Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.23s
Reply Brief — Diontai Moore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 10, 2025
Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) .................................................. 4 Williams v. United States, 2025 WL 1603600 (U.S. … United States, No. 24-6517 (U.S. May 19, 2025).
Agency decision · Agency decision
See id. sec. 4.01, 2013-43 I.R.B. at 399-400. … Respondent - 24 [*24] "disputes that any alleged abuse prevented petitioner from challenging the returns in question."
United States Tax CourtPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Gregory C. Raymore, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 14, 2020
Id *24, 30-31. … Id. at 399-400.
Respondents Brief — Lewis v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1996
Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (19700 . . 24 Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ....... 3, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 31 Blanton v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), and Blanton v.
518 U.S. 322Ordinance Number 7.001. Amended (2017)
Tribal code · Tribal code
Open all year, 24 hours per day. … Open all year, 24 hours per day. No daily limit except as imposed by the Committee by regulation for conservation purposes.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — San Jacinto Sand Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969
Thompson, 152 Tex. 270, 256 S.W. 2d 399 (Tex. … Thompson, 256 S.W. 2d 399 (Tex. Sup.).
393 U.S. 1027Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 16, 2022
Elections Comm’n, 399 Wis. 2d 623, 666–67 -3- (2021); Stay Appl.22–23. … Johnson, 399 Wis. 2d at 673–77 (Hagedorn, J., concurring).
Opposition Brief — Byron Lewis Black, Petitioner v. Tennessee
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 3, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ................................................................................... passim Heller v. … Acts, ch. 399, § 2 ................................................................................ 8 2021 Tenn. Pub.
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 1998
These violations of Parts 385 and 390-399 of this subchapter constitute a middle range of violations. … A driver placed out of service for 24 hours for violating the alcohol prohibitions of 49 CFR 392.5(a) or (b) who drives during that period is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,750 for each violation
63 FR 12413Transportation DepartmentFederal Highway AdministrationPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Young v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. … Equally important in this regard, standards of trial 24.
410 U.S. 967Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Wendlinger v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1945
Waldman, 53 Fed. (2nd) 24. That ease. … Waldman, 53 Fed. (2d) 24.”
324 U.S. 882Safety Zones: Festival of Sail San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 22, 2008
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 399-7436. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or the 24- hour Command Center via telephone at (415) 399-3547. (d) Effective period.
73 FR 42526Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSecurity Zones; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 9, 2023
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, Waterways Management Division; telephone 415-399-3585, email SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … (3) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative by VHF Marine Radio channel 21A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
88 FR 77203Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardReply Brief — Duane Leo Ehmer, Darryl William Thorn, and Jake Ryan, Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 30, 2024
King, Juries, Democracy, and Petty Crime, 24 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 817 (2022) ........ 6, 10 John M. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 76 (1970) (Black, J., concurring). Contemporaneous dictionaries and other authoritative Founding Era sources support that conclusion.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 17, 2025
But I treat it as proffered.” 15-CV-200-RH Docket entry No. 116 at 271:24-272:1 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 13, 2022). … Virginia, 527 U.S. 116, 123–24 (1999) (quoting Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 845 (1990)); see also Tennessee v.
Opposition Brief — Perez v. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
Bertram Yacht Corp., 42 N.Y.2d 1033, 399 N.Y.S.2d 202 (1977)......ccscessccseees. iaciniiceukenipensealle 4 First Federal Savings Bank v. … (Appendix K page 123) On October 21, 2008, Petitioner appealed from the Trial Court’s September 24, 2008 Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale.
562 U.S. 1063Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 10, 2024
(quoting Adkins, 310 U.S. at 399). … See p. 24, supra.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roy E. Terrell, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 5, 2024
WL 3514130 (Fla. 4th DCA July 24, 2024). … Id., 399 U.S. at 98–99. But it concluded that such “purely historical considerations” were not dispositive. Id. at 99.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David Louis Whitehead, Petitioner v. Netflix, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2017
LLP et al. 5:12-cv-399.) Plaintiff requests perm ission to file this current suit. … (Record Documents 21, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 32).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Edwards v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) .........cecceceees passim Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 (1973)..........cccccece0-. 23 Nance v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 163 n.15 (1970), this Court noted that its prior decision in Bridges v.
519 U.S. 964
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.