Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Appellants Brief — Taylor v. Louisiana
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1975
Res. 61 Before the Subcomm. on Constitutional Amend- ments of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, Sist Cong., 24 Ses. 7 25:27 0190) aed x oss eas 10 Women’s Bureau, U.S. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 100 (1970) and Carter y. Jury Commission, 396 U.S. 320 (1970).
419 U.S. 522Reply Brief — United Water Conservation District, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 11, 2026
United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) ............................................ 4, 5 Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v. … Water Code § 102); see Pet. 24.
Reply Brief — Michael Barreto, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 24, 2026
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ...................................................................................................................5 Kingdomware Techs., Inc. v. … Dated: February 24, 2026 Respectfully submitted, BALLARD SPAHR LLP By: /s/ Michael P. Robotti Michael P.
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 5, 2015
The on-line Federal document management system is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. The docket number is listed at the beginning of this notice. … , subject to the following terms and conditions: (1) The driver and carrier must comply with all other applicable provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) (49 CFR parts 350-399
80 FR 60220Transportation DepartmentFederal Motor Carrier Safety AdministrationFinal Flood Elevation Determinations
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 5, 2004
Hutchins Creek: Just downstream of Langdon Drive *399 FEMA Docket No. P7641 Dallas County, Texas (Unincorporated Areas). … Dated: March 24, 2004. Anthony S. Lowe, Mitigation Division Director, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate. [FR Doc. 04-7598 Filed 4-2-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
69 FR 17606Homeland Security DepartmentFederal Emergency Management AgencyMemorandum — Toliver v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1974
black bag and several 'We are lodging with the Clerk of the Court the two-volume trans- cript of trial (“Tr.”) and the one-volume transcript of the pre-trial hearing (“H.”). 3 cartons in his car (H. 24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42; Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160; Carroll vy. Uni- j ted States, 267 U.S. 132; see United States v. Summer- ville, 477 F.2d 393 (C.A. 5).
419 U.S. 1056Opinion — United States v. Oppenheimer
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1916
Keitel, 211 U.S. 370, 399, had reference only to the construction of the indictment and to its sufficiency upon matters not involving a statute, in cases brought up by the United States under the earlier … Miles, 24 Q. B. D. 423, 431. The finality of a previous adjudication as to the matters determined by it, is the ground of decision in Commonwealth v.
242 U.S. 85Petition for Rehearing — Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Borrero (No. 324)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1961
McCarthy, 105 Utah 399, 142 P. 2d 649, and Moore v. Den- ver € R.G. W. R. Co., 4 Utah 2d 255, 292 P. 2d 849, 852, dis- approving such an instruction, and to Ellis v. Union Pacific R. … A. 3), 290 F. 24 296, cited at p. 17 of the petition.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Freedman v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
The opinion of the Dis- trict Court for the District of New Jersey is reported at 399 F. Supp. 668 (D. N. … Scornavocco’s Restaurant, Inc., No. 75-1483 (7 Cir., Dec. 24, 1975) (corporation ).
425 U.S. 992Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
D. 399-400 (1908). … The discretionary nature of the Carey Act was discussed in State of Wyoming, 36 L.D. 399, 399-400 (1908), as follows: It is clear from the terms of the act of August 18, 1894, supra, under which the
445 U.S. 715Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Masonite Corp. v. Hendry
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
McAvoy, 216 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1955) __18 Janzen v. Goos, 302 F. 2d 421 (8th Cir. 1962) ____1) Johnston v. Cordell National Bank, 421 F. 2d 1310 (10th Cir. 1970) 12 Korn v. … McAvoy, 216 F. 2d 399, 402 and 403 (5th Cir. 1955), and the many cases cited therein.
409 U.S. 1023Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Marvin Gipson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 25, 2025
Id. at 24. … See Petition for Writ 25 of Certiorari at 22–24, Garland v.
Respondents Brief — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018
Strickland, 556 U.S. 1, 24 (2009). … Comm. to End the War in Viet Nam, 399 U.S. 383, 388 (1970) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(d)).
Agency decision · Agency decision
Id. § 4.01(7), 2013-43 I.R.B. at 399. 15 [*15] For 2014 through 2016, the Walshes elected to file joint returns. … Walsh failed to carry her 24 [*24] burden and is not entitled to relief under section 6015(f) for 2014 through 2016.
United States Tax CourtSupreme Court brief · Brief of Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari · 1944
S. 399. 421. where this Court said: a “There has been much discussion as to whether extrinsic fraud is here alleged, and the case of United States v. … On October 24, 1941, the original petition herein was filed.
322 U.S. 271Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jackson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2011
Deference 1s Unwarranted Because this Case Does Not Present Matters. of Ixclusively Local Concern. ................... 24 B. … I, § 8, cl. 17 Statutes: 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a)....... 30) 24, Zd, 30 18 26 1, 32 | + Fay. A 20 13, 24, 26 S 61D | § 1257(b) D.C. Code § 1-125(b) (1977 Supp.)
562 U.S. 1178Reply Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
Richmond, 496 U.S. 414, 419-24 (1990). Il. … See Br. of Amici Curiae STAPPA et al. 7-16; Br. of States of New York, et al. 22-29; Br. of Former Administrators Browner and Train 21-24.
549 U.S. 561Amicus Brief — Wolman v. Walter
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1977
Supp. 399 (S.D. Ohio 1972) Off’ d 409 U.S. 908 (1972) ..0.2.....-.2c-cereceeeeerersrensnensesers 18, 24, 25 Wolman v. Essex, CA 73-292 (S.D. Ohio 1973), vacaied, A —————— 24, 26 Wolman v. … Supp. 399 (S.D. Ohio 1972), aff'd 409 U.S. 808 (1972) (hereinafter cited as “Wolman I”).
433 U.S. 229Motion to Dismiss — Rankin v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1978
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) 24, 28 Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969) . 27, 29 V. Whether The Supreme Court Of Ohio Di Bella v. United States, 369 U.S. 148, 82 S. … United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959) 24 ton County, Ohio, And By Dismissing The Elkins v.
434 U.S. 1056Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 20, 2021
CULTURE 24, 26 (1999). … Ann. 399, 399-400 (1858); State v. Wilforth, 74 Mo. 528, 531 (1881); State v. Speller, 86 N.C. 697, 700 (1882); see also Cockrum v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.