (D.C. … Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, 275 (1949); see also Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 665 (1987).
510 U.S. 911Amicus Curiae Brief — Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S. Ct. 923 (2018) (No. 17-965)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT Where a factory unlawfully pollutes the air, may a district court enjoin the pollution? … American Law Institute, Principles of the Law of Ag- gregate Litigation § 2.04 comment a (2010). The government thus errs in asserting that there is something “troubling” (U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Revenue of Ky. v. Davis
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Code Ann. § 6—3-—1-3.5. 6 Tax Nondiscrimination Act, Pub. L. … . §§14502(b), 401 16(d)\(2\(A) (extend- ing the protections of the 4-R Act to property owned by motor and air carriers); 49 U.S.C. §§14505, 40116(b) (prohibiting the States or their po- litical subdivisions
553 U.S. 328Amicus Curiae Brief — Boumediene v. Bush
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73.00.00... cee ceeeeeeees 2 Military Commissions Act of 2006, Pub. … The arguments have been aired and re-aired. The time is ripe for this Court to address the constitutional infirmity of the MCA’s attempt to curtail the right of habeas corpus.
553 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Samsung Elecs. Co. v. Apple Inc., 136 S. Ct. 1453 (2016) (No. 15-777)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Vite os . 20 —— § 289 ' . 3-12, 14-16, 20, 28-32 Pe RY calle Big ma aS PP 3, 22-23 Act of July 19, 1952, ch. 950,66 Stat.792 ..... ll America Invents Act, Pub. L. … And to a certain degree, the total profits rule actually acts punitively.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dahda v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 940 (2018) (No. 17-43)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
Communication again advanced with the invention of modern cellular phones, which facilitate mobile communications “over the air on a radio frequency to a cell site.” S. Rep. No. 541, at 3563. … Law enforcement also has the ability to capture signals “as they are transmitted over the air,” or through active surveillance, using a device called an International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI
Amicus Curiae Brief — Charles Barton, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 8, 2022
A journalist seeking comment from an individual on a sensitive matter previously thought secret could embarrass that individual. … product from the act of creation.”)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
District Courts-Civil Cases Commenced, by Nature of Suit and District, During 12-Month Period Ending September 30, 2003, 2003 Judicial Business (available at http://www.uscourts.gov/ judbus2003/appendices … underlying important question of federal law to be resolved implicitly by this decision is whether the American public can be deprived of the technical advance of home VTR reception of free off-the-air
545 U.S. 913Amicus Curiae Brief — Chicago v. Morales
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
PROBLEM OF HOMELESSNESS University study, over a five-year period from 1985 to 1990, 8.5 million people, 4.6% of the U.S. population, were 14 Martha R. … With small, overcrowded rooms, and without air conditioning on hot summer days, inadequately housed Americans share many challenges in common with homeless _ people.
527 U.S. 41Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 31, 2020
in America, 29 Ecology L.Q. 71 (2002) .................. 15 Briggett, Joseph, Comment, An Ocean of Executive Authority: Courts Should Limit the President’s Antiquities Act Power To Designate Monuments … Joseph Briggett, 15 Comment, An Ocean of Executive Authority: Courts Should Limit the President's Antiquities Act Power To Designate Monuments in the Outer Continental Shelf, 22 Tul. Envtl.
Amicus Curiae Brief — eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
SciMed Life Systems, Inc., 852 F.Supp. 813, 861-62 (D.Minn. 1994) (acting in response to public health concerns to delay entry of injunction by a year to allow a transition period for doctors to changeover … Oftentimes the doctrinal explanation for this result is that the right in land is a right to exclude, period.
546 U.S. 1029Amicus Curiae Brief — Gill v. Whitford, 138 S. Ct. 52 (2017) (No. 16-1161)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Gubbeleaddacn sd saki diletaane tudes 2 ERAT AIRE Sele PSE Se AR OED asapaainid Aatahaacivesinian 3 I. … More than 20,000 individuals and groups submitted written comments or proposed maps.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 15, 2021
Laws ch. 625 ............................29 PERIODICALS A Search For Knives, BUFFALO DAILY COURIER, Mar. 5, 1888 ...............................................................9 Angelo Carbone Insane, … Judge Foster’s Acts Now Under Review, N.Y. TIMES, May 18, 1912, at 24.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris Inc. v. Cabarrus County
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Twmey involved a mayor acting as judge in a proceeding from which he re- ceived a percentage of the fine he imposed. … The officers in estimating the value act judicially.”” 111 U.S. at 710.
512 U.S. 1228
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.