Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.18s
Amicus Curiae Brief — NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Renegotiation Board. 157 U.S. App. D.C. 121, 482 F.2d 710 (1973), cert. granted, 94 S.Ct. 2603 (1974), 8 and in Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, ___ U.S. App. DL... aa F.2d 63 (1974). … FTC, 146 U.S. App.
421 U.S. 132Amicus Curiae Brief — Stoneridge Inv. Partners v. Scientific-Atl.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Central Bank, 511 U.S. at 177. … S11 U.S. at 173.
552 U.S. 148Amicus Curiae Brief — New Prime Inc., Petitioner v. Dominic Oliveira
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2018
U.S. R.R. Lab. … The U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Playboy Enterprises, Inc., 815 F.2d 323 (Sth Cir. 1987), cert. denied, No. 87-482 (Mar. 28, BY «cc kvegkvecsscdaueesacdaeeesneeteenens Se Epoch Producing Corp. v. … Playboy Enterprises, Inc., 815 F.2d 323 (Sth Cir. 1987), cert. denied, No. 87-482 (Mar. 28, 1988), a case that raised the same legal issue as this case. STATEMENT “ A.
490 U.S. 730Amicus Curiae Brief — DeRay Mckesson, Petitioner v. John Doe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 15, 2023
Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) (per curiam) ............ 8, 16, 24, 26 City of Houston v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) ...................................................7 Connick v. … Snyder, 562 U.S. at 458; Hustler, 485 U.S. at 52; Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 271-72.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Eklund v. Byron Union Union School School District District (No. 05-1539)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
U.S. … Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, 430-482 (1962) (holding that a prayer at the beginning of a school day violates the Establishment Clause even if students are permitted to remain silent or leave the classroom)
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 9, 2025
Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ................................... 3, 4 Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ................................... 5 Epperson v. … Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 583 (1987); see also, e.g., Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
S., at 481-482. Heck clarified and reinforced the distinction between habeas and § 1983 by refusing to follow this dictum. See 512 U. S., at 482. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 430 (1979) (same).
523 U.S. 637Amicus Curiae Brief — Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas City
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Carr, 369 U.S. 186, through Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, to Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474. … to the problem of determining which of them were covered by the equal-population principle (id. at 482-483).
397 U.S. 50Amicus Curiae Brief — Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994)........ 1, 14 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ...... 14 Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), floodplain zoning was in place when the First English Church was denied the right temporarily to rebuild. Similarly, in Dolan v.
533 U.S. 606Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 24, 2022
Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303 (1976) .................................................. 5 United States v. … Escobar, 579 U.S. at 181 (quoting United States v. Bornstein, 423 U.S. 303, 309 (1976)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — McAusland v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Rose, 425 U.S. 352 (1976). … Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 232 (1974).
507 U.S. 1003Amicus Curiae Brief — Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Ed. 2d 482 (1988). … Ed. 2d 482 (1988). -43- scheme to obscenity, holding that the state's anti-racketeering purpose rendered irrelevant the statute's impact in a particular case.
489 U.S. 46Amicus Curiae Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987). … Board of Airport Commissioners, 482 U.S. at 577 (White, J., concurring). Il.
505 U.S. 830Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller-Wohl Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & Industry
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Supreme Court, U.S. … Division of Industrial Welfare, 509 F.2d 20 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1063 (1976). B. The Montana Statute Underinires the Objectives of Federal Law.
474 U.S. 1045Amicus Curiae Brief — Torromeo v. Town of Fremont, New Hampshire
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001); Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725 (1997); Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), as vindicating its earlier conclusion that compensation was required for the effective period of the irrational ordinance. Jd. In Nemmers v.
539 U.S. 923Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) ..........cccceeee 18, 22 Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 120 S. Ct. 1073 CHD T ssnnstnsicshsinnicantiiiinnanbigbaimmaianiiadeaaanaiaa 18 Wards Cove Packing Co. v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89-90, 98-99 (1987) (prison regulation prohibiting most inmate marriages failed to satisfy the test of a “valid, rational connection” to a “legitimate and neutral” governmental
531 U.S. 356Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 273 (1993) (citing Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977) and Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980)). … Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) (striking down a state regulation of inmate marriages because it was not reasonably related to legitimate penological 10 objectives).* The indisputable fact remains that
Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. AT&T, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026
-Arab AntiDiscrimination Comm., 525 U.S. 471, 482 (1999) (similar); Chao v. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc., 534 U.S. 235 (2002) (parties did not dispute certain regulations were preempted). … Axalta Coating Sys., 144 F.4th at 482 (Bibas, J., concurring). This case provides an opportunity to clarify that framework. See, e.g., Seven Cnty. Infrastructure Coal. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971) Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972) Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385 (1914) Johnson v. … United States, supra at p.p. 479-482) The classic explanation of the Fourth Amendment was given by this Court in Johnson v.
420 U.S. 103
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.