Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.13s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 16, 2024
Nixon, 433 U.S. at 475–76; 482–83. The House Bill identified “national security” as its purpose, H.R. 7521, but this alone cannot mean it is not a bill of attainder. … Nixon, 433 U.S. at 482.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
Rptr. 482, 598 P.2d 425 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 912 (1980) 9 Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982) 19 Flanigan v. … Rptr. 482, 598 P.2d 452 (1979), appeal dismissed, 455 U.S. 912 (1980) (jury award of $5 million in punitive damages against insurer for failure to conduct proper in- vestigation of its insured’s claim
486 U.S. 71Amicus Curiae Brief — PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC, Petitioner v. New Jersey, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2021
J.A. 419-423. … See J.A. 419-423. 3.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 326 (2016) (No. 16-348)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437 (1987)............ si tn Lp Perillee NOt ae, lv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 135 S. … Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 442 (1987); Tennes- see Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153, 189 (1978); United States v. Borden Co., 308 U.S. 188, 198 (1939).
Amicus Curiae Brief — St. Bernard Parish, et al., Petitioners v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 19, 2018
Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Goose Creek Hunting Club, Inc. v. United States, 518 F.2d 579 (Ct. … Los Angeles County, 482 U.S. 304, 316 (1987) (“While the typical taking occurs when the government acts to condemn property in the exercise of its power of eminent domain, the entire doctrine of inverse
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sylvia Gonzalez, Petitioner v. Edward Trevino, II, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 18, 2023
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) ..............................................11 iii Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574 (1998) ..........................................3, 20 D.C. v. Wesby, 138 S. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987). 6. Under a correct reading of Nieves, this Court should vacate the Fifth Circuit’s judgment in this case. Here, Ms.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
California, 283 U.S. 423 (1981) .....-ccccccccceesereee 29 Arkansas La. Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571 (1981)............ 29 Bates v. … California, 283 U.S. 423, 451 (1931) (“The United States may perform its functions without conforming to the police regula- tions of a state.”); Helfrich, 804 F.3d at 1100 n.7 (col- lecting cases).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Zubik v. Burwell, 136 S. Ct. 444 (2015) (No. 14-1418)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 I aiken aint tata tinrat ines dined 22 Perez v. Paragon Contractors Corp., No. 2:13- CV-281 RJS, 2013 WL 4478070 (D. … Estate of Shabazz, 23 482 U.S. 342 (1987). Instead, the Court lectured prison authorities on how long a beard must be to form a security threat. Hobbs, 135 S. Ct. at 866.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)........ 20 Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 aa SU CMU ciceichinicheciehinelientapheiment deh elas 14 Philadelphia v. … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 439 (1990) (plurality) (“Congress has the power to confer immunity from state regulation on Government suppliers beyond that conferred by the Constitution alone, even when
543 U.S. 954Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2024
Rev. 349, 423 (2023). Presidents take a different oath prescribed by Article II. See U.S. Const. art. II, §1; see also Am. Commc’ns Ass’n, C.I.O. v. … U.S. Const. art. VI. Presidents do not take the Article VI Oath. See Tillman & Blackman, supra, at 423.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Granholm v. Heald
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)........ 20 Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 re PI sccvereeesoscoeritsitenniiniiniiieaeididainiiaaiabiaatariinaiieaes 14 Philadelphia v. … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 439 (1990) (plurality) (“Congress has the power to confer immunity from state regulation on Government suppliers beyond that conferred by the Constitution alone, even when
544 U.S. 460Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 5, 2024
Jeff D., 475 U.S. 717 (1986) ........................................... 17, 18 Hewitt v. Helms, 482 U.S. 755 (1987) .................................................23 Higher Taste, Inc. v. … Helms, 482 U.S. 755, 760 (1987) (“Respect for ordinary language requires that a plaintiff receive at least some relief on the merits of his claim before he can be said to prevail.”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — William Trevor Case, Petitioner v. Montana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 6, 2025
Heckenkamp, 482 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2007) ................................ 24 United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024) ................................................ 12 United States v. … Pol’y 355, 356 (2005). 24 482 F.3d 1142, 1148 (9th Cir. 2007). And once the government has access, it may easily access everything stored on a given device. 2.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zackey Rahimi
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2023
United States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976) ................................... 18 Bradley v. State, 1 Miss. 156 (1824) ..................................... 5, 6 Cheff v. … United States, 423 U.S. 212, 220 (1976).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Calhoun
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
REV. 423 (1994) ............eeeeeee Conventions 28 U.S.T. 3459, 1050 U.N.T.S. 16, amended by T.LA.S. No. 10672, 1143 U.N.T.S. 346..... … REV. 423 (1994). Until Calhoun, the Court of Appeals also seemed to be in agree- ment with application of general maritime law to recre- ational boaters. See Sinclair v.
516 U.S. 199Amicus Curiae Brief — Beck v. Prupis
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Turkette, 452 U.S. 576 CODE D ovcecermesanitsasiciinneupmnenboubsevécndteisiesomaceassonsite passim United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) «0... 11 Van Horn v. Van Horn, 28 A. 669 (N.J. … Wells, 519 U.S. 482, 495 (1997).
529 U.S. 494Amicus Curiae Brief — Sullivan v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Ct. at 482 n.4. … Texas, 486 U.S. 249, 258 (1988).
508 U.S. 275Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987). … Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987), or ‘im- pliedly, by creating a comprehensive enforcement scheme that is incompatible with individual enforce- ment under § 1983
544 U.S. 113Amicus Curiae Brief — New Jersey v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Evans, 316 U.S. 159 (1942) 8 Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960) 5, 6 Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 U.S. 161 (1907) 4,5 — 2 Illinois v. Assoc. … Missouri, 342 U.S. 421, 423 (1952). The states must have vast leeway in the management of [their] internal affairs.“ Sailors v. Board of Education of County of Kent, 387 U.S. 105, 109 (1967).
419 U.S. 1080Amicus Curiae Brief — Luis A. Nieves, et al., Petitioners v. Russell P. Bartlett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 9, 2018
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) .............................................. 17 Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965) .............................................. 16 Crawford-El v. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 465 (1987) (“we have repeatedly invalidated laws that provide the police with unfettered discretion to arrest individuals for words or conduct that annoy or offend them"); Kolender
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.