Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

TAOS CAEN ois ingga ee ee ee 8 RevisEpD Mopet STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT Proceeding in the Committee of the Whole, August 23, 1960, at 8 (comments of Professor WIT si vn hs cee ci Daa eee 8 … Revisep Mopet State ADMINISTRATIVE Procepure Act, Proceeding in the Committee of the Whole, August 23, 1960, at 8 (comments of Professor Merrill). 8 The 1981 Model Act is more nuanced in its distinction

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Steel Corp. Plan for Employee Insurance Benefits v. Musisko

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Delta Air Lines, 463 U.S. 85. 98 (1983): Alessi v. … Texas Air Corp., 834 F.2d 488. 492 (5th Cir. 1987). See also Air-Shields, Inc. v. Fullam, No. 89-1295 (3d Cir. Dec. 7. 1989).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Osage Nation v. Irby

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

Although the surface rights were allotted, all of th ubsurface mineral rights were “reserved to the Osage tribe for a period of 25 years.” Osage Allotment Act § 3, 34 Stat. 543. … See, e.g., Act of Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 493, § 1, 45 St 1478; Act of Oct. 21, 1978, Pub. | Stat. 1660 (extending trust period in perpetuity) 2. a.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McLane Co. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 30 (2016) (No. 15-1248)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Cir. 2005)................... 16 FEDERAL STATUTES Freedom of Information Act, Be is Sr I OI aicisccccsccscsennnssosesscuses 15 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 20006 et seq … United Air Lines, Inc., 287 F.3d 643, 653 (7th Cir. 2002) (quoting EEOC v. K-Mart Corp., 694 F.2d 1055, 1066 (6th Cir. 1982)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Porter v. Nussle

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

or not act, e.g., a policy providing that an em- ployee should perform some act if it is ‘reasonably’ warranted by the circumstances.” … Gear; a clean-up of a flooded cell that re- ‘sulted in pinochle cards getting wet; and a search of a cell in which clean and dirty clothes were mixed together. 141 Cong. Rec. at 14 579 (Sen.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Defense Center, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2023

Ninth Circuit posited will become a reality unless and until an 3 For instance, a final rule setting the procedural requirements for all applications to the agency, conducted pursuant to notice and comment … See National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations Revisions, 87 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 2, 2018

Lastly, the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning has far-reaching impact as reflected by EPA’s recent reliance on it in imposing federal water quality standards under the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251- … There, this Court declined to recognize the availability of a laches as a complete defense to a Copyright Act claim for damages brought within the three-year limitation period in 17 U.S.C. § 507(b).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Zayn al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn, aka Abu Zubaydah, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2021

Sportsflight Air, Inc., No. 509735 (N.Y. App. Div.) .................... 13, 16, 17 C. … Sportsflight Air, Inc., No. 509735, (N.Y. App.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Monge v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

Therefore, this Court has periodically reversed course and overruled prior double jeopardy decisions. See, e.g., United States v. Scott, 437 U. S. 82, 86-87 (1978) (overruling United States v. … As the slate has been “wiped clean,” any legal sentence may be imposed upon retrial.’

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bowen v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975

Supp. » Civ. act. - a ie. … The stop took place approximately 70 air miles north of the Mexican border.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Connecticut, Petitioner v. Michael Skakel

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 10, 2018

Reed, 535 N.W.2d 496, 505 n.14 (1995) (cleaned up) (citing Murray v. Carrier, 477 U.S. 478, 496 (1986), and Kimmelman, 477 U.S. at 386). … In this Court, the majority commented that there was “room for debate about counsel’s obligation to follow at least some of” the leads that Rompilla claimed they should have. Id. at 383.

Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

Utility Air Regulatory Grp. V. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2446 (2014). ACCORD: United States v. … Air, 134 S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonough v. Smith (No. 18-485)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

claims based on individual wrongful acts.” bid. … The question before the Court is when that period began to run.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Braidwood Management, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2025

In Morrison, the Court concluded that “the Act itself [was] restricted in applicability to certain federal officials suspected of certain serious federal crimes,” and “c[ould] only act within the scope … (cleaned up)).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Petitioners’ common law theory of liability would severely impair a safety program that the federal government developed with unprecedented thoroughness over a period of 30 years. … The agency has been “extremely concerned * * * about deaths caused by air bags,” 61 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Federation of Independent Business, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 30, 2021

Department of the Air Force, 527 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 2008) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Wolfe v. … Department of the Air Force, 527 F.3d 806, 817-821 (9th Cir. 2008) (applying Sell to discharge of Air Force nurse for homosexual relationship); Russell v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Office of the President v. Office of Independent Counsel

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

United States Dep’t of Air Force, 566 F.2d 242, 252-53 (D.C. Cir. 1977). … [I]t is important, in understanding the privilege, to focus on the time period before the communications are made.” Stephen A.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lukhard v. Reed

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

She also spent her award for transportation expenses, clothing and a few inexpensive toys for her child, and non-Food Stamp items such as cleaning supplies. Ms. … Although it is true that the Secretary’s interpretation of the Social Security Act would be entitled to deference, this deference does not abrogate the Court’s duty to in- terpret the Act in a manner

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cory Ratzloff, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 3, 2023

C., 503 U.S. 291, 305 (1992) (cleaned up). … And it can only constitutionally issue these Guidelines “because they must pass two checks: congressional review and the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

They all concerned a single, time-barred act, not as in this case, a lengthy series of related acts, many of which were within the limitations period. ARGUMENT I. … So long as the employee files his charge within the limitations period following the last illegal act, the charge is timely.