Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 11, 1998
Air Act (Act). … The terms used in this subpart are defined in the Clean Air Act (Act) or in this section as follows: Administrator means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
63 FR 48819Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 5, 2012
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This final rule is effective on November 5, 2012. … on the public contrary to the stated purpose of the Clean Air Act * * *” ( See, Comments at 3).
77 FR 60910Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Secondary Lead Smelting
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 13, 1997
The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposal. Any parties interested in commenting on the amendments should do so at this time. DATES: Effective Date. … Test Methods for Determining Hood Face and Doorway Air Velocities Comment: One petitioner (Docket ID No.
62 FR 32209Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 17, 2007
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 111 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: August 8, 2007.
72 FR 46188Environmental Protection AgencyPublic Meeting of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 2, 2026
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants.
91 FR 40536Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 3, 2011
See Clean Air Act sections 110(a), 110(l), and 193. … There is nothing in the comment that convinces EPA that the EBTA program should not be approved. The Clean Air Act was enacted by Congress. 42 U.S.C.A. 7401.
76 FR 15Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 17, 1998
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Mojave … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
63 FR 43884Environmental Protection AgencyDesignation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 8, 1996
Portions of LaSalle County were designated as a moderate PM nonattainment area upon enactment of the Clean Air Act (Act) Amendments of 1990 (November 15, 1990). 56 FR 56694 at 56705-706, 56714 (November … The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act. PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES 1.
61 FR 41342Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Metal Cans
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 6, 2006
13, 2003, under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … We will not institute a second comment period on the direct final rule amendments. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Judicial Review .
71 FR 1378Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · May 5, 2003
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 7, 2003.
68 FR 23604Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Aug 9, 2016
(B) Scope of Preemption and Criteria for a Waiver Under the Clean Air Act Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. 7543(a), provides: No state or any political subdivision … Air Act.
81 FR 52680Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 23, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 21169Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 30, 1998
None of the documents referenced by EPA in the PPNC docket are listed in the March 1996 NOX Policy Documents for the Clean Air Act of 1990 (EPA-452/R-96-005). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 23668Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; District of Columbia; Creation of Synthetic Minor Permit Program
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 20, 2025
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 52305Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 5, 2003
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 33638Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 24, 1999
DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing on or before December 9, 1999. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 66143Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 18, 2010
EPA is approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … read section 176(c)(4)(E) of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 34644Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 11, 2007
Public Comments Our February 14, 2007 proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period, which closed on March 16, 2007. We received no comments on our proposal during this period. III. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 26718Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 30, 2003
These revisions are being proposed for approval in accordance with the Clean Air Act (the Act). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 29, 2004. … Clean Air Act Requirements The Clean Air Act (the Act) requires that for certain ozone nonattainment areas, states are to submit plans demonstrating a reduction in volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions
68 FR 75191Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Michigan; Part 18 and Part 19 Revisions
Federal Register · Rule · May 12, 2021
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … (See section 307(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act.)
86 FR 25954Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.