Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.18s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 30, 2006
EPA , 399 F.3d at 510. … EPA, 399 F.3d at 524.
71 FR 37744Environmental Protection AgencyPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Concourse Nursing Home v. Perales
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
New York State Department of Health, 184 A.D.2d 399, 585 N.Y.S.2d 355 [eee ee OE 2) a eee re a 17, 23, 24 Maine v. … Constitution. .....-.-- 24 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a) (1988) ...--- 22 seer eee 2 Pasa Fade @ sR aNSP as array oe em A, Me ee gt 24 SI USE ST oa oe et os es 18 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a(4A .-- 2-2 ee ee ees 18
519 U.S. 863Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Rust Brief at 24 n.39. The only support cited from the cases of this Court is footnote 8 in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S. … See gen- erally authorities cited in AAPS Amicus Brief, Section IV. 24 comes in the context of the post-conception transitional referral.
500 U.S. 173Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 404 (1966), where this Court referred to the term “reprehens- ible conduct” as “loose and unlimiting.” … /Pg. 24/25/27 24/33/22 24/52/19 24/43/18 24/28/2 25/8/12 24/51/13 25/2/19 24/17/3 24/20/6 24/48/16 24/8/3 24/17/4 24/26/40 24
499 U.S. 1Appellees Brief — Askew v. Hargrave
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1971
pp. 24-95 29-30. a a Williams v. Alinois, 399 US. 2%, 242 ( Wi). ; / “~e 3 pom ‘ electoral standard. Voter qualifications have no. … Ilinois, 399-U.S.- 235, 244 (1970) (** [There —.
401 U.S. 476Amicus Curiae Brief — Forney v. Apfel
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Thomas & Betts Co., EES Se 24, 25 Farr v. Gruber, 950 F.2d 399 (7th Cir. 1991)... 12 Faucher v. … App. 24.
524 U.S. 266Respondents Brief — Air Line Pilots v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1998
(See id. at 22 n.10, 24. … (ALPA’s Br. at 24.)
523 U.S. 866Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 25, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
CP96–399–002 on January 6, 2006, pursuant to sections 7 (c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission’s Regulations, an application to amend its certificate of public convenience and … E6–837 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Magalie R. Salas, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–832 Filed 1–24–06; 8:45 am] Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionOpposition Brief — Darby v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Deisart, 267 U.S. 540, 45 S.Ct. 399, 69 L.Ed. 79S CDOS). cocks canes cscackenmite ae 18 STATUTES CITED: 2 SC. 6 SD) 3 a ee 3 $3 Us, 0.00 oc cemsas cs ae eee 4 $3: USC. § S0Me)i ici .uss caret ae 4,5 … Deisart, 267 U.S. 540, 541, 45 S.Ct. 399, 400, 69 L.Ed. 775 (1925) (upholding similar state limitation).
529 U.S. 1065Brief for Appellant — RICHARD JOYCE SMITH, etc. v. U.S. (Nos. 74-166, 74-165, 74-167, 74-168)
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Appellant · 1974
U.S. 399 (1970). … The Stipulation as to Factual Matters is pointed at JA 317-24.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ton Ton Aquino, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 18, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit No. 24-10330 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. … Aquino, No. 24-10330, 2024 WL 5155129, at *12 (11th Cir. Dec. 18, 2024). (App.10a).
Reply Brief — Ongkaruck Sripetch, Petitioner v. Securities and Exchange Commission
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 10, 2026
Br. 24. Nor does the government dispute that the 2021 amendments in fact filled that gap. … Br. 24 (citing 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(g)(3)(A)(i)).
Respondents Brief — Ramdass v. Angelone
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2000
(JA 399-400). … (JA 399-400).
530 U.S. 156Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bates Industries, Inc. v. Daytona Sports Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1971
Co., 208 F.2d 1 ........ 9 Aufhauser, Application of, 399 F.2d 275 .......... 14, 23 Bates Industries, Inc. v. … John Deere Co., supra, 383 U.S. at 386, 15 L.ed.2d at 566, 86 S.Ct. 684; Application of Aufhauser, supra, 399 F.2d 275, 277 (C.C.P.A. 1968). 7 “ . 6.
404 U.S. 991Petitioners Brief — Greer v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1987
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) (evidence ob- tained in violation of Fourth Amendment); Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel at preliminary hearing). … Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24.
483 U.S. 756Petitioners Brief — Rosario v. Rockefeller
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973
A motion for a rehearing in banc was made on Monday, April 10, 1972 and was denied on April 24, 1972. The petition for certiorari herein was docketed on April 24, 1972. … NJ., May 24, 1972).
410 U.S. 752CLP Hartford Sales, L.L.C., et al. Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 25, 1995
ER95-399-000] Take notice that on January 9, 1995, The Washington Water Power Company (WWP), tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to 18 CFR 35.13, a new unsigned … [FR Doc. 95-1830 Filed 1-24-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
60 FR 4905Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionMemorandum — Texeira v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974
This operation involved first diluting heroin and then putting five dollars worth of the mixture in an individual bag (Tr. 20-23, 27, 37-38, 235-238, 398- 399). … Ramirez and others also acted as couriers for petitioners on several occasions, taking “bagged up” heroin from New York City to New Orleans, Louis- iana (Tr. 24-26, 27-31, 33-34, 238-241). 1.
419 U.S. 825Reply Brief — Bell v. Thompson
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2005
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), and (3) the threshold requirements for an eviden- tiary hearing under 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(2) are inapplicable to his case. … (Brief in Opposition, pp. 23-24) Thompson’s Ford claim was ripe for review by the state and federal courts only because of his imminent execution date.
545 U.S. 794Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — United States v. John Barth Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1929
CR. 24, 25, 29.) SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS TO BE URGED The Cirenit Court of Appeals erred : 1. … Maryland Casualty Company, No, 399, October Term, 1928, and it is desirable to save the rights of the United States in the present case pending the decision of the case so certified.
279 U.S. 370
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.