Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Petitioners Reply Brief — Interstate Transit Lines v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1943
Ed. 399." … Excerpts from his brief in that case which illustrate that emphasis are set out below in the Appendix p. 24}. 2.
319 U.S. 590Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Georgia, 429 U.S. 122, 97 S.Ct. 399, 50 L.Ed.2d 399 (1976). … $10, 68 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.24 776 (1968).
462 U.S. 1144Brief for Respondent — Ricci v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1973
Blue Grass Stockyards Co., 399 F. 2d 868 (6th Cir., 1968) Denver Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 306 F. Supp. 289 (D. … , 1a 6d > 6e Se & 7 2, 13, 14, 24, 32, 3a 7a(1) 2, 13, 24, 6a 7a(2) 2, 7, 13, 14, 6a 7a(8) 2, 7, 14, 24, 6a 7a(9) sidbiekcacgcaiine 2, 14, 7a 7b 2, 32, Te 8 2, 12, 32, 8a Sa) ......
409 U.S. 289Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Scott E. Schmidt, Petitioner v. Brian Foster, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 19, 2019
(Doc. 12-9 at 23-24.) … (Doc. 24-1 at 11.)
Brief for the United States — United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1922
Bowery Sa Bank, 47 Hun. 399; 14 N. V. 8. 515; 84 N. V. 399; 4 L. R. … Bowery Savings Bank, 47 Hun 399; II N. F. S. 515; 54 NV. F. 399, 4 L. R. A. 145. Wheeler v. Dunn, 13 Colo. 428; 22 Pac. 827. Avila v. Manhattan Chemical Co., 32 Hun. 1. Holt Mfg. Co. v.
260 U.S. 290Amicus Brief — Jones v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1982
Krol, 68 N.J. 236, > 21 24 9, 10, ll, 12, 13, 16, 18, 22, 25 8, 9, ll, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 35 Vv PAGE United States v. Brown, 478 F. 24 606 (D.C. … This is consistent with the holdings of Krol, 68 N.J. at 257, 344 A. 2d at 300, and Fields, 77 N.J. at 299-300, 399 A. 24 at 583.) 11sce text of statute, App.
454 U.S. 1141Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
Swenson, 399 F.2d 40 (8th Cir. 1968) ................ 14 Bartkus v. Illinots, 359 U.S. 121 (1959) oe. passim Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969) .............. 11, 21, 23, 24, 26 Breed v. … In the Court of Appeals decision in Ashe, 399 F.2d 40 (8th Cir. 1968), Mr.
449 U.S. 1112Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 5, 2025
Court review to settle law. 24. … Stat. §119, Art. 1 §24 Fla. Const.. 32. Florida law gives Petitioner/Appellant a substantive right to the public records paid for and requested. See: Article 1 §24 Fla. Constitution; Fla.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Larry A. McGhee, Petitioner v. Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 13, 2018
CONSTITUTION 2-3 STATUTE 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 3-10 STATEMENT OF THE CASE 10-13 LEGAL ANALYSIS 13-24 argument i 1319 argument ii 19-23 argument iii. 23-24 CONCLUSION 24 RELIEF REQUESTED … shiiton, 541W36,69(24) .. EWSLn qitts V Dxy, 469 US 387, 396 (1965) ..........
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — L. E. Pauli Coffey, Petitioner v. South Carolina
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 7, 2021
ADDITIONALLY 24. … Levesque, 546 F 3d 78, 83-85 (1st Cir. 2008) pg. 18 399 US 235-236-37 (1970) pg. 28 Williams v. Illinois Wooden v. USA 20-5279 (filed Jul 24, 2020) pg. 26 Dodd Frank Act pg. 8, 12 Fed. R. Civ.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Thedrick Edwards, Petitioner v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 5, 2020
Florida, 399 US 78 (1970). … Id. at 24 (Gorsuch, J.)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 1, 2025
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .................................................................. 4, 5 Hutchinson v. State, No. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 409-10 (1986); see also U.S. CONST. amend. VIII.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robert Dwayne Smith, Petitioner v. Amy Robey, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 3, 2024
Commonwealth, 366 S.W.3d 399 (Ky. 2012) (hereinafter “Smith I"). … Jan. 24, 2020).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hall v. Thaler
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
App. 2007) .............. 24 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).......... ERR en eesmrey WE i Heller v. Doe, 509 U.S. 312 (1993)................ meee ree Ma lV Hill v. … W200501334CCAR3PD, 2006 WL 3327828, at *23-24 (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 9, 2006).
562 U.S. 981Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 25, 2018
Chen’s simulations: See Chart, Appendix H, A-24. Id. Even though the court relied heavily on Dr. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 419 (2006) (plurality op.) (“there is no constitutional requirement of proportional representation . . . .”); City of Mobile v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tiger Mynarcik, Petitioner v. WV 23 Jumpstart, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 23, 2023
Frey 123 Nev. 399 (2007) ............................................ 24 Milwaukee Cnty. v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268 (1935) ............................................. 21 Office Depot, Inc. v. … App. 19a-20a. 1 24 within six years or be deemed void. Leven v. Frey (2007) 123 Nev. 399, 409-10. The original judgment creditors failed to renew the Original Nevada Judgment. App. 4a.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Oct 7, 2024
Id. at 391, 399; see also 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(IV). … Endrew F., 580 U.S. at 399.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2026
I-38, 334 F.3d 928, 932-34 (10th Cir. 2003). ........................................ 24 Chapman v. … Sys., 125 F.4th 527 (4th Cir. 2025) ................................................ 24 DeJohn v.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 26, 2026
Hall, 4 Cal. 399 (1854) ................................................ 19 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Cont.) Page State v. Manuel, 20 N.C. 144, 4 Dev. & Bat. (Orig. … Immigrant 24 status is not one of the exceptions to birthright citizenship and was never meant to be one of them.
Reply Brief Petitioner — Dillard v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Co.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief Petitioner · 1962
. | 220, 24 S. … Sec. 24-3501 (Pocket: Parts).
371 U.S. 902
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.