Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Advanced Lightweight Concrete Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Lunsford Plumbing, Heating & Air Condition- ing, Inc., 254 N.L.R.B. 1360 (1981), aff’d sub nom. Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 9 v. NLRB, 684 F.2d 1033 (D.C. … shall be provided for 90 days following termination” of the agreement was not “clear and unmistakable waiver” of the union’s right to bargain over the discontinuance of those benefits after the 90-day period
484 U.S. 539Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 15, 2024
Magna Carta art. 39 (cleaned up) (emphasis added). … John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, IX § 123 (1689) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — New Jersey v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
No court or commentator at the time of the Compact would have found "sovereignty" in a mere "right of property." … held in Miln that the states have "undeniable and unlimited jurisdiction" to “advance the safety, happiness, and prosperity of its people, and to provide for its general welfare, by any and every act
523 U.S. 767Amicus Curiae Brief — Gordon v. Lance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
In 1868 the ‘‘Township Aid Act’’ was passed requiring & two-thirds majority of the voters who voted at the election. … For years these judgments went unpaid; but all were ultimately refunded at a compromise figure by new bonds which were voted by the required two-thirds majority and matured serially over a 20-year period
403 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — 3M Company, et al., Petitioners v. George Amador
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2022
Co., 70 F.3d 968 (8th Cir. 1995) .................................. 9, 10 In re Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Prods. Liab. … Aug. 18, 2021) (quoting In re Bair Hugger Forced Air Warming Devices Prods. Liab.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Merck KGaA v. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
AIRE OER GED ccccccceccosececes passim FO OBE. | FR GRD cc ccccccccccccesenceses 24 5S UBL. © SES GRSGEP cccccccccccccccsccseces 23 35 UBL. … (“Hatch-Waxman Act” or “1984 Act”).’
545 U.S. 193Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Denmead, 56 U.S. (15 How.) „„ 4, 6, 7, 8, 11 Statutes: Patent Act of 1836, 5 Stat. 117, 119, 07 5 Patent Act of 1870, 16 Stat. 198, 201, § 26......... 5 bbb „0 5 bbb 5, 6 Other Sources: R. … Patent Act of 1836, 5 Stat. 117, 119, § 6.
520 U.S. 17Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2024
(cleaned up). B. … To wit, the Department of Justice has previously opined that the right to record police officers discharging their duties 16 in public “does not depend on individuals criticizing police, commenting on
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013
Developing countries emerging from periods of human-rights turmoil often seek reconciliation through nonjudicial means. … Air Lines v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 111 (1948).
569 U.S. 108Amicus Curiae Brief — Orff v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Id. § 311, comment g. … See Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 304 and 311, comment g.
545 U.S. 596Amicus Curiae Brief — Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
issue in this case.’ 1 See, e.g., Comments of James L. … Continental Air Lines v. Department of Transportation, 843 F.2d 1444, 1450-1451 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
501 U.S. 680Amicus Curiae Brief — Jerry Aldridge, et al., Petitioners v. Regions Bank
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 28, 2026
Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10 (Lord Sumption SCJ) (cleaned up)). But if it is so clear that surcharge is an equitable remedy, why is there confusion in the lower courts? … Commentators have recognized Amara’s course correction, e.g., Bray, Equity, Law, and the Seventh Amendment, supra, 100 Tex. L. Rev. at 490 n.120, 504–05, and so have some of the lower federal courts.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Christopher v. Harbury
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
App. 24a), that government officials can answer informational inquiries with a terse “no comment” and a rigid refusal to assist members of the public. … Department of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 360 (1976) (quoting S. Rep. No. 813, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. 3 (1965)).
536 U.S. 403Amicus Curiae Brief — Geraldine Tyler, Petitioner v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2023
The primary outlier during that period was Virginia’s 1790 statute, which authorized a tax collector to search the land of a delinquent taxpayer and sell any personal property. 1790 Va. Acts ch. … Other influential commentators agreed.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 31, 2024
It is “fundamental” that the Constitution “applies to acts of the [government], not to acts of private persons or entities.” Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830, 837–38 (1982). … See id. 13 United Airlines received $32,267,444, and American Air- lines received $25,855,237. See id. 14 In 2021, Archer Daniels Midland received $417,705,586.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 31, 2024
It is “fundamental” that the Constitution “applies to acts of the [government], not to acts of private persons or entities.” Rendell-Baker v. Kohn, 457 U.S. 830, 837–38 (1982). … See id. 13 United Airlines received $32,267,444, and American Air- lines received $25,855,237. See id. 14 In 2021, Archer Daniels Midland received $417,705,586.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Monsanto Company, Petitioner v. John L. Durnell
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2026
The federal government recently recognized this risk, designating glyphosate as critical to national defense under the Defense Production Act. Exec. … ASGA Comments, supra, at 3.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
The court concluded that the bank’s temporary freeze of re- spondent’s account during the period that the bank sought relief from the automatic stay was not a violation of the statute (Pet. … Air Atlanta, 74 B.R. 426, 427 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.), aff’d, 81 B.R. 724 (N.D. Ga. 1987); Williams v. American Bank of the Mid-Cities, 61 B.R. 567, 573-574 (Bankr. N.D.
516 U.S. 16Amicus Curiae Brief — Rothgery v. Gillespie County
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
A relative may move the furniture, a landlord may repaint the walls, or a neighbor might clean the kitchen. … P. art. 16.01 22 trial is a procedural means of forcing the State either to act on a case or dismiss it.
554 U.S. 191Amicus Curiae Brief — Elko County, Nevada v. Wilderness Society (No. 08-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Homestead Act of 1862 (12 Stat. 392) Mining Act of 1866, Section 8 (14 Stat. 251) Vill TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued Mining Act of 1866, Section 9 (14 Stat. 251) Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2409 … Such a conclusion is in accordance with this Court’s admonition that federal courts are not forums for airing generalized grievances. Warth v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.