Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters1987

10,000+ results

0.72s

  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Knost v. MacMillan

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942

    and writing for both herself and her husband, giving Don- ald motherly advice on business and on his marriage and divorce (R. 325-399). … Mace- Millan’s office to have him help her make a will with Donald the sole beneficiary (R. 23, 24, 30). They mod- eled it after the Doctor’s will, and Mrs.

    317 U.S. 641
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Rogers v. Cortes (No. 06-1721)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    Comm. 2007) (unreported order approving bill of costs entered January 24, 2007). … Tucker, 399 F. Supp. 1258 (E.D. PA 1975), aff'd, 424 U.S. 959 (1976) (affirming U.S.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dominguez v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

    Marzano, 160 F.3d 399 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied. 349 U.S. 1175 (1999) ......... iis aces ee United States v. … Marzano, 160 F.3d 399, 401 (7 Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1171 (1999); United States v. Rawley, 152 F.3d 83 1, 848 (8 Cir. 1998); United States v.

    532 U.S. 1039
  • Appendix O — Giampa v. Giampa (No. 09-502)

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix O · 2009

    Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923), “the right of parents to “bring up children,” 262 U.S., at 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, and to control the education of their own” is protected … VICTORIA contends that the following phrase is a non sequitur [the 24 sentence does not logically follow the 1**].

  • Reply Brief — Super Duper, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2011

    Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (38d Cir. 2005)). … Banjo Buddies, 399 F.3d at 174.

    562 U.S. 1179
  • Reply Brief — Federal Trade Commission, Petitioner v. Credit Bureau Center, LLC, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 28, 2020

    See Pet. 24. … As the Court explained in Porter, the return of illegally acquired funds is “clearly a part of the subject matter of a suit for an injunction.” 328 U.S. at 399.

  • Reply Brief — Jason Laut, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 28, 2020

    Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) .................................. 8 United States v. Miller, 891 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2018) .............. 4, 7, 10, 11 United States v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399, 406-10, n.4 (4th Cir. 2020).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — In Re Grand Jury

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

    Pet. at 24 (internal quotations and citation omitted). … United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998). 4 14 CONCLUSION The Court should adopt the D.C. Circuit’s significant purpose test. Respectfully submitted, LAWRENCE S.

  • Reply Brief — CoStar Group, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Commercial Real Estate Exchange, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 3, 2026

    Dentsply Int’l, Inc., 399 F.3d 181, 191 (3d Cir. 2005) (emphasis added) (citation omitted). … See Pet. 23-24. And district courts have seized upon the Ninth Circuit’s disregard of Trinko in this very case to deny motions to dismiss for other refusal-to-deal claims.

  • Brief for Respondent — Gart v. Cole

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1959

    B. 24 626,.the court, in uphalding an IIlinois slum clearance stat- ute, stated (414 Ill. at 617, 111 N. E. 2d at 636-637) : . … Peoria Housing Authority, 399 Ill. ~ 579, 594-595, 78 N. E. 2d 276, 284-285; Foeller v. Housing .

    359 U.S. 978
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Riggins v. Nevada

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

    On January 20, February 17, 18, 19, 24 and March 9, 1988, Defendant’s Arraignment was held before the Honorable Judge James Brennan in the Clark County District Court (ROA 47).' … Superior Court 148 Ariz. 229, 714 P.2d 399, y.S, vy. Watson 893 F.2d 970 (8th Cir. 19S~)- The United States Supreme Court in Youngberg vy.

    504 U.S. 127
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abrego v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

    Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 399-404" (1985). … Waters 2115 Main Street Santa Monica,CA 90405 (310) 399-3259 Counsel for Petitioner Juan Garcia Abrego *Counsel of Record

    538 U.S. 925
  • Security Zone; Increase of Security Zones From 100 to 500 Yards; San Francisco Bay, Delta Ports, Monterey Bay, and Humboldt Bay, CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 3, 2010

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone 415-399-7442 e-mail D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … As used in this section— Cruise ship means any vessel over 100 gross register tons, carrying more than 12 passengers for hire which makes voyages lasting more than 24 hours, of which any part is

    75 FR 67673Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Safety Zone: America's Cup World Series Regattas, San Francisco Bay; San Francisco, CA

    Federal Register · Rule · Sep 6, 2012

    Coast Guard Sector San Francisco; telephone (415) 399-7443 or email at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil . If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: August 17, 2012. Cynthia L.

    77 FR 54815Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Security Zones; San Francisco Bay, San Francisco, CA and Oakland CA

    Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 15, 2004

    L. 99-399), Congress amended section 7 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), 33 U.S.C. 1226, to allow the Coast Guard to take actions, including the establishment of security and safety zones, … the following geographical positions—       Latitude Longitude 37°43′35″ N 122°15′00″ W 37°43′40″ N 122°15′05″ W 37°43′34″ N 122°15′12″ W 37°43′24

    69 FR 2320Homeland Security DepartmentCoast Guard
  • Logan Generating Company, L.P., et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings

    Federal Register · Notice · Apr 14, 2005

    ER05-399-001] Take notice that on March 30, 2005, Southern Company Services, Inc. … Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on April 21, 2005. 24. Victoria International LTD [Docket No. ER05-757-000] Take notice that on March 31, 2005, Victoria International LTD.

    70 FR 19750Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Job Training Partnership Act; Pilots and Demonstration Program

    Federal Register · Notice · Apr 22, 1996

    In the pilot demonstration, opportunity areas for youth will be establishing within EZ/ECs, with the goal of increasing the employment rates of 16-24 year-olds in the target communities from current levels … Box 1309, Ogden, Utah 84402, (801) 399-8850, (801) 399-8114 Vermont: Burlington, Mr. Robert Ware, Vermont Department of Employment and Training, P.O.

    61 FR 17729Labor DepartmentEmployment and Training Administration
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David R. Smith, Petitioner v. Tennessee National Guard

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 7, 2018

    Ct. 399, 85 L.Ed. 2d 581 (1941) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Lee Med., Inc. v. Beecher, 312 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Lind v. … On April 24, 2011, LTC Smith wrote the Tennessee National Guard requesting to know his next duty assignment.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 20, 2019

    Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (3d Cir. 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Bishop v. … Renosky, 399 F.3d 168, 174–75 (3d Cir. 2005) (citation omitted).

  • Respondents Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 20, 2018

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) .................... 3, 9, 10 In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System, 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988) ..................................... … Rosebud, 430 U.S. at 601 n.24. E. If this case differs in any way from precedent, it is that it does not give real consideration to the third Solem prong.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.