Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Roberts v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 468 U.S. 85 .............. 10, 19 Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 .......... 8,9 Sly v. P.R. Mallory & Co., 712 F.2d 1209 .......2.000...... 9 Sutton Vv. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 105 & n.25 (1983) ; Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 451 U.S. 504, 522-523, (1981).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 17, 2018

Given that the issue had existed for a substantial period of time, it is implausible that in 1996, when Congress enacted section 1158 in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act … Air Regulatory Grp. v. E.P.A., 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2444 (2014).

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Association for Gun Rights, Inc., Petitioner v. Jeff Mangan, in His Official Capacity as the Commissioner of Political Practices for the State of Montana, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 15, 2020

registration as a political committee); id. § 13-37-201 9 (organization statement filing requirement); id. § 1337-201 (organizational treasurer and treasurer activities requirement); id. § 13-37-226 (periodic … permit the Court to affirm the continued viability of its precedents and to announce that mere independent speech may not alone trigger PAC-like regulatory burdens. 15 Moreover, this case provides a clean

Amicus Curiae Brief — Douglas v. California Pharmacists Association, (2009) (No. 1158)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

While CMS requires that states provide public notice of proposed changes to payment methodologies, states need not solicit or incorporate public comments in re- sponse to-this notice. 42 C.F.R. 447.205 … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96 n.14 (1983).

Amicus Curiae Brief — International Medication Systems, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1982

The federal gov- ernment’s action was merely temporary, and did not “interfere with the States’ freedom of action beyond a very limited, specific period of time.” … Environmental Protection Agency, 645 F.2d 701 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1081 (1981); Hughes Air Corp. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donovan v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

The federal gov- ernment’s action was merely temporary, and did not “interfere with the States’ freedom of action beyond a very limited, specific period of time.” … Environmental Protection Agency, 645 F.2d 701 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1081 (1981); Hughes Air Corp. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — David Seth Worman, et al., Petitioners v. Maura T. Healey, Attorney General of Massachusetts, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 25, 2019

A recent report by the Congressional Research Service examined mass shooting data over a period of 15 years. … This is an important consideration in law enforcement work, and to citizens acting in defense of their homes where there may be other family members present.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 139 S. Ct. 1780 (2019) (No. 18-483)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

For example, Casey upheld Pennsylvania’s 24-hour waiting period because of “[t]he idea that important decisions will be more informed and deliberate if they follow some period of reflection.” … In addition, in affirming an injunction against an Indiana law requiring an 18-hour waiting period following an ultrasound, the Seventh Circuit cited a lack of evidence that the waiting period would

Amicus Curiae Brief — Theodore H. Frank, et al., Petitioners v. Paloma Gaos, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2018

U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., as amended; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.; and the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. … The 23 class here is the very definition of vague, as it includes anyone who used Google during a seven-and-a-half year period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rogers Lacaze, Petitioner v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 21, 2018

Const. of 1852................................................... 10 Periodicals Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review, 125 Harv. L. … Reformers believed that the people—who went to the polls with no selfish bias—would create a fair and impartial judiciary, id. at 112, because only judges who “present themselves with clean hands and a

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 15, 2018

For example, Casey upheld Pennsylvania’s 24-hour waiting period because of “[t]he idea that important decisions will be more informed and deliberate if they follow some period of reflection.” … In addition, in affirming an injunction against an Indiana law requiring an 18-hour waiting period following an ultrasound, the Seventh Circuit cited a lack of evidence that the waiting period would 16

Amicus Curiae Brief — Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

See, e.g., Hearst Newspapers: Statement of Professional Principles (“We must make a particular effort to seek comment from those portrayed in a critical manner.”’); Society of Professional Journalists … Could the government deem the airing of this interview, and the presentation of the group’s views, to be a “service” provided to the organization?

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ivy v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

REV. 308 (1985) ....... 1] Agent Orange Act of 1991, Public L. No. 102-4, 1D Beek. 5 SRP es wie sates ae ee ee 3 Morris S. … Newberg and Alba Conte Newberg, supra note 6, § 17.39 ("Any- time a mass tort gives rise to injuries that occur over a period of time. . .

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

As commentators have observed, however, "all of the [petitioners’] actions are subject to regulation and prosecution at the state level." Stephan E. … United States Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) ("SWANCC"), this Court analyzed regulations promulgated under the Clean Water Act that extended the federal govern- ment’s authority to all

Amicus Curiae Brief — Operation Rescue v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

United States Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) ("SWANCC"), this Court analyzed regulations promulgated under the Clean Water Act that extended the federal govern- ment’s authority to all … The "Migratory Bird Rule” was an administrative interpretation; the Clean Water Act itself merely granted regulatory authority over "navigable waters." 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

App. 15a (commenting on the 1948 revisions of the Hobbs Act, which, according to the court of appeals were either “formal, stylistic changes” or “substantive changes, whether advert- ently or inadvertently … One of his books, Peacemaking Behind Bars, is an account of his time spent in jail for a 1993 action at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in Goldsboro, N.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

(b) The Sheet Metal Air Conditioning Contractors National Association represents 4,500 contractors in the sheet metal and air conditioning industry. … Then they later seek reimbursecent of such costs through the monthly or periodic progress payment process.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BURLINGTON N. & SFR CO. v. White

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Hanna did not pay enough attention to her during the period when Ms. Hanna was her supervisor, it was reasonable to expect closer monitoring by Ms. Doyle to ensure that Ms. … South Coast Air Quality Mami. Dist., 541 U.S. 246 (2004)... eee 13 Estades-Negroni vy. Assocs. Corp. of N. Am. Fee Fade Fe Cee Ga: Be icercentepnnicitiieanioinnnin 36 Faragher v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

TRPA’s public records show that 45 development rights, 17 of which were located in Washoe County, were transferred during that same period. … Chris Bowman and Patrick Hoge, Runoff, Air Pollution Cloud Waters of Crystal-Clear Lake, Sacramento Bee, Dec. 8, 1996, at A8.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988

Holt, Magna Carta 323 (1965)... 18 Jeffries, A Comment on the Constitutionality of Punitive Damages, 72 Va. L. Rev. 139 (1986) ....7, 12, 21 F. … See generally Jeffries, A Comment on the Constitutionality , runitive Damages, 72 Va. L.