Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.46s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Zollo Drum Co. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
NLRB, 482 US. ee eh ana hae kesh sees anks pa tdeces 10 Grand Labs., Inc. v. Midcon Labs of lowa, 32 F.3d 1277 I a 7,8 John S. Boyd Co. v. … NLRB, 482 U.S. 27 (1987)). The rationale for the successor liability rule adopted in Fall River is inapplicable to CERCLA for two primary reasons.
524 U.S. 926Amicus Curiae Brief — Faith Bible Chapel International, Petitioner v. Gregory Tucker
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 10, 2023
Carver, 260 U.S. 482 (1923) ........................................... 11 United States v. City of Miami, 614 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1980) ........................... 13 Werft v. Desert Sw. … Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70, 85 (1995) (quoting United States v. Carver, 260 U.S. 482, 490 (1923)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Massachu- setts, 471 U.S. 724, 738 (1985): accord Jngersoll-Rand Co. V. MeClendon, 111 8. Ct. 478, 482 (1990). … Ct. at 482 (quotation marks and citations omitted; emphasis added).
505 U.S. 88Amicus Curiae Brief — Batson v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Partida, 430 U.S. 482 (1977)... ......4.. 10 Commonwealth v. Brown, 11 Mass. App. Ct. 288, 416 SRD DE oc cccncesesescnensoeneceesonss 25 Commonwealth v. DiMatteo, 12 Mass. App. … Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 503 (1977) (Marshall, J., concurring). See also Babcock, Voir Dire: Pre- serving ‘Its Wonderful Power,’ 27 Stan. L.
476 U.S. 79Amicus Curiae Brief — Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Montana, 450 U.S. at 559 n.9; quoted in Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of theYakima Indian Nation, 492 U.S. 408, 423 (1989) (plurality opinion). … Lee, 358 U.S. 217 (1959)).
532 U.S. 645Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2020
Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979) ....................11 Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)............... passim Brumfield v. Cain, 135 S. Ct. 2269 (2015) ....................2 Cooper v. … Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423–24 (1979)). 12 under a preponderance standard, Hill was intellectually disabled.23 Georgia prosecutors appealed both rulings to the Georgia Supreme Court, which reversed the lower
Amicus Curiae Brief — Brown Group, Inc. v. Hicks
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Lukens Stee: Co., 482 U.S. 656 ESR 7 Gonzalez Vv. Home Insurance Co., 909 F.2d 716 TER TN eR 8 Hill v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Inc., 918 F.2d 877 I einen 8 Howard vy. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 (1987); Saint Francis College v. Al Khazraji, 481 U.S. 604 (1987); Delaware State College v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250 (1980) ; McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transp.
498 U.S. 1011Amicus Curiae Brief — Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Smith, 472 U.S. 479, 482 (1985). 16 This Court has never intimated that the right to peti- tion the government is entitled to greater protection than any other right secured by the First Amendment. … McDonald, 472 US. at 482.
564 U.S. 379Amicus Curiae Brief — Mobil Corp. v. Adkins
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Litig., 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir. 2002).............. 16, 17 In re Dow Corning Corp., 86 F.3d 482 (6th Cir. … P. 23(f)); In re Dow Corning Corp., 86 F.3d 482, 487-88 (6th Cir. 1996) (collateral order doctrine); Castano v.
537 U.S. 944Amicus Curiae Brief — Yee v. Escondido
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Florida Power Corp., 480 U.S. 245 (1987) ................. 26 First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. EE Tee 2 Hall v. … Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987); and First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987).
503 U.S. 519Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2020
Att’y Gen. 482 (1831) .......... 12 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – cont’d Page(s) The President and Accounting Offices, 1 U.S. Op. … Att’y Gen. 482, 489 (1831) (if “a district attorney was prosecuting a suit . . . for the purpose of oppressing an individual . . . such a prosecution would not be a faithful execution of the law”); 1 U.S
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
California, 283 U.S. 423 (1981) .....-ccccccccceesereee 29 Arkansas La. Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571 (1981)............ 29 Bates v. … California, 283 U.S. 423, 451 (1931) (“The United States may perform its functions without conforming to the police regula- tions of a state.”); Helfrich, 804 F.3d at 1100 n.7 (col- lecting cases).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Assn. v. Heald
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)........ 20 Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 aa SU CMU ciceichinicheciehinelientapheiment deh elas 14 Philadelphia v. … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 439 (1990) (plurality) (“Congress has the power to confer immunity from state regulation on Government suppliers beyond that conferred by the Constitution alone, even when
543 U.S. 954Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Norma Anderson, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2024
Rev. 349, 423 (2023). Presidents take a different oath prescribed by Article II. See U.S. Const. art. II, §1; see also Am. Commc’ns Ass’n, C.I.O. v. … U.S. Const. art. VI. Presidents do not take the Article VI Oath. See Tillman & Blackman, supra, at 423.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2018
Alaska, 521 U.S. 1 (1997)......................................................1 United States v. Cooper, 482 F.3d 658 (4th Cir. 2007)....................................6 Upstate Forever v. … Cooper, 482 F.3d 658, 667 (4th Cir. 2007).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Granholm v. Heald
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
United States, 495 U.S. 423 (1990)........ 20 Pennsylvania Dep't of Corrections v. Yeskey, 524 re PI sccvereeesoscoeritsitenniiniiniiieaeididainiiaaiabiaatariinaiieaes 14 Philadelphia v. … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 439 (1990) (plurality) (“Congress has the power to confer immunity from state regulation on Government suppliers beyond that conferred by the Constitution alone, even when
544 U.S. 460Amicus Curiae Brief — Patchak v. Zinke, 137 S. Ct. 2091 (2017) (No. 16-498)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
No. 106-423, §§ 2-3, 114 Stat. 1875 (2000)............... Wampanoag Tribal Council of Gay Head, Inc. Indian Claims Settlement Act of 1987, Pub. L. No. 100-95, § 10, 101 Stat. 704.0000... … No. 106-423, §§ 2-3, 114 Stat. 1875, 1875- 76 (2000). Such certainty, Congress has found, is necessary for Tribal economic development, including for gaming enterprises.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 27, 2023
than what is reported.8 As Purdue Canada, controlled by MNP Consulting, LTd., which is in turn, controlled by the Sackler family, engaged in the same aggressive and deceptive tactics that caused Purdue U.S … the school in Thunder Bay had opioid dependencies,” while the communities they came from had even higher rates.15 Even worse, a 2010 study by the Northern Ontario School of Medicine found that 17% of 482
Amicus Curiae Brief — Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. Calhoun
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1996
REV. 423 (1994) ............eeeeeee Conventions 28 U.S.T. 3459, 1050 U.N.T.S. 16, amended by T.LA.S. No. 10672, 1143 U.N.T.S. 346..... … REV. 423 (1994). Until Calhoun, the Court of Appeals also seemed to be in agree- ment with application of general maritime law to recre- ational boaters. See Sinclair v.
516 U.S. 199Amicus Curiae Brief — Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987). … Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423 (1987), or ‘im- pliedly, by creating a comprehensive enforcement scheme that is incompatible with individual enforce- ment under § 1983
544 U.S. 113
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.