Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.74s
Amicus Brief — Segura v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
FABRICANT Counsel for Respondent Dickstein & Fabricant GENE REIBMAN 24 East 21st Street New York, New York 10010 (212) 505-0050 600 N.E. Third Avenue Ft. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1969, Re ne en ee ne 7 Wong Sun v.
468 U.S. 796Amicus Brief — Rakas v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1979
Rev. 665 (1970)............ 9, 10 Plumb, Jllegal Enforcement of the Law, 24 Cornell L. Q. … Rev. 665 (1970); Plumb, //legal Enforcement of the Law, 24 Cornell L. Q. 337 (1939); Schaefer, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Sanctity of the Person, 64 Nw. U. L.
439 U.S. 128Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Woodford, Warden v. Rohan Ex Rel. Gates
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) 13,14 Furman v. … A at 24.
540 U.S. 1069Jurisdictional Statement — Committee for Public Ed. & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1973
Essex, 342 F.Supp. 399 (S.D. … Supp. 399 (8.D.
413 U.S. 756Brief Amicus Curiae — Loving v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1967
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399. (1923)....... Miller v. Lucks, 203 Miss. 824, 36 So. 2d 140. (1948) Naim v. … E. 24 849, app. dismissed, 350 U. S. 985 (1956). | : * Perez v.- Sharpe, 32 Cal. 2d 711, 198 P. 2d 17 (1948). ™ Bridges v.
388 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 5, 2024
Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) 15 In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133 (1955) 16 Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. PUC, 301 U.S. 292 (1937) 16 Old Wayne Mutual Life Ass’n of Indianapolis v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923); Pierce v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — GenBioPro, Inc., Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 7, 2026
South Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 399-3022 heather@hackerstephens.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities..................................................... … South Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 (512) 399-3022 heather@hackerstephens.com Counsel for Amicus Curiae Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America May 2026 15
Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Grindlay's Bank (Uganda), Ltd. v. J. Zeevi & Sons, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1975
By Pee ee: ye ere hy on eae 24, 25 TABLE OF CASES AND AUTHORITIES PAGE Mertz v. Mertz, 271 N.Y. 466 (1936) ............... 24 North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc., No. … On or about March 24, 1972, Hiram Zeevi and Co.
423 U.S. 866Opposition — Houston Distribution Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
A-9; Tr. 398-399, 555, 604, 614-615). Thus, the workforce at the end of the first week of February numbered eighteen employees. … A-23 to A-24.) 4At the Board hearing, petitioners moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the charge and complaint named only HDS and that the alleged unfair labor practices related solely
439 U.S. 1047Opinion — United States v. Southern Pacific R. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1912
the same act and forfeited under the act of July 6, 1886, c. 637, 24 Stat. 123. Southern Pacific Railroad Company v. United States, 168 U.S. 1, distinguished. … Kindred, 4 Wall. 399, 404.
223 U.S. 565Appendix — MacKethan v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
National Broad- App. 6 casting Co., 217 F. 2d 399 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 954 (1955), rehearing denied, 349 U.S. 917 (1955). See also, Kriesel v. … United States District Judge Date: JUL 24 1974
422 U.S. 1045Statement Opposing Jurisdiction — United States v. Borden Co.
Supreme Court brief · Statement Opposing Jurisdiction · 1939
Stat. 31), as amenged August 24, 1935 (49 Stat. _ 150) and as reenacted and amended by the Agricul- oo Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (50 Stat. _ a ey eh ce ig te Ak ep isunc 4 Sheets . … Keitel, 211 U.S, 370, 399), and is’ ‘‘an innovation in criminal jurisdic- — tion in certain classes of.- prosecations, it cannot be extended - beyond its terms’’ (United States v.
308 U.S. 188Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Charles Deon Ladd, Petitioner v. Oklahoma
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 26, 2022
A representative of the Cherokee Nation Citizenship Office would testify that Petitioner was a citizen of the Cherokee Nation on the date of the offense on October 24, 2009. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), that a reservation’s boundaries had been diminished, to vacate convictions that were made final prior to that decision. See Cuch, 79 F.3d at 989-90.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bernstein v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1942
At the foot of that couch there was a small closet and from the closet we removed articles consist- ing of two of the last exhibits, 24 and 25 for iden- tification.” … 96, 98, 100, 103, 105, 106, 108, 109, 112, 114, 115, 122, 128, 129, 135, 137, 144, 145, 147, 149, 151, 156, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163, 185, 186, 189, 318, 344, 370, 372, 380, 381, 382, 387, 388, 392, 399
315 U.S. 811Petitioners Brief — Franklin Life Insurance v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1941
R. 7, par. 10) that certain of the deposits here were made after registration had been dis- continued; therefore they clearly were compulsory under Sec. 250 of the Act of June 29, 1937 (Appen., p. 24 … Trust & Savings Bank, 101 Fed. (2d) 399, the deposits and withdrawals here involved would come within this category. 7.
313 U.S. 580Reply Brief — William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al., Applicants v. Wesley Ira Purkey
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jul 15, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), allowing them to bring suit in a forum of their choosing far from the district of their confinement. … See also Stay Appl. 24-26. Respondent’s pro se filings confirm this. The facts of Panetti v.
Amicus Brief — Pioneer Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
L. 399 (1981) eeeeeetceeee “-iii- 21 23 23 20 29 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1981 NO. 81-2162 PIONEER FINISHING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, Vv. … Bureau of Labor Statistics, Characteristics of Major Collective -24- from or modifying the provisions of the contract.
460 U.S. 1080Amicus Brief — Kalaris v. Donovan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1983
Id. at 399, “The removed members have not raised and could not raise due process allegations here because they cannot be subject to potential unfairness in adjudication the process protects against.” … USS. , 103 S.Ct. 634 (1983). 24. Id., at 640, n.11. 11 tive squabble among officers of the same cabinet de- partment.
462 U.S. 1119Respondents Brief — Schram v. Dade County
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1984
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S.Ct. 1893, 26 L.Ed.2d 446. If, however, there is discretionary review by a higher state court, the exercise of such discretion must be sought in the state courts. … Supreme Court of the United States or a United States Court of Appeals that are determinative of the cause of action and for which there is no controlling precedent of the Supreme Court of Florida.’ 24
469 U.S. 834Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966)... 10 HealtnAmerica et al. v. Menton, 551 So.2d 235 I III cid crinsscscacirestenenccnteieanchealaLelalen aii eta 7 Lake Shore & S.M. Ry. Co. v. … L.Rev. 123, 123-24 (1982): Owen, Punitive Damages in Prod- ucts Liability Litigation, 74 Mich.L.Rev. 1257, 1299-1301 (1976) ; Comment, Corporate Vicarious Liability for Pu- nitive Damages, 1985 B.Y.U.L.Rev
499 U.S. 1
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.