Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Opposition Brief — Westfall v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
.+4++5: Fa er cd sn dade S e's eos 40 beus SCP MENS 24 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Sup-CeR. 10....2cccccccccsvvcvcseseveevavsvesceeses 24 eS Se) eperere rrr errr rere ere eee err ere ] Sup.Ct.R. … Vol. 2, pp. 399-400, Plaintiff's Opposition To Defen- dant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit P).° On or about January 3, 1991, Mr.
510 U.S. 993Reply Brief — Stollings v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975
Res. 399—Pub. Res. 101) c. 586, 45 Stat. 1540, 1541 (2a) wees 16 ili PAGE The ED ssetiesicsnerniidiinicatpuih viciouiieianicbilaianbinimabiaciions 20 BU Ti eatin’ FA. … Resolution 399—Pub. Res.
419 U.S. 1121Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Safeway Stores, Inc. v. West
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1950
Company, 24 F. (2d) 671 Kramer v. Mills Lumber Company, 24 Fed. (2d) 313 Brown v. Dorney Park, 167 Fed. (2d) 453 In the case of Johnson v. United States, 333 U. … Ct. 399, and Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U. S. 233, 33 8. Ct. 416.
339 U.S. 952Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Johnson v. Kersh Lake Drainage District
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942
S. 399 ; Pa cet 20 : Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64 scinacicacte aa Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339.......--_-__...._ 20 : Grubb v. … Patterson, 263 U. 8. 399, 402; Seagraves v. Wal- lace, 69 F. 2d 163, 164, 165.
316 U.S. 673Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943
City of Boston, 142 Mass. 24 (6 N. E. 840); Minns v. Billing, 183 Mass. 126 (66 N. E. 593, 5 DL. R. A. N. … S. 399, p. 415), but at the same time as the respondent’s claim was heard, and at the time set on their own petition for a hearing of their case.
320 U.S. 758Petition — First National Bank & Trust Co. in Alton v. Berke
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
App. 2d 399, 158 N.E. 2d 103 12 Lusietto v. King, 107 Ill. App. 2d 239, 246 N.E. 2d 24 13 McCormick v. Burt, 9S Hil. 263 ..............ccc0e, 12 Miils v. … Ed. 2d 24.
439 U.S. 876Amicus Brief — Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Rev. 572 (1974) 23-24 23 23 20 24 15 18, 14 23 Iu the Supreme Count of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1974 No. 74-124 BLUE CHIP STAMPS, ET AL., PETITIONERS Vv. MANOR DRUG STORES, ETC. … Roto American Corp., 339 F.2d 24 (C.A. 2).
421 U.S. 723Amicus Curiae Brief — Gulf States Util. Co. v. FPC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Federal Power Commission, 399 F. 2d 953, 959 (C.A. D.C.). … United States, supra. 24 Il.
411 U.S. 747Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert denied sub nom., Taylor v. … Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.). cert dented sub. nom., Taylor v.
505 U.S. 1003Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; Miscellaneous Technical Amendments
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 1, 2001
§ 366.5 [Amended] 24. … PART 399—EMPLOYEE SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS 131. Revise the authority citation for part 399 to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502; and 49 CFR 1.73. 132.
66 FR 49867Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationRespondents Brief — United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1965
and Opinion No. 399°? without a “monstrosity” resulting. … This lack of notice and hearing alone is sufficient to vitiate the Commission’s sua sponte imposition of a price in- crease moratorium. 24 Instead, the Commission argues that ODECO did not properly
382 U.S. 223Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clarence F. Stephenson, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 11, 2024
New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-24 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 100.
Amicus Curiae Brief — James Skinner, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 25, 2025
Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) .......................... 18 Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449 (2009) ....................................... 10 Connick v. … See Pet.App.24. This Court’s intervention is paramount. 6 The non-unanimous nature of Mr. Skinner’s conviction further taints this case. Louisiana adopted non-unanimous convictions “to 6 15 IV.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hall v. Thaler
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
App. 2007) .............. 24 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).......... ERR en eesmrey WE i Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312 (1993)................ meee ree Ma lV Hill v. … W200501334CCAR3PD, 2006 WL 3327828, at *23-24 (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 9, 2006).
562 U.S. 981Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Dwayne Smith, Petitioner v. Amy Robey, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 3, 2024
Commonwealth, 366 S.W.3d 399 (Ky. 2012) (hereinafter “Smith I"). … Jan. 24, 2020).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 25, 2018
Chen’s simulations: See Chart, Appendix H, A-24. Id. Even though the court relied heavily on Dr. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 419 (2006) (plurality op.) (“there is no constitutional requirement of proportional representation . . . .”); City of Mobile v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tiger Mynarcik, Petitioner v. WV 23 Jumpstart, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 23, 2023
Frey 123 Nev. 399 (2007) ............................................ 24 Milwaukee Cnty. v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935) ............................................. 21 Office Depot, Inc. v. … App. 19a-20a. 1 24 within six years or be deemed void. Leven v. Frey (2007) 123 Nev. 399, 409-10. The original judgment creditors failed to renew the Original Nevada Judgment. App. 4a.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Oct 7, 2024
Id. at 391, 399; see also 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(IV). … Endrew F., 580 U.S. at 399.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 26, 2026
Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854) ................................................ 19 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Cont.) Page State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144, 4 Dev. & Bat. (Orig. … Immigrant 24 status is not one of the exceptions to birthright citizenship and was never meant to be one of them.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2026
I-38, 334 F.3d 928, 932-34 (10th Cir. 2003). ........................................ 24 Chapman v. … Sys., 125 F.4th 527 (4th Cir. 2025) ................................................ 24 DeJohn v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.