Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,113 results
0.18s
Opposition Brief — Applied Companies Companies v. Geren (No. 06-817)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006
Pet. 7 (quoting El Paso Natural Gas, 526 U.S. at 481-482). … Express, 256 U.S. at 435).
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., 423 U.S. 326, 331 (1976) (quoting Camp v. … FPC, 423 U.S. at 334; Camp, 411 US. at 142. The case at hand, by contrast, simply involves consideration by the court of appeals of declarations admitted into evidence by the district court. Pet.
Opposition Brief — Virginia v. Kingdom of Spain
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
App. 218-19; 423-24). Most of those on board La Galga reached land and the wreck remained accessible for a month or more. … App. 417-22; 423-30).
531 U.S. 1144Opposition Brief — Rendish v. City of Tacoma
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983); Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661 (1994); Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 9 (1987); Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968). … Smith, 472 U.S. 479, 482 (1985). The Ninth Circuit recognized this source. Rendish v. City of Tacoma, 123 F.3d at 1221.
524 U.S. 952Opposition Brief — Tillman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1956
\N > ted Ntates certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 967 Long Island R (« Shutt v. … Group of Investors, 335 U.S. 211, 214. 2. While the foregoing considerations are disposi- tive of the case, both courts below were in agree- ment that 33 U.S.
352 U.S. 842Opposition Brief — New Mexico v. Forbes (No. 05-644)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2005
Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 301 (1989). … Allen, 344 U.S. [443], $34, 73 $.Ct. 397, 423, 97 L.Ed. 469 [ (1953) | Jackson, J., concurring in result) (state courts cannot ‘anticipate, and so comply with, this Court's due process requirements
Opposition Brief — John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of the United Food & Commercial Workers
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
(Id. at 423-24 (Stevens, J., dissenting) .] … Reis, 451 U.S. 401, 416-17 n.18 (1981).
481 U.S. 1014Opposition Brief — Stone v. North Carolina Department of Labor
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Id. at 482. … Muniz, 374 U.S. 150 (1963).
525 U.S. 1016Opposition Brief — Arnoldt v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229 (1989). … Ohio, 482 U.S. 161, 169 n. 7 (1977) (Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecution “where the State is unable to proceed on the more serious charge at the outset because the additional
503 U.S. 983Opposition Brief — Ali Awad Mahmoud Irsan, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 22, 2025
Ford, 498 U.S. at 423. (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 99 n.24). … Batson, 476 U.S. at 93 (citing Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545, 550 (1967); Terrance v. Florida, 188 U.S. 519 (1903)).
Opposition Brief — Elliott v. United Center
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998
Hyde, 466 U.S. … /d. at 482.
523 U.S. 1021Opposition Brief — Village of Airmont v. LeBlanc-Sternberg
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (4990) ........... Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) ................. Constitution, statutes and rule: U.S. Const. Amend. … First Assembly of God, 20 F.3d at 423. Both Grosz and First Assembly of God involved enactments of general ap- plicability not motivated by hostility toward religion.
518 U.S. 1017Opposition Brief — Maine Community Health Options, et al., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 9, 2021
Burwell, 576 U.S. 473, 482 (2015). … King, 576 U.S. at 482. “Individuals who meet the Act’s requirements may purchase insurance with the tax credits, which are provided in advance directly to the individual’s insurer.”
Opposition Brief — Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Chadha, 462 U.S. at 931-932; Buckley, 424 U.S. at 108.’ 2. … Smith, 659 F.2d 476, 481-482 (Sth Cir. 1981)).
480 U.S. 678Opposition Brief — Safir v. Blackwell
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Cl. 795, 482 F.2d 832 (1970); Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Connor, 418 F.2d 1142 (D.C. Cir. 1969); Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 184 Ct. … Volpe, 401 U.S. 402 (1970).
414 U.S. 975Opposition Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988
Greenleaf, 117 U.S. 554, 559 (1886); White v. Dunbar, 119 U.S. 47, 51-52 (1886); McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U.S. 419, 423-24 (1891); Cimiotti Unhair- ing Co. v. … denied, 469 U.S. 821 (1984).
488 U.S. 986Opposition Brief — Block v. Meese
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Mendoza, 464 U.S. 154 .................. 10 Washington Vv. Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658.. 18 Constitution, statute, regulation and rule: U.S. … Fishing Vessel Ass’n, 443 U.S. 658, 671-674 (1979) ; Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 422-423 & n.3, 428-430 (1960). W ov. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFice; 1986 491507 20243
478 U.S. 1021Opposition Brief — Gavin Yepa, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 29, 2018
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 482-486 & n.9 (1981). these purposes, is limited to express Interrogation, for questioning or its “functional equivalent,” namely, “words or actions on the part of the police … Muniz, 496 U.S. at 605.
Opposition Brief — First Bank v. DJL Properties, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
Aura City, 73 U.S. 139 (1867 ’ i<cd STATUTES AND REGULATIONS 12 U.S.C (sy , Z8 U.S. (] 28 U.S. 1254(] 23 U.s.0. 9144] he eet 144] 28 U.S.A LAt rs | 14 6 LAA LEGISLATIVE MATERIAI JURISDICTION … Gonzales, 400 F.8d 482, 484-85 (7th Cir.2005).
562 U.S. 1003Opposition Brief — HK Systems, Inc. v. Eaton Corp (No. 08-1488)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
Otis Erecting Co., 322 N.W.2d 482 (Wis. Ct. App. 1982) ....... 30 Indiana Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. … Otis Erecting Co., 322 N.W.2d 482, 486 (Wis. Ct.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.