Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.08s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Obergefell v. Hodges
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
See id. at 399. … DeBoer, 772 F.3d at 399.
576 U.S. 644Opposition Brief — Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
/d. at 399. The government also inspected the labeling of the containers and compelled the manufacturer to deliver Agent Orange to it under threat of criminal sanctions. /d. at 399-400. … See Pet. at 24-25. The court did no such thing.
551 U.S. 142Appellants Reply Brief — Township of Midland v. Michigan State Boundary Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1978
Virginia, 6 Wheat 264, 399, 5 L ed. 257, 290, in respect of certain general expressions in the opinion in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 187, 2 L ed. 60. … Supp. 1397, 399 U.S. 901, 400 U.S. 855 (1970), page 29 Novi Brief.
435 U.S. 1004Federal Register · Rule · Jul 24, 2007
EPA , 399 F.3d 486 (2nd Cir. 2005) (hereinafter Waterkeeper ). … This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2) and will be effective on July 24, 2007.
72 FR 40245Environmental Protection AgencyOpposition Brief — Hamilton v. City of Romulus
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2011
Pellullo, 399 F.3 197, 222 (3d Cir. 2005) cert den. 546 U.S. 1137; 126 Ct. 1141; 163 L. … Record 333, Memo/Order 7, pp 16-17, 24, 26; Record 335, Memo/Order, p 4 iting Record 201-5, Hamilton 12/11/06 dep, pp 39 196: Record 335.
563 U.S. 1021Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .................................................. 4, 7 Cox Commc’ns, Inc. v. Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. (U.S. … Sony Music Ent., No. 24-171, slip op. at 7 (U.S.
Opposition Brief — Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1990
Preambles {| 30,419 | FN EE ee eee eee ON 4,6 | Order No. 399-A, Refunds Resulting From Btu Measurement Adjustments, FERC Stats. & Regs., Regs. … See, e.g., Consolidated Gas Supply Corp., 24 FERC § 61,271 (1983). 11 [section 4] and defining its authority to modify them [sec- tion 5].” Pet. App. 52a.
498 U.S. 907Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Travis Miles, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 21, 2020
Ct. 399 (2018) ............................................ 5, 11 Appellate Court Cases: Brumbach v. United States, 929 F.3d 791 (6th Cir. 2019) ............................. 5-6 Carter v. … Ct. 399 (2018), indicated that Tennessee aggravated burglary also qualified as a generic burglary under the ACCA. (Id.). Finding that reasonable jurists could not debate whether Mr.
Opposition Brief — Dico, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
Lowe, 118 F.3d 399, 401- 403 (5th Cir. 1997), and Ailantic Richfield Co. v. Ameri- can Airlines, Inc., 98 F.3d 564, 568 (10th Cir. 1996)). … [Section 101(24), 42 U.S.C. 9601(24) (emphasis added by the court)].
535 U.S. 1095Opposition Brief — Hill v. Jennings (No. 07-43)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007
Dist., 399 F.3d 1279 (11th I. ITUIII dace kde ccc anibebsdcdehomnbibsbticta acl ab boauastaaSalawicode 1] Texas v. Mead, 465 U.S. 1041 (1984) veccccccccsssecceseeeeree 7 United States v. … Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 588-5180 Counsel for Respondent August 24, 2007 * Counsel of Record
Opposition Brief — Westfall v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
.+4++5: Fa er cd sn dade S e's eos 40 beus SCP MENS 24 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Sup-CeR. 10....2cccccccccsvvcvcseseveevavsvesceeses 24 eS Se) eperere rrr errr rere ere eee err ere ] Sup.Ct.R. … Vol. 2, pp. 399-400, Plaintiff's Opposition To Defen- dant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Exhibit P).° On or about January 3, 1991, Mr.
510 U.S. 993Reply Brief — Stollings v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975
Res. 399—Pub. Res. 101) c. 586, 45 Stat. 1540, 1541 (2a) wees 16 ili PAGE The ED ssetiesicsnerniidiinicatpuih viciouiieianicbilaianbinimabiaciions 20 BU Ti eatin’ FA. … Resolution 399—Pub. Res.
419 U.S. 1121Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Safeway Stores, Inc. v. West
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1950
Company, 24 F. (2d) 671 Kramer v. Mills Lumber Company, 24 Fed. (2d) 313 Brown v. Dorney Park, 167 Fed. (2d) 453 In the case of Johnson v. United States, 333 U. … Ct. 399, and Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U. S. 233, 33 8. Ct. 416.
339 U.S. 952Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Johnson v. Kersh Lake Drainage District
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942
S. 399 ; Pa cet 20 : Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U. S. 64 scinacicacte aa Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham, 162 U. S. 339.......--_-__...._ 20 : Grubb v. … Patterson, 263 U. 8. 399, 402; Seagraves v. Wal- lace, 69 F. 2d 163, 164, 165.
316 U.S. 673Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1943
City of Boston, 142 Mass. 24 (6 N. E. 840); Minns v. Billing, 183 Mass. 126 (66 N. E. 593, 5 DL. R. A. N. … S. 399, p. 415), but at the same time as the respondent’s claim was heard, and at the time set on their own petition for a hearing of their case.
320 U.S. 758Petition — First National Bank & Trust Co. in Alton v. Berke
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
App. 2d 399, 158 N.E. 2d 103 12 Lusietto v. King, 107 Ill. App. 2d 239, 246 N.E. 2d 24 13 McCormick v. Burt, 9S Hil. 263 ..............ccc0e, 12 Miils v. … Ed. 2d 24.
439 U.S. 876Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1981), cert denied sub nom., Taylor v. … Estuary Properties, Inc., 399 So.2d 1374 (Fla.). cert dented sub. nom., Taylor v.
505 U.S. 1003Motor Carrier Safety Regulations; Miscellaneous Technical Amendments
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 1, 2001
§ 366.5 [Amended] 24. … PART 399—EMPLOYEE SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS 131. Revise the authority citation for part 399 to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502; and 49 CFR 1.73. 132.
66 FR 49867Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationRespondents Brief — United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1965
and Opinion No. 399°? without a “monstrosity” resulting. … This lack of notice and hearing alone is sufficient to vitiate the Commission’s sua sponte imposition of a price in- crease moratorium. 24 Instead, the Commission argues that ODECO did not properly
382 U.S. 223Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Clarence F. Stephenson, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 11, 2024
New York, 399 U.S. 117, 122-24 (1970) (citation omitted) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 100.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.