Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1293)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
One commentator! … The commentator is now the Honorable Kimberly Moore of the Federal Circuit. 38 Other parts of Section 2(a) also make this point clear.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 20, 2026
City of NY, 295 U.S. 264 (1935) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9, 10 Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. … “is upon the time of the [defendant’s] acts, not [when] the consequences of the acts become most painful”); Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Amgen Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Sanofi, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 3, 2023
Linde Air Prods. Co., 339 U.S. 605, 611 (1950). ARGUMENT I. … requirement that the 1836 Act 4 5 and was carried forward into the 1952 Patent Act as 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 (pre-AIA), now recodified as § 112(a) (AIA).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bucklew v. Precythe, 139 S. Ct. 306 (2018) (No. 17-8151)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
He commented that after an execution, “I was in the shower two hours later, scrubbing and scrubbing. Then I showered again. … I just couldn’t get the sweat and grime off me to the point where I felt clean enough to go to sleep.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 23, 2018
He commented that after an execution, “I was in the shower two hours later, scrubbing and scrubbing. Then I showered again. … I just couldn’t get the sweat and grime off me to the point where I felt clean enough to go to sleep.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Goldberg v. Kelly
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Cir. 1963), But that seg | tells us when, if ever, the Government may summarily seize a broadcasting license or an air traffic route. … gories of the Social Security Act (Titles I, X, XIV, and XVI).
397 U.S. 254Amicus Curiae Brief — Samson v. California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Assuming that no person is arrested for more than one index crime during any 3-year period at the 1986 rates, the general population rate would be about 3% for the period. … It is an “act of grace” from the state to the parolee. See Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490, 492 (1935) (probation); People v. Rodriguez, 51 Cal. 3d 427, 445, 19 795 P. 2d 783, 788 (1990).
547 U.S. 843Amicus Curiae Brief — Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 cee ea eh 6 South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 Sr SIR osc ne ee ee a 5 State v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96 n.14 (1983) (enjoining state law preempted by ERISA); Crosby v.
562 U.S. 1177Amicus Curiae Brief — TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2024
If TikTok were indeed a powerful weapon capable of undermining United States’ actions inimical to China’s interests, surely the period 2018 – 2024 would have been the time to use it. … Users and researchers will detect the suppression of content critical of China and this will trigger comment and criticism.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Van Orden v. Perry
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Masters, 236 A.2d 197, 200-201 (Pa. 1967) (“This Act of 1794 (Pennsylvania Sunday Closing Law) itself traces an ancestry back to the Ten Commandments fulminated from the smoking top of Mt. Sinai. … The Ten Commandments of Applied Econometrics, Kennedy, P.E., Journal of Economic Surveys Sep2002, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p569 21p The Missing Tablet: Comment on Peter Kennedy & the Ten Commandments, Magnus
545 U.S. 677Amicus Curiae Brief — Public Utilities Commission v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
This seemingly “clean parceling of responsibility” is complicated by that fact that “virtually all telephone plant that is used to provide intrastate service is also used to provide interstate service … Thus, while the PUC’s first decision affected rates during the period in which the Hawaiian Telephone Com- pany received transitional supplement payments from AT&T, the second decision (although based
485 U.S. 956Amicus Curiae Brief — Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), held that the landowners were entitled to compensation for the three year period. … Water Act Section 404 permits to fill wetlands, are, in effect, “temporary” restrictions on the use of land; and Endangered Species Act habitat restrictions may be “tem- porary” to the extent that
535 U.S. 302Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Thus, many of API's members are subject to suit under the Act. … Act’s “lenient standard.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 20, 2022
Aug. 22, 2019) (refusing to consider equitable tolling of section 5110(b) for a twenty-year Air Force veteran who explained that “he lacked competence” for several months of the one-year period); Ross … As Justice Scalia once memorably noted, solicitude toward veterans is “more like a fist than a thumb” on the scale, which, Justice Scalia commented, is “as it should be.”
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 17, 2025
To [these petitions were] attached interrogatories calling upon the employer to furnish specific information regarding each employee during the entire period of employment. … June 6, 2022) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
CIE GOOD vescsrecnnnevinecseeninmnnaien 8,15,22,23 Commercial Cleaning Servs., LLC v. Colin Serv. Sys., Inc., AF FOG SPO CRS GO, SESE) crccsivinvsinvinnnchidamna 5 Discon, Inc. v. … Zirkle Fruit Co., 301 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2002); Commercial Cleaning Servs., LLC v. Colin Serv. Sys., Inc., 271 F.3d 374 (2d Cir. 2001); Canyon County v. Svangenta Seeds, Inc., No.
547 U.S. 516Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 16, 2026
The number increases from ten drugs in the 2026 price period, to fifteen in the 2027 and 2028 periods, and twenty drugs for all subsequent periods. … The defendant, Kudra, cleaned furs that the plaintiff department store (Dunham) agreed to store for its customers during warmweather months.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jane Doe, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 30, 2020
by servicemembers acting “incident to the service.” … Nearly universally, courts and commentators agree that Feres was wrongly decided, for the reasons already explained.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jones v. Bock
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
See Porter, 534 U.S. at 528 (dominant concern of PLRA to, inter alia, “foster better prepared litigation of claims aired in court”). … The statute of limitations for section 1983 claims “is generally the applicable state-law period for personal-injury torts,” City of Rancho Palos Verdes v.
549 U.S. 199Amicus Curiae Brief — Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Haslip, 499 U.S. 1 (1991) ......... 6, 14-15, 29 In re Paris Air Crash, 622 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, re ee 22 Pierson v. … In re Paris Air Crash, 622 F.2d 1315, 1319-1320 (9th Cir.)
514 U.S. 52
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.