Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — John and Jane Parents 1, et al., Petitioners v. Montgomery County Board of Education, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 12, 2023

Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 760 (1995) (cleaned up). … Ct. at 2310 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chike Uzuegbunam, et al., Petitioners v. Stanley C. Preczewski, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2020

Int’l Union, Local 1000, 567 U.S. 298, 307–08 (2012) (cleaned up). Constitutional rights are no small thing. … When acting consistent with the First Amendment, colleges and universities engage students and faculty in the pursuit of truth, beauty, and innovation.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) ....... 15 Slavsky v. New York City Police Department, 967 F. Supp. 117 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) ............---. 7 Varity Corp. v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85,91 (1983) (describing how ERISA does not mandate that “employers provide any particular benefits”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

Standard Oil Co. ot Cal., I 11 Utility Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, Oe en I 11 Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer. … of the Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Microsoft Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2018

Nat’l Australian Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010) . . . . . . 1, 3, 4, 7, 15, 16, 18,23 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. … Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427 (2014).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Miniso Depot CA, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Yongtong Liu

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 30, 2025

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 9 Cal. 5th 762 (2020) ........................................... 1 Silverman v. DiscGenics, Inc., 2023 WL 2480054 (D. … Kenneth Cole Prods., Inc., 40 Cal. 4th 1094 (2007). 3 courts—a result the Federal Arbitration Act was specifically designed to avoid.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Glacier Northwest, Inc., dba CalPortland, Petitioner v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 174

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 8, 2022

As a result, “the plant would have been out of operation for a period of several months” and the employer would have suffered “substantial property damage” to its plant facilities. … Wisconsin Emp’t Bd., 340 U.S. 383, 389 (1951) (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 157) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

THE EDMONDS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE SUBSTANTIVE STANDARDS OF THE FAIR HOUSING AMENDMENTS ACT UNDER THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF 42 U.S.C. § 3607(b)(1) The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (“FHAA” … It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth val- ues, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people. 15 416 U.S. at 9."

Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Ee, CTT iricndiduncccnibaneniindneinediaininns 28, 29 Greg Duncan et al., Cleaning Up Their Act: The Effects of Marriage and Cohabitation on Licit and Illicit Drug Use, 43 Demography 691 (2006) … Greg Duncan et al., Cleaning Up Their Act: The 21 Effects of Marriage and Cohabitation on Licit and Illicit Drug Use, 43 Demography 691 (2006); see also ASPE Report, supra, at 3 (collecting sources

Amicus Curiae Brief — Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

and comment. … A shorter period of time is permissible as long as the employee 8 decision to accept such shorter period of time is knowing and voluntary. 136 Cong. Rec. 813,808 (daily ed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ferring B.V. v. Meijer, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010

Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826 (2002) Intl Tel. & Tel. Corp. v. Raychem Corp.., 538 F.2d 453 (1st Cir. 1976) Keene Corp. v. … Section 1338(a), in turn, gives. district courts broad jurisdiction over “any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.” Jd. § 1338(a).

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Aitkin v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

It only takes a reading of the Clean Water Act, 91 Stat. 1566, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq., and its amendments t realize that this judicially approved discrimination against the Western States has now … spread to include all 18 of the States in regards to wetlands and tribal grants of authority to regulate, 33 U.S.C. § 1377 of the Clean Water Act, under the same power analysis as the Reclamation

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bethany M. Hall, Petitioner v. A. Scott Fleming, Director, Virginia State Counsel of Higher Education

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 1, 2026

In Zobrest, a deaf student at a Catholic high school requested a sign-language interpreter, as required by the Individuals With Disabilities Educational Act. … Espinoza, 591 U.S. at 484-85 (quoting Trinity, 582 U.S. at 466) (cleaned up). VTAG's categorical exclusion is clearly not warranted.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. … HINTON, PETITIONERS 3 v UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 6, 2019

of Roger Williams to the early national period of the Founders. … Also, following this Court’s rejection of a free exercise right of an Air Force serviceman to wear a yarmulke while in uniform, Goldman v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 10, 2025

O.L.C. 103, 104-05 (1998) (“Relevant caselaw and opinions of this Office reflect the view that the [Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), which generally prohibits the use of “any part of the Army or the Air Force … See Act of Aug. 10, 1956, 70A Stat. 199, 525 (reclassifying the provision in question as 10 U.S.C. §§ 3500 and 8500, applying to the Army National Guard and the Air Force National Guard, respectively).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Forest Service, et al., Petitioners v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2020

This estimate assumes that the Clean Power Plan, which the Trump administration has rescinded, is not implemented. 6 showed no significant increase in natural gas consumption, and the only model that … Around the same time, the Forest Service provided critical comments on Atlantic’s draft biological evaluation.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Morrissey v. Brewer

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1972

he Tt has traditionally been said that, parole and ‘probation 3 are privilewes s bestawed as an act offgrace by the State.’ … te 22 "reasons: not présentel and aired would j inv ite arbitrari I- ness and-nullify the right to notice and a hearing...

Amicus Curiae Brief — Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Comm'n

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

The justifications for the regulation of express advocacy apply equally to ads aired during those periods if the ads are intended to influence the voter’s decisions and have that effect. … The exception would also avoid incentivising incumbent federal office holders to avoid public criticism for their official acts by scheduling them during the electioneering communication blackout period

Amicus Curiae Brief — FMC Corp. v. Holliday

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 ENE SA SERRE La Sc 6 United Food & Commercial Workers & ‘Employers Arizona Health & Welfare Trust v. … During the five year period 1981-1985, enrollment in self-insured health plans of medium and large firms nearly doubled. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.